Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-10T23:47:26.656Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Expression of the part–whole semantic relation by 3- to 12-year-old children*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Bonnie E. Litowitz  and
Forrest A. Novy
Bonnie E. Litowitz
Affiliation:
Erikson Institute
Forrest A. Novy
Affiliation:
Universidade Católica do Paraná
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present study investigated the expression of the part–whole semantic relation by children 3 to 12 years of age. Controlling both task format (structured vs. open-ended) and dimensions associated with experimental stimuli (part-word vs. part-object; known whole vs. unknown whole), the verbal responses of two age groups of children were analysed. While results revealed the part–whole semantic relation expressible by even the youngest children, age-group comparisons indicated that the older children preferred its use significantly more often. The part–whole semantic relation was also observed to take several linguistic forms (partitive, spatial, possessive), the selection of which varied as a function of age, task format, and type of experimental stimuli. Findings are discussed relative to issues concerning research methodology, the elicitation and assessment of children's semantic knowledge, and cognitive developmental theory.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , February 1984 , pp. 159 - 178
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Al-Issa, I. (1969). The development of word definition in children. JGenPsychol 114. 25–8.Google Scholar
Anglin, J. (1977). Word, object and conceptual development. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar
Bloom, L. & Lahey, M. (1978). Language development and language disorders. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: the early stages. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, D. (1973). Ostensive instances and entitativity in language learning. In Gray, W. & Rizzo, N. D. (eds), Unity through diversity: a Festschrift for Ludwig von Bertalanffy. New York: Gordon & Breach.Google Scholar
Casagrande, J. B. & Hale, K. L. (1967). Semantic relationships in Papago folk-definitions. In Hymes, D. (ed.), Studies in southwestern ethnolinguistics. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. L. (1970). Meaning and the structure of language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Collins, A. & Quillian, M. R. (1972). How to make a language user. In Tulving, E. & Donaldson, W. (eds), Organization of memory. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cromer, R. F. (1976). The cognitive hypothesis of language acquisition and its implications for child language deficiency. In Morehead, D. M. & Morehead, A. E. (eds), Normal and deficient child language. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Cruse, D. A. (1979). On the transitivity of the part–whole relation. JL 15. 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evens, M., Litowitz, B., Markowitz, J., Smith, R. & Werner, O. (1980). Lexical–semantic relations: a comparative survey. Edmonton: Linguistic Research Inc.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. (1970). Language structure and language function. In Lyons, J. (ed.), Mew horizons in linguistics. Baltimore: Penguin.Google Scholar
Heidenheimer, P. (1978). A comparison of the roles of exemplar, action, coordinate and superordinate relations in the semantic processing of 4- and 5-year-old children. JExpChPsychol 25. 289–304.Google Scholar
Inhelder, B. & Piaget, J. (1964). The early growth of logic in the child: classification and seriation. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P. N. & Wason, P. C. (eds). (1977). Thinking: readings in cognitive science. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Kintsch, W. (1972). Notes on the structure of semantic memory. In Tulving, E. & Donaldson, W. (eds), Organization of memory. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kirk, S. A., McCarthy, J. J. & Kirk, W. D. (1968). Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Ability. (Revised edition). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Litowitz, B. (1977). Learning to make definitions. JChLang 4. 289–304.Google Scholar
Litowitz, B. (1981). Hypothetical speech: a developmental perspective. JPsycholingRes 10.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics, Vol. 1. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Markman, E. (1973). The facilitation of part–whole comparisons by use of the collective noun ‘family’. ChDev 44. 837–40.Google Scholar
Markman, E. (1978). Empirical versus logical solutions to part-whole comparison problems. ChDt 49. 168–77.Google Scholar
Markman, E., Horton, M. S. & McLanahan, A. G. (1980). Classes and collections: principles of organization in the learning of hierarchical relations. Cognition 8. 227–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Markman, E. & Seibert, J. (1976). Classes and collections: internal organization and resultin holistic properties. CogPsychol 8. 561–77.Google Scholar
McCarthy, D. (1954). Language development in children. In Carmichael, L. (ed.), Manual of child psychology, 2nd edn.New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Miller, G. (1974). Towards a third metaphor for psycholinguistics. In Weimer, W. B.Palermo, D. S. (eds), Cognition and the symbolic process. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Miller, G. (1978). Some relations among words. In Halle, M., Bresnan, J. & Miller, G. (eds), Linguistic theory and psychological reality. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Miller, G. & Johnson-Laird, P. (1976). Language and perception. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvar University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, K. (1978). Semantic development and the development of semantic memory. In Nelson, K. (ed.), Children's language, Vol. 1. New York: Gardner Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. & Brown, A. L. (1978). The semantic–episodic distinction in memory developmen. In Ornstein, P. A. (ed.), Memory development in children. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Palmer, F. R. (1976). Semantics: a new outline. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Petrey, S. (1977). Word associations and the development of lexical memory. Cognition 5. 57–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B. (1969). The psychology of the child. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Riegel, K. (1968). Some theoretical considerations of bilingual development. PsychBull 71. 647–70.Google Scholar
Riegel, K. (1970). The acquisition process: a reinterpretation of selected research findings. In Goulet, L. R. & Baltes, P. B. (eds), Life-span developmental psychology: research and theory. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Smith, R. (1981). Conceptual primitives in the English lexicon. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In Tulving, E. & Donaldson, W. (eds), Organization of memory. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
White, S. H. (1965). Evidence for a hierarchical arrangement of learning processes. In Lipsitt, L. P. & Spiker, C. C. (eds), Advances in child behavior and development, Vol. 2. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Winer, G. A. (1980). Class-inclusion reasoning in children: a review of the empirical literatur. ChDev 51. 309–28.Google Scholar
Wolman, R. N. & Barker, E. N. (1965). A developmental study of word definition. JGenPsychol 107. 159–66.Google Scholar
Zaporozhets, A. V. & Elkonin, D. B. (1971). The psychology of preschