Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T12:27:06.596Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Communicative functions of pitch range and pitch direction in infants*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Haydée Marcos
Haydée Marcos*
Affiliation:
Université Paris V (C.N.R.S.)
*
Laboratoire de Psychologic du Developpement et de l'Education de l'Enfant, Université Paris V (C.N.R.S.), 46 rue Saint-Jacques, 75005 Paris, France.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The communicative functions of pitch direction and pitch range during the second year were investigated. The research focusses on initial plus repeated requests, either for objects or for co-operation, which were contrasted against giving, showing and labelling. Infants aged 1; 2 to 1;10 were observed in interaction with their mothers in a semistructured situation. Vocalizations were coded separately for communicative function and for prosodic features. Results show that pitch range is consistently higher (1) for repeated requests than for initial requests for objects and (2) for initial requests for objects and for co-operation than for labelling. Giving and showing have an intermediate rank between requests and labelling. Trends in prosodic contours were observed in both requests and labelling: rising tones were more frequently associated with requests whereas falling tones appeared more often in conjunction with labelling.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , June 1987 , pp. 255 - 268
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This study was supported by a grant from the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (France) to F. Jodelet, M. le Rouzo and H. Marcos. The research was carried out when the author was located at the Laboratoire de Psycho-Biologie de l'Enfant (Paris). The author wishes to thank particularly Anna Pezé who made valuable contributions to carrying out the experiment and to its coding and analysis.

References

Abecassis, J. & Tardy, M. (1978) Intonation et communication. Bulletin de Psychologie 31. 572–80.Google Scholar
Bates, E. (1979) The emergence of symbols. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bates, E., Camaioni, L. & Volterra, V. (1975) The acquisition of performatives prior to speech. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 21. 205–26.Google Scholar
Boysson-Bardies, B. de., Bacri, N., Sagart, L. & Poizat, M. (1981) Timing in late babbling. Journal of Child Language 8. 525–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruner, J., Roy, C. & Ratner, N. (1982) The beginnings of request. In Nelson, K. E. (ed.), Children's language. Vol. 3. New York: Garden Press.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. (1973) Non-segmental phonology in language acquisition: a review of the issues. Lingua 32. 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crystal, D. (1979) Prosodic development. In Fletcher, P. & Garman, M. (eds), Language acquisition. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
D'Odorico, L., Benelli, B., Lavorato, C. & Simion, F. (1980) The origin of the informative function in child language. The Italian Journal of Psychology 7. 167–81.Google Scholar
D'Odorico, L. (1984) Non-segmental features of prelinguistic communication: an analysis of some types of infant cry and non-cry vocalizations. Journal of Child Language 11. 17–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dore, J. (1974) A pragmatic description-of early language development. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 4. 343–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dore, J., Franklin, M. B., Miller, R. T. & Ramer, R. H. (1976) Transitional phenomena in early language acquisition. Journal of Child Language 9. 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franco, F. & D'Odorico, L. (1986) The problem of continuity: the sound-meaning regularities in infant vocalizations. Paper presented at the Second European Conference on Developmental Psychology, Rome.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1975) Learning how to mean: exploration in the development of language. London: Edward Arnold.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1979) One child's protolanguage. In Bullowa, M. (ed.), Before speech. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Konopczynski, G. (1985) Acquisition du langage. La période charnière et sa structuration mélodique. Bulletin d'Audiophonologie, Annales Scientifiques de l'Université de Franche-Comté 1. 63–92.Google Scholar
Menn, L. (1976) Pattern, control and contrast in beginning speech. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Rossi, M., di Cristo, A., Hirst, D., Martin, Ph. & Nishinuma, Y. (1981) L'intonation. De l'acoustique a la semantique. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Siegel, S. (1956) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences. Tokyo: McGraw-Hill Kogakusha.Google Scholar
Weeks, T. E. (1980) Intonation as an early marker of meaning. In Key, M. E. (ed.). The relationship of verbal and non-verbal communication. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Weir, R. H. (1962) Language in the crib. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar