Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-11T18:12:03.634Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cross-national data on informal caregivers of older people with long-term care needs in the European population: time for a more coordinated and comparable approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2022

Aviad Tur-Sinai*
Affiliation:
Department of Health Systems Management, Max Stern Yezreel Valley College, Israel School of Nursing, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
Andrea Teti
Affiliation:
Institute for Gerontology, University of Vechta, Vechta, Germany
Alexander Rommel
Affiliation:
Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch-Institute, Berlin, Germany
Valentina Hlebec
Affiliation:
Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
Stecy Yghemonos
Affiliation:
Eurocarers, Brussels, Belgium
Giovanni Lamura
Affiliation:
INRCA IRCCS–National Institute of Health and Science on Ageing, Centre for Socio-Economic Research on Ageing, Ancona, Italy
*
*Corresponding author. Email: aviadt@yvc.ac.il

Abstract

To promote long-term care policies for older adults, accurate mapping of the often invisible and insufficiently recognized role of their informal caregivers is needed. This paper measures the prevalence of informal caregivers in the European population, illustrates current difficulties in gathering unequivocal information on this topic and deals with the scientific and policy implications of the problem. Using the European Health Interview Survey (EHIS), the European Quality of Life Survey (EQLS) and the Study on Health and Ageing in Europe (SHARE), the current difficulties in gathering unequivocal information on this topic are illustrated. In most countries, the share of informal caregivers varies, sometimes markedly, among the three surveys. As for the sex of caregivers, while confirming the well-known higher prevalence of caregivers among women than among men, large variations emerge across the three surveys in most countries in respect of the two sexes. The takeaway message of the paper is that it is urgent to promote international concerted action in gathering comprehensive informal caregiving information and/or exploring in greater depth the different intercultural understandings of informal care itself.

Type
Short Report
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AARP (2020) Caregiving in the United States 2020. National Alliance for Caregiving, Washington, DC, doi: 10.26419/ppi.00103.001 Google Scholar
Bom, J, Bakx, P, Schut, F and van Doorslaer, E (2019) The impact of informal caregiving for older adults on the health of various types of caregivers: a systematic review. Gerontologist 59, e629e642.Google ScholarPubMed
Börsch-Supan, A, Brandt, M, Hunkler, C, Kneip, T, Korbmacher, J, Malter, F et al. (2013) Data resource profile: the survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe (SHARE). International Journal of Epidemiology, doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt088 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chan, EYY, Gobat, N, Kim, JH, Newnham, EA, Huang, Z, Hung, H et al. (2020) Informal home care providers: the forgotten health-care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Lancet 395, 19571959.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ciccarelli, N and Van Soest, A (2018) Informal caregiving, employment status and work hours of the 50+ population in Europe. Diversifying and Decolonising Economics. De Economist 166, 363396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EC (2018) Informal Care in Europe. Exploring Formalisation, Availability and Quality. European Commission, Brussels. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=19681&langId=en (accessed 7th December 2021).Google Scholar
EC (2021) Long-Term Care Report. Trends, Challenges and Opportunities in an Ageing Society. Volume 1. Social Protection Committee (SPC) and the European Commission (DG EMPL), doi: 10.2767/677726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eurofound (2017) European Quality of Life Survey 2016. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, doi: 10.2806/964014 (accessed 16 December 2021).Google Scholar
Fiest, KM, McIntosh, CJ, Demiantschuk, D, Leigh, JP and Stelfox, HT (2018) Translating evidence to patient care through caregivers: a systematic review of caregiver-mediated interventions. BMC Medicine 16, 105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
OECD (2019) Health at a Glance 2019: OECD Indicators. OECD Publishing, Paris.Google Scholar
Phillips, D, Paul, G, Fahy, M et al. (2020) The invisible workforce during the COVID-19 pandemic: family carers at the frontline. HRB Open Research 3, 24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tur-Sinai, A, Teti, A, Rommel, A, Hlebec, V and Lamura, G (2020) How many older informal caregivers are there in Europe? Comparison of estimates of their prevalence from three European Surveys. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17(24), 9531.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
United Nations (2017) Expert Group Meeting on Care and Older Persons: Links to Decent Work, Migration and Gender. UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York. URL: https://www.un.org/development/desa/ageing/meetings-and-workshops-2/egm-care-and-older-persons.html (accessed 7th December 2021).Google Scholar
UNECE (2016) Recommendations on Ageing-related Statistics. URL: https://unece.org/statistics/publications/recommendations-ageing-related-statistics (accessed 7th December 2021).Google Scholar
Verbakel, E, Tamlagsrønning, S, Winstone, L, Fjær, EL and Eikemo, TA (2017) Informal care in Europe: findings from the European Social Survey (2014) special module on the social determinants of health. European Journal of Public Health 27 (Supplement 1), 9095.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, F, Moghaddam, N, Ramsden, S and De Boos, D (2019) Interventions for reducing levels of burden amongst informal carers of persons with dementia in the community: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Aging & Mental Health 23, 16291642.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed