^{page 44 note 1} Davy, H.Elements of Agricultural Chemistry, 1st ed. (1813). London.Google Scholar

^{page 44 note 2} Schübler, G.Gründsatze der Agriculture-Chemie, (1830). Leipzig.Google Scholar

^{page 45 note 1} Briggs, L. J.U.S. Bureau of Soils, Bull. 10 (1897).Google Scholar

^{page 46 note 1} Wisconsin Agric. Expt. Station 6th Rept. (1889), p. 189.Google Scholar

^{page 47 note 1} King, and Slichter, . “Principles and conditions of the movements of ground water.” 19th Annual Report, 1899 (Pt II), (U.S. Geol. Survey).Google Scholar

^{page 47 note 2} Wied. Ann., 22 (1884), p. 510.Google Scholar

^{page 47 note 3} Wied. Ann., 22 (1884), p. 518.Google Scholar

^{page 47 note 4} Wied. Ann., 45 (1892), p. 666.Google Scholar

^{page 48 note 1} Journ. Agric. Science, 5 (1912–1913), p. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

^{page 48 note 2} Green and Ampt state that the so-called “glistening dew” of the picture post-card artist is composed of almost perfectly spherical grains or beads of glass of diameter 25 mm. upwards, and is thus an invaluable material for experimental tests of theoretical deductions, such as those of Slichter.

^{page 49 note 1} Journ. Agric. Science, 4 (1911–1912), p. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

^{page 49 note 2} New Phytologist, 12 (1913), p. 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

^{page 50 note 1} I.e. the moisture remaining in the 15° C. air-dried sample.

^{page 50 note 2} The hygroscopic moisture is the amount of water held by an air-dried soil and should not be confused with the hygroscopic coefficient, which is the amount of water taken up by a dry soil when exposed to a saturated atmosphere of water vapour. There is, of course, a general parallelism between the two.

^{page 50 note 3} Journ. Agric. Res., 16 (1919), p. 263.Google Scholar

^{page 51 note 1} Ref. p. 45.

^{page 51 note 2} Utah Sia. Bull., No. 115 (1912), p. 195.Google Scholar

^{page 52 note 1} Russell, E.J.Soil Conditions and Plant Growth, 3rd ed. (1917), p. 140. Longmans.Google Scholar

^{page 52 note 2} Journ. Agric. Res., 9 (1917), p. 27.Google Scholar

^{page 52 note 3} Landw. Jahrb., 30 (1901), p. 361.Google Scholar

^{page 52 note 4} Mem. Dept. Agric. India, Chem. Series I (1908), p. 79.

^{page 53 note 1} Keen, B. A.Journ. Agric. Science, 9 (1918–1919), p. 396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

^{page 53 note 2} King, and Slichter, , loc. cit.Google Scholar

^{page 54 note 1} California Expt. Sta. Rept. (1892–4), p. 91.

^{page 54 note 2} Journ. Agric. Res., 10, (1917), p. 391.Google Scholar

^{page 54 note 3} See footnote, p. 50.

^{page 54 note 4} Landw. Vers. Stat. 69 (1908), p. 93.Google Scholar

^{page 54 note 5} U. S. Bureau of Soils, Bulls. 25 (1904) and 38 (1907).Google Scholar

^{page 55 note 1} Wisconsin Agric. Expt. Station, 7 (1890), p. 145.Google Scholar

^{page 55 note 2} Ann. Sci. Agron. (3 sér.) 4, I. (1909), p. 379.Google Scholar

^{page 55 note 3} U.S. Bureau of Soils, Bull. 52 (1908).Google Scholar

^{page 56 note 1} Nebraska Agric. Expt, Station Res., Bull. 3 (1913).Google Scholar

