Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-18T16:12:19.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The prediction of the voluntary feed intake of dairy cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. Vadiveloo
Affiliation:
Wye College, University of London, Ashford, Kent
W. Holmes
Affiliation:
Wye College, University of London, Ashford, Kent

Summary

Information on the total dry-matter intake (TDMI), concentrates supplied (C), live weight (LW), week of lactation (WL), milk yield (MY) and composition, quality of forage fed to, and parities of, 385 cows from five different sources were assembled to develop appetite prediction equations. The equations were based on multiple regression and least squares constants and were calculated using the data from each source and the data pooled from all sources. The major factors affecting total dry-matter intake (TDMI) were C, LW, WL and MY and for the pooled data these factors explained 73–76% (R2) of the total variation in TDMI. The predictive values of some of the equations were tested against independent sets of data and for groups of cows and individual cows, the equations predicted TDMI within ±1·1 and 1·6 kg, respectively. The application of the equations in the field is discussed and some suggestions made for increasing the R2 of future appetite equations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Research Council (1965). The nutrient requirements of farm livestock, No. 2. Ruminants. London: Agricultural Research Council.Google Scholar
Bines, J. A. (1976). Factors influencing voluntary food intake in cattle. In Principles of Cattle Production (ed. Swan, H. & Broster, W. H.), ch. 14, pp. 287305. London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Brown, C. A., Chandler, P. T. & Holter, J. B. (1977). Development of predictive equations for milk yield and dry matter intake in lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Science 60, 17391754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppock, C. E., Noller, C. H. & Wolfe, S. A. (1974). Effect of forage-concentrate ratio in complete feeds fed ad libitum on energy intake in relation to requirements by dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 57, 13711380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Curran, M. K., Wimble, R. H. & Holmes, W. (1970). Prediction of the voluntary intake of food by dairy cows. I. Stall fed cows in late pregnancy and early lactation. Animal Production 12, 195212.Google Scholar
Donker, J. D., Naik, D. J., Brahmakshatriya, R. D., Maclure, F. A. & Marten, G. C. (1976). Relationship of milk production to ration characteristics and the partition of consumed energy among needs for maintenance, milk produced and weight change. In Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals, EAAP Pub. no. 19, pp. 319322.Google Scholar
Draper, N. R. & Smith, H. (1967). Applied Regression Analysis. New York, London, Sydney: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Forbes, J. M. (1978). Models of the control of feed intake and energy balance in ruminants. In Hunger Models – Computable Theory of Feeding Control (ed. Booth, D. A.). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Harricharan, H., Mahadevan, P. & Springer, B. G. F. (1976). The performance of Santa Gertrudis, Sahiwal, Brahman and cross-bred animals in the intermediate savannahs of Guyana. 2. Birthweight and pre-weaning performance. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 87, 269276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarrige, R. (1978). (ed.) Alimentation des Ruminants. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), Paris.Google Scholar
Lamb, R. C., Walters, J. L., Andersen, M. J., Plowman, R. D., Mickelsen, C. H. & Miller, R. H. (1977). Effects of sire and interaction of sire with ration in efficiency of feed utilization by Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 60, 17551767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawes Agricultural Trust (1977). GENSTAT-a general statistical program. Rothamsted Experimental Station.Google Scholar
Leaver, J. D. (1973). Rearing of dairy cattle. 4. Effects of concentrate supplementation on the liveweight gain and feed intake of calves offered roughages ad libitum. Animal Production 17, 4352.Google Scholar
McCullough, M. E. (1973). Optimum Feeding of Dairy Animals for Meat and Milk. Atlanta, Georgia, U.S.A.: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Miller, R. H., Hooven, N. W., Smith, J. W. & Creegan, M. E. (1972). Feed consumption differences among lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Science 55, 454459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries & Food (1975). Energy allowances and feeding systems for ruminants. Technical Bulletin 33.Google Scholar
Moran, J. B. (1976). Beef production as influenced by grazing and feeding management and by mature size. Ph.D. thesis, Wye College, University of London.Google Scholar
Pabst, W., Kilkenny, J. B. & Langholz, H. J. (1977). Genetic and environmental factors influencing calf performance in pedigree beef cattle in Britain. 1. The influence of environmental effects on birth, 200-day and 400-day weights. Animal Production 24, 2939.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. & Cochran, W. G. (1967). Statistical Methods. Ames, Iowa, U.S.A.: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Vadiveloo, J. & Holmes, W. (1979). The effects of forage digestibility and concentrate supplementation on the nutritive value of the diet and performance of finishing cattle. Animal Production 29, 121129.Google Scholar