Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-10T22:45:52.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The limits of acceptable family size: evidence from Melbourne, Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Helen Ware
Helen Ware
Affiliation:
Department of Demography, Australian National University, Canberra
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The data in this paper are drawn from interviews with a probability sample of 2652 once-married women under the age of 60 currently living with their husbands in 1971 in metropolitan Melbourne. Although drawing from other material from the 2½ hr interviews the discussion concentrates upon the family size ideals of these wives. In addition to the customary measures of ideal family size, new measures of the upper and lower limits of acceptable family size are described, together with the reactions of the whole sample to a wide range of specified family sizes and the reasons for accepting or rejecting them. It is shown that the eventual achievement of zero population growth will almost certainly depend upon the two-child family becoming the norm for the great majority of couples, since childless or one-child marriages are desired by only 2% of couples. Currently, however, 20% of wives consider two-child families to be undesirably small. The marked religious, country of origin and educational differentials in acceptance of the two-child family are also discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , July 1973 , pp. 309 - 328
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blake, J. (1966) Ideal family size among white Americans: a quarter of a century's evidence. Demography, 3, 154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, J.C. & Ware, H. (1973) The evolution of family planning in Australia. Popul. Stud. 27, 7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caldwell, J.C., Young, C.M., Ware, H., Lavis, D.R. & Davis, A. (1973) Australia: knowledge, attitudes and practice of family planning in Melbourne. Stud. Fam. Plann. (in press).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Commission On Population Growth And The American Future (1972) Population and the American Future. Government Printing Office, Washington.Google Scholar
Commonwealth Bureau Of Census And Statistics (1970) Demography: 1967 and 1968. Bulletin no. 85, Government Printer, Canberra.Google Scholar
Commonwealth Bureau Of Census And Statistics (1971) 1966 Census of Population and Housing (unpublished tabulations).Google Scholar
Day, L.H. (1965) Family size and fertility. In: Australian Society: A Sociological Introduction. Edited by Davies, A. F. and Encel, S.. F. W. Cheshire, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Day, L.H. (1968) Natality and ethnocentrism: some relations suggested by an analysis of Catholic—Protestant differentials. Popul. Stud. 22, 36.Google Scholar
Jones, E.F. (1971) Fertility decline in Australia and New Zealand. Popul. Index, 37, 301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirk, D. (1971) Some reflections of a sociologist-demographer on the need for psychological skills in family planning research. In: Proceedings of a Conference on Psychological Measurement in the Study of Population Problems. Institute of Personality Assessment and Research, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
McDonald, P.F. (1972) Age at First Marriage and Proportions Marrying in Australia, 1851–1971. Ph.D. thesis, Australian National University, Canberra.Google Scholar
Royal Commission On the Decline of the Birth-Rate and on the Mortality of Infants in New South Wales (1904) Report. Government Printer, Sydney.Google Scholar
Ryder, N.B. & Westoff, C.F. (1969) Relationships among intended, expected, desired, and ideal family size: United States, 1965. Centre for Population Research, Princeton.Google Scholar
Ryder, N.B. & Westoff, C.F. (1971) Reproduction in the United States 1965. Princeton University Press, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Spencer, G.M. (1971) Fertility trends in Australia. Demography, 7, 247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United States Bureau of the Census (1971) The Two-Child Family and Population Growth: An International View. Government Printing Office, Washington.Google Scholar