^{page 56 note 2} Journ. Agric. Res., 11 (1917), p. 147.Google Scholar

^{page 56 note 3} Landw. Vers. Stat., 59 (1904), p. 433.Google Scholar

^{page 56 note 4} Ztsch. Angew. Chem., 23 (1910), p. 1840.Google Scholar

^{page 57 note 1} Fühling's Landw. Ztg., 54 (1905), p. 673.Google Scholar

^{page 57 note 2} Landw. Vers. Stat., 75 (1911), p. 231.Google Scholar

^{page 57 note 3} Ztsch. Angew. Chem., 23 (1910), p. 1841.Google Scholar

^{page 57 note 4} Landw. Jahrb., 40 (1911), p. 645.Google Scholar

^{page 57 note 5} Inter. Mittl. Bodenk., 2 (1912), p. 463.Google Scholar

^{page 57 note 6} Amer. Journ. Sci., 7 (1874), p. 9.Google Scholar

^{page 58 note 1} Nebraska Agric. Expt. Sta. Res. Bull., 3 (1913).Google Scholar

^{page 58 note 2} Phil. Mag., 30 (1890), p. 285, p. 456CrossRefGoogle Scholar

^{page 58 note 3} Proc. Roy. Soc., 77 A (1906), p. 292; 79 A (1907), p. 383CrossRefGoogle Scholar

^{page 58 note 4} Journ. Agric. Science, 1 (1905–1906), p. 304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

^{page 59 note 1} Ann. Set. Agron. (3 sér.), 4, II. (1909), p. 393.Google Scholar

^{page 60 note 1} Mich. Agric. Coll. Tech. Bull., 42 (1918).Google Scholar

^{page 60 note 2} Journ. Landw., 46 (1898), p. 255; 48 (1900), p. 71.Google Scholar

^{page 61 note 1} Briggs, L. J. and Shantz, H. L.U.S. Bureau Plant Ind., Bull. 230 (1912).Google Scholar

^{page 61 note 2} Briggs, L. J. and McLane, J. W.U.S. Bureau of Soils, Bull. 45 (1907).Google Scholar

^{page 61 note 3} Journ. Agric. Res., 6 (1916), p. 833.Google Scholar

^{page 61 note 4} Loc. cit.

^{page 62 note 1} Ref. I, p. 58.

^{page 62 note 2} For a detailed summary of work on the wilting coefficient, which lies rather outside the scope of the present paper, seeBlackman, V. H. (Journ. Ecology, 2 (1914), p. 43). The papers of Alway and Shull should also be read in this connection.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

^{page 62 note 3} Journ. Agric. Res., 9 (1917), p. 27.Google Scholar

^{page 64 note 1} Journ. Agric. Sci., 8 (1916–1917), p. 312.Google Scholar

^{page 64 note 2} Encyclopédie Chemique. Frémy (Paris, 1885), 10, p. 67.Google Scholar

^{page 64 note 3} Koll. Zeit., 17 (1915), p. 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

^{page 66 note 1} Jonrn. Agric. Sci., 6 (1914), p. 456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

^{page 66 note 2} U.S. Bureau of Soils, Bull, 10 (1897).Google Scholar

^{page 66 note 3} Loc. cit.

^{page 67 note 1} The soils used in these experiments when ignited gave, on shaking the bottle, a cloud of fine particles, which floated away like smoke when the stopper was removed.

^{page 67 note 2} Bot. Gaz., 62 (1916), p. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

^{page 67 note 3} Introduction to Phys.Chem. 7th ed. 1913. Macmillan.Google Scholar

^{page 68 note 1} The various papers discussed in this connection appear in Michigan Agric. Coll. Expt. Station Technical Bulletins, Nos. 24 (1915); 31 (1916); 36 (1917); 42 (1918); and in theGoogle ScholarJourn. Agric. Res., 8 (1917), p. 195; 15 (1918), p. 331.Google Scholar

^{page 69 note 1} Journ. Amer. Oktm. Soc., 38 (1916), p. 583, and 39 (1917), p. 1103.Google Scholar

^{page 70 note 1} Keen, B. A.Jonrn. Agrin. Science. 9 (1918–1919), p. 400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

^{page 71 note 1} Summaries Of the various methods of extracting soil solution are given by Stiles and Jérgensen (Journ. Ecology, 2 (1914)), p. 245CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Bouyoucos, (Mich. Tech. Bull., 24 (1915)).Google Scholar

^{page 71 note 2} U.S. Bureau of Soils, Bull. 22 (1903).Google Scholar

^{page 71 note 3} A full account of work on the soil solution is given by Russell, E. J., in Soil Conditions and Plant Growth, 3rd ed. (1917), p. 104. LongmansGoogle Scholar. See also, by the same author, Chem. Soc. Ann. Reports, 15 (1918), p. 172 (“Agricultural Chemistry and Vegetable Physiology”), in which are discussed experiments at the University of California, giving results in opposition to the views of Whitney and Cameron.CrossRefGoogle Scholar