Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T14:17:38.642Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Child English pre-sentential negation as metalinguistic exclamatory sentence negation*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Kenneth F. Drozd
Kenneth F. Drozd*
Affiliation:
Max Planck-Institut fuer Psycholinguistik
*
Max-Planck-Institut fuer Psycholinguistik, Postbus 310, NL-6500 AH, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Email: DROZD@mpi.nl.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents a study of the spontaneous pre-sentential negations of ten English-speaking children between the ages of 1;6 and 3;4 which supports the hypothesis that child English nonanaphoric pre-sentential negation is a form of metalinguistic exclamatory sentence negation. A detailed discourse analysis reveals that children's pre-sentential negatives like No Nathaniel a king (i) are characteristically echoic, and (ii) typically express objection and rectification, two characteristic functions of exclamatory negation in adult discourse, e.g. Don't say ‘Nathaniel's a king’! A comparison of children's pre-sentential negations with their internal predicate negations using not and don't reveals that the two negative constructions are formally and functionally distinct. I argue that children's nonanaphoric pre-sentential negatives constitute an independent, well-formed class of discourse negation. They are not ‘primitive’ constructions derived from the miscategorization of emphatic no in adult speech or children's ‘inventions’. Nor are they an early derivational variant of internal sentence negation. Rather, these negatives reflect young children's competence in using grammatical negative constructions appropriately in discourse.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , October 1995 , pp. 583 - 610
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

I would like to thank Harald Baayen, Lois Bloom, Melissa Bowerman, Jill De Villiers, Larry Horn, Susan Powers, Wolfgang Klein, Tom Roeper, Catherine Snow and an anonymous reviewer for helpful comments and discussions regarding the ideas presented in this paper. Any mistakes and (mis)interpretations of data are my own. The research presented here is an extension of the author's dissertation research.

References

REFERENCES

Bellugi, U. (1967). The acquisition of negation. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Bloom, L. (1970) Language development: form and function in emerging grammars. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, L. (1991). Language development from two to three. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Bloom, L. & Lahey, M. (1978). Language development and language disorders. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bloom, L., Miller, P. & Hood, L. (1975). Variation and reduction as aspects of competence in language development. Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology 9, 3–55.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1976). Early semantic development: a cross-linguistic study with special reference to Finnish. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Braine, M. D. S. (1963). The ontogeny of English phrase structure: the first phase. Language 39, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. (1968). The development of wh- questions in child speech. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 7, 279–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: the early stages. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R., Cazden, C. & Bellugi, U. (1969). The child's grammar from I to III. In Hill, J. P. (ed.), Minnesota Symposium of Child Psychology, Volume 2. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Choi, S. (1988). The semantic development of negation: a cross-linguistic longitudinal study. Journal of Child Language 15, 517–31.Google Scholar
De Villiers, J. G. & De Villiers, P. (1985). The acquisition of English. In Slobin, D. I., (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. Vol. 1: The data. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
De Villiers, P. & De Villiers, J. G. (1979). Form and function in the development of sentence negation. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development 17, 57–64.Google Scholar
Deprez, V. & Pierce, A. (1993). Negation and functional projections in early grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 24, 25–67.Google Scholar
Drozd, K. F. (1992). Child language negation as evidence for the metalinguistic/descriptive split. Paper presented at the 28th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Drozd, K. F. (1993). A Unification Categorial Grammar of child English negation. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
Drozd, K. F. (1994). A discourse analysis of child English No. Paper presented at the Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Fletcher, P. & Garman, M. (1988). Normal language development and language impairment: syntax and beyond. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 2, 97–114.Google Scholar
Gleason, J. B., Perlmann, R. Y. & Greif, E. B. (1984). What's the magic word? Learning language through routines. Discourse Processes 6, 493–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenfield, P. M. & Smith, J. H. (1976). The structure of communication in early language development. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. (eds), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Horn, L. R. (1989). A natural history of negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ito, K. (1981). Two aspects of negation in child language. In Dale, P. S. & Ingram, D. (eds), Child language: an international perspective. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Keller-Cohen, D., Chalmer, K. C. & Remler, J. (1979). The development of discourse negation in the non-native child. In Ochs, E. & Schieffelin, B. (eds). Developmental pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Klima, E. S. & Bellugi, U. (1966). Syntactic regularities in the speech of children. In Lyons, J. & Wales, R. J. (eds), Psycholinguistic papers. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Lebeaux, D. S. (1988). Language acquisition and the form of the grammar. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Liberman, M. & Sag, I. (1974). Prosodic form and discourse function. CLS 10, 402–15.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. & Snow, C. (1985). The Child Language Data Exchange System. Journal of Child Language 12, 271–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCawley, J. D. (1991). Contrastive negation and metalinguistic negation. In Dobrin, L., Nichols, L. & Rodriguez, R. M. (eds), CLS 17: Papers from the 27th regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society 1991. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (1970). The acquisition of language. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Miller, W. & Ervin, S. (1964). The development of grammar in child language. In U. Bellugi & R. Brown (eds), The acquisition of language. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Language 29, 9–34.Google Scholar
Ochs, E. & Schieflelin, B. (1979). Developmental pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Pea, R. (1980). The development of negation in early language. In Olson, D. R. (ed.), Social foundations of language and thought: essays in honor of Jerome S. Bruner. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Pierce, A. (1992). Language acquisition and syntactic theory: a comparative analysis of French and English child grammars. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radford, A. (1990). Syntactic theory and the acquisition of English syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Roeper, T. (1992). Acquisition architecture: from triggers to trees in the realization of IP and CP. In Meisel, J. (ed.), The acquisition of verb placement: functional categories and V2 phenomena in language acquisition. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Shatz, M. & McCloskey, L. (1984). Answering appropriately: a developmental perspective on conversational knowledge. In Kuczaj, S. A. II (ed.), Discourse development: progress in cognitive developmental research. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Stromswold, K. J. (1990). Learnability and the acquisition of auxiliaries. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Suppes, P. (1973). The semantics of children's language. American Psychologist 88, 103–14.Google Scholar
Tottie, G. (1982). Where do negative sentences come from? Studia Linguistica 36, 88–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volterra, V. & Antinucci, F. (1979). Negation in child language. A pragmatic study. In Ochs, E. & Schieffelin, B. (eds), Developmental pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Warren-Leubecker, , & Bohannon, J. (1984). Language in society: variation and adaptation. In Gleason, J. B. (ed.) The development of language. Columbus, OH: Merrill.Google Scholar
Wells, C. G. (1981). Learning through interaction: the study of language development. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Wiche, R. T. P. (1991). External and verb phrase negation in actual dialogues. Journal of Semantics 8, 107–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar