Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-10T23:16:32.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Socioeconomic Factors, Intermediate Variables and Fertility in Bangladesh

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Che-Fu Lee
Affiliation:
The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC, USA
Ruhul Amin
Affiliation:
The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC, USA

Summary

Cumulative fertility as measured by deviation from the natural fertility schedule is determined more by intermediate variables such as child mortality, the use of supplementary food, lactation, and husband's absence, than by the practice of fertility control using modern contraceptive methods. Socioeconomic factors like education, urban residence and the possession of household assets, though differentiating these intermediate variables of fertility, do not have direct effects on cumulative fertility among the sample of Bangladeshi women in the Bangladesh Fertility Survey. The effect of age, controlling for the effect of these intermediate variables, remains strongly negative, suggesting an early onset of subfecundity. The implications of these findings for fertility trends and differentials in recent decades are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1981, Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amin, R. (1979) Factors Differentiating Fertility in Bangladesh. PhD thesis, Department of Sociology, Catholic University of America, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Boulier, B. & Rosenzweig, M.R. (1978) Age, biological factors, and socioeconomic determinants of fertility: a new measure of cumulative fertility for use in the empirical analysis of family size. Demography, 15, 487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, L., Ahmed, S., Gesche, M. & Mosley, W.H. (1974) A prospective study of birth interval dynamics in rural Bangladesh. Popul. Stud. 28, 277.Google ScholarPubMed
Chowdhury, A.K.M.A., Aziz, A. & Mosley, W.H. (1970) Demographic Studies in Rural East Pakistan, Third Year, 1968–69. Pakistan-SEATO Cholera Research Laboratory, Dacca, Bangladesh.Google Scholar
Coale, A. & Trussel, J. (1974) Model fertility schedules: variations in the age structure of childbearing in human populations. Popul. Index, 40, 185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, K. & Blake, J. (1956) Social structure and fertility: an analytic framework. Econ. Dvlmt cult. Change, 4, 211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterlin, R.A. (1978) The economics and sociology of fertility: a synthesis. In: Historical Studies of Changing Fertility, pp. 57133. Edited by Tilly, C.. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Huffman, S.L., Chowdhury, A.K.M.A. & Mosley, W.H. (1978) Post-partum amenorrhoea: how is it affected by maternal nutritional status? Science, N.Y. 200, 1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joreskog, K.G. & Sorborn, D. (1978) LISREL IV. International Educational Services, Chicago.Google Scholar
Ryder, N.B. (1959) Fertility. In: The Study of Population: An Inventory and Appraisal. Edited by Hanser, P. & Duncan, O. D.. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
chultz, T.P. (1972) Retrospective evidence of a decline of fertility and child mortality in Bangladesh. Demography, 9, 415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sirageldin, I., Norris, D. & Ahmed, M. (1975) Fertility in Bangladesh: facts and fancies. Popul. Stud. 29, 207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoeckel, J. & Chowdhury, M.A. (1969) Differential fertility in a rural area of East Pakistan. Milbank meml Fund Q. Bull. 47, 189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Fertility Survey (1979) The Bangladesh Fertility Survey, 1975: A Summary of Findings. International Statistical Institute, Voorburg, Netherlands.Google Scholar