Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T15:44:10.362Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Development of forms and functions of negation in the early stages of language acquisition: a study in Tamil*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

R. Vaidyanathan*
Affiliation:
Nair Hospital, Bombay
*
Audiology and Speech Therapy School Nair Hospital, Bombay-400 008, India.

Abstract

The development of forms and functions of negation in parent–child interactions in the early stages of language acquisition is discussed with illustrative examples from field data relating to two Tamil-speaking children and their parents. An attempt is made to provide a scheme for analysing the negatives in children's speech, maintaining the three basic functions of Bloom (1970) unaltered. Subcategories of these functions are introduced, taking into consideration the interactional situations as they are perceived by the parents and children. Children, it is observed, acquire the forms and functions of negation in a clear developmental sequence. They acquire and use the free forms naanaa (veeṇḍaam) ‘No, I don't want’ first, followed by negatives involving bound forms. Certain forms like maaṭṭeen ‘I won't’, muḍiyaadi' I can't’ and even veeṇḍaam are used in isolation (as free forms) first. Only later are they used with verb infinitives. The development of functions of negation follows the sequence: rejection, non-existence, prohibition and denial. Thus the children of this study show preference for rejection over non-existence as observed by earlier scholars.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I express my sincere thanks to Professor R. Narasimhan, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research for his guidance and valuable suggestions in the preparation of this paper. I would like to thank the Dean T. N. Medical College for her kind permission to carry out this study.

References

REFERENCES

Aksu-Koc, A. & Slobin, D. I. (1985). The acquisition of Turkish. In Slobin, D. I., (ed.) The crosslingtiistic study of language acquisition. Vol. 1. The data. Hillsadle, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bellugi, U. (1967). The acquisition of negation. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Bloom, L. M. (1970). Language development: form and function in emerging grammars. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, L. M. & Lahey, M. (1978). Language development and language disorder. New York: John WileyGoogle Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1973). Early syntactic development: a cross-linguistic study with special reference to Finnish. London: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Clancy, P. (1985). The acquisition of Japanese. In Slobin, D. I., (ed.) The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition. Vol 1. The data. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
de Villiers, P. A. & de Villiers, J. G. (1979). Form and function in the development of sentence negation. Papers and Reports of Child Language Development 17. 5764. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Gleason, J. B. & Weintraub, S. (1978). Input language and the acquisition of communicative competence. In Nelson, K. E. (ed.) Children's language. Vol. 1. New York: Gardner Press.Google Scholar
Klima, E. S. & Bellugi, U. (1966). Syntactic regularities in the speech of children. In Lyons, J. & Wales, R. J. (eds) Psycholinguistic papers. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University PressGoogle Scholar
Lakshmi Bai, B. (1986). Development of negation in Tamil-Telugu Bilingual Children. In Fishman, J. A., Keller, A. T., Clyne, M., Krishnamurthi, Bh. & Abdulaziz, M. (eds). The Ferguson impact. Vol. 1: From phonology to society. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lehman, T. (1989). A grammar of modern Tamil. Pondicherry: Pondicherry Institute of Linguistics and CultureGoogle Scholar
Lord, C. (1974). Variations in the acquisition of negation. Papers and Reports of Child Language Development 8. 7886. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (1970). The acquisition of language: the study of developmental psycholinguistics. New York: Harper & RowGoogle Scholar
McNeill, D. & McNeill, N. B. (1973). What does a child mean when he says ‘No?’. In Ferguson, C. A. & Slobin, D. I. (eds). Studies of child language development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & WinstonGoogle Scholar
Pea, R. D. (1979). The development of negation in early child language. In Olson, D. R. (ed.) The social foundations of language and thought: essays in honor of J. S. Bruner. New York: NortonGoogle Scholar
Shanmugam Pillai, M. (1965). Spoken Tamil. Part I, Annamalai Nagar: Annamalai UniversityGoogle Scholar
Shanmugam Pillai, M. (1968). Spoken Tamil. Part II. Annamalai Nagar: Annamalai UniversityGoogle Scholar
Vaidyanathan, R. (1985). Verbal environment in early language acquisition: pragmatic approach. Doctoral dissertation, Bombay University.Google Scholar