Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-13T15:55:13.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The measurement time required for determining total NH3 losses after field application of slurries by trail hoses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2012

K. NI ,
A. PACHOLSKI ,
D. GERICKE  and
H. KAGE
K. NI
Affiliation:
Nanjing Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Science (CAS), Beijing East Road 71, 210008 Nanjing, P.R. China Agronomy and Crop Science Department, Institute of Crop Science and Plant Breeding, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Hermann-Rodewald-Strasse 9, 24118 Kiel, Germany
A. PACHOLSKI*
Affiliation:
Agronomy and Crop Science Department, Institute of Crop Science and Plant Breeding, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Hermann-Rodewald-Strasse 9, 24118 Kiel, Germany
D. GERICKE
Affiliation:
Agronomy and Crop Science Department, Institute of Crop Science and Plant Breeding, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Hermann-Rodewald-Strasse 9, 24118 Kiel, Germany
H. KAGE
Affiliation:
Agronomy and Crop Science Department, Institute of Crop Science and Plant Breeding, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Hermann-Rodewald-Strasse 9, 24118 Kiel, Germany
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: pacholski@pflanzenbau.uni-kiel.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Monitoring ammonia (NH3) emission is time consuming and requires specialized measurement equipment. The measurement time can be reduced if there is a close relationship between time and subsequent cumulated NH3 emission values. A statistical analysis was employed to study the relationship between cumulative NH3 emissions over varying time intervals and final NH3 loss after 3 days of measurement. A large number of multi-plot field experiments on NH3 loss after the application of animal and biogas slurries by trail hoses to crops in Northern Germany were carried out from 2007 to 2010. Based on data from 2007, measured using a passive sampler method, a linear empirical model was developed to calculate final cumulated NH3 loss from intermediate cumulated losses. Linear model fitting showed that cumulative NH3 losses after 24 h were significantly correlated with final cumulated NH3 losses, explaining more than 0·98 of its variation. The linear coefficient was 1·34, implying that c. 0·73 of final NH3 loss occurred within the first 24 h. Validation by datasets obtained from another year (2008), two additional measurement methods and another agro-region (marsh area, 2009/10) resulted in a close agreement of model predictions with measured data within the range of model uncertainty and data variation. The results underpin the feasibility of calculating final NH3 losses from cumulative losses during first 24 h after slurry application and can be used to simplify NH3 loss measurement after the application of liquid slurries in multi-plot field experiments. The slope of the linear relationship is only valid for liquid slurries and the environmental conditions of the present study, which are typical for many agro-regions in north-western Europe, and will have to be adapted for different climatic conditions. A time-efficient measurement of emissions from solid organic fertilizers might require a different time span.

Type
Crops and Soils Research Papers
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 151 , Issue 1 , February 2013 , pp. 34 - 43
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chantigny, M. H., Macdonald, J. D., Beaupre, C., Rochette, P., Angers, D. A., Masse, D. & Parent, L. E. (2009). Ammonia volatilization following surface application of raw and treated liquid swine manure. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 85, 275–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dragosits, U., Theobald, M. R., Place, C. J., Lord, E., Webb, J., Hill, J., ApSimon, H. M. & Sutton, M. A. (2002). Ammonia emission, deposition and impact assessment at the field scale: a case study of sub-grid spatial variability. Environmental Pollution 117, 147–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geisser, S. (1993). Predictive Inference: An Introduction. New York: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gericke, D., Pacholski, A. & Kage, H. (2011). Measurement of ammonia emissions in multi-plot field experiments. Biosystems Engineering 108, 164–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, L. A. & Sharpe, R. R. (1998). Atmospheric ammonia: issues on transport and nitrogen isotope measurement. Atmospheric Environment 32, 273–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, Z. L., Alva, A. K., Calvert, D. V. & Banks, D. J. (1999). Ammonia volatilization from different fertilizer sources and effects of temperature and soil pH. Soil Science 164, 750–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huijsmans, J. F. M., Hol, J. M. G. & Hendriks, M. M. W. B. (2001). Effect of application technique, manure characteristics, weather and field conditions on ammonia volatilization from manure applied to grassland. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 49, 323–342.Google Scholar
Kennedy, J. B. & Neville, A. M. (1986). Basic Statistical Methods for Engineers and Scientists. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Leuning, R., Freney, J. R., Denmead, O. T. & Simpson, J. R. (1985). A sampler for measuring atmospheric ammonia flux. Atmospheric Environment 19, 1117–1124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGinn, S. M. & Sommer, S. G. (2007). Ammonia emissions from land-applied beef cattle manure. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 87, 345–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menzi, H., Katz, P. E., Fahrni, M., Neftel, A. & Frick, R. (1998). A simple empirical model based on regression analysis to estimate ammonia emissions after manure application. Atmospheric Environment 32, 301–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misselbrook, T. H., Brookman, S. K. E., Smith, K. A., Cumby, T., Williams, A. G. & Mccrory, D. F. (2005). Crusting of stored dairy slurry to abate ammonia emissions: pilot-scale studies. Journal of Environmental Quality 34, 411–419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monaco, S., Sacco, D., Pelissetti, S., Dinuccio, E., Balsari, P., Rostami, M. & Grignani, C. (2012). Laboratory assessment of ammonia emission after soil application of treated and untreated manures. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 150, 65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ni, K., Pacholski, A., Gericke, D. & Kage, H. (2011). Analysis of ammonia losses after field application of biogas slurries by an empiricial model. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, doi:10.1002/jpln.201000358.Google Scholar
Nyord, T., Sogaard, H. T., Hansen, M. N. & Jensen, L. S. (2008). Injection methods to reduce ammonia emission from volatile liquid fertilisers applied to growing crops. Biosystems Engineering 100, 235–244.Google Scholar
Pacholski, A., Cai, G. X., Nieder, R., Richter, J., Fan, X. H., Zhu, Z. L. & Roelcke, M. (2006). Calibration of a simple method for determining ammonia volatilization in the field – comparative measurements in Henan Province, China. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 74, 259–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quakernack, R., Pacholski, A., Techow, A., Herrmann, A., Taube, F. & Kage, H. (2011). Ammonia volatilization and yield response of energy crops after fertilization with biogas residues in a coastal marsh of Northern Germany. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, doi:10.1016/j.agee.2011.05.030.Google Scholar
Saarijärvi, K. & Virkajärvi, P. (2009). Nitrogen dynamics of cattle dung and urine patches on intensively managed boreal pasture. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 147, 479–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanderson, M. G., Collins, W. J., Johnson, C. E. & Derwent, R. G. (2006). Present and future acid deposition to ecosystems: the effect of climate change. Atmospheric Environment 40, 1275–1283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanz, A., Misselbrook, T., Sanz, M. J. & Vallejo, A. (2010). Use of an inverse dispersion technique for estimating ammonia emission from surface-applied slurry. Atmospheric Environment 44, 999–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, E., Gordon, R., Bourque, C., Campbell, A., Genermont, S., Rochette, P. & Mkhabela, M. (2009). Simulated management effects on ammonia emissions from field applied manure. Journal of Environmental Management 90, 2531–2536.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sogaard, H. T., Sommer, S. G., Hutchings, N. J., Huijsmans, J. F. M., Bussink, D. W. & Nicholson, F. (2002). Ammonia volatilization from field-applied animal slurry – the ALFAM model. Atmospheric Environment 36, 3309–3319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommer, S. G. & Ersboll, A. K. (1996). Effect of air flow rate, lime amendments, and chemical soil properties on the volatilization of ammonia from fertilizers applied to sandy soils. Biology and Fertility of Soils 21, 53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommer, S. G., McGinn, S. M. & Flesch, T. K. (2005). Simple use of the backwards Lagrangian stochastic dispersion technique for measuring ammonia emission from small field-plots. European Journal of Agronomy 23, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommer, S. G., Olesen, J. E. & Christensen, B. T. (1991). Effects of temperature, wind-speed and air humidity on ammonia volatilization from surface applied cattle slurry. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 117, 91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonneveld, M. P. W. & Van Den Akker, J. J. H. (2011). Quantification of C and N stocks in grassland topsoils in a Dutch region dominated by dairy farming. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 149, 63–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spirig, C., Flechard, C. R., Ammann, C. & Neftel, A. (2010). The annual ammonia budget of fertilised cut grassland – Part 1: micrometeorological flux measurements and emissions after slurry application. Biogeosciences 7, 521–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tran, M. T., Vu, T. K. V., Sommer, S. G. & Jensen, L. S. (2011). Nitrogen turnover and loss during storage of slurry and composting of solid manure under typical Vietnamese farming conditions. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 149, 285–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandre, R. & Kaupenjohann, M. (1998). In situ measurement of ammonia emissions from organic fertilizers in plot experiments. Soil Science Society of America Journal 62, 467–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velthof, G. L., Oudendag, D., Witzke, H. P., Asman, W. A. H., Klimont, Z. & Oenema, O. (2009). Integrated assessment of nitrogen losses from agriculture in EU-27 using MITERRA-EUROPE. Journal of Environmental Quality 38, 402–417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Venables, W. N., Smith, D. M. & the R Development Core Team (2009). An Introduction to R. Vienna, Austria: R Development Core Team.Google Scholar
Whitehead, D. C. & Raistrick, N. (1991). Effects of some environmental-factors on ammonia volatilization from simulated livestock urine applied to soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils 11, 279–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wulf, S., Maeting, M. & Clemens, J. (2002). Application technique and slurry co-fermentation effects on ammonia, nitrous oxide, and methane emissions after spreading: I. Ammonia volatilization. Journal of Environmental Quality 31, 1789–1794.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhuang, S. Y. & Wang, M. K. (2010). Model estimation of ammonia volatilization from a paddy rice field after application of a surface film-forming material. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 148, 95–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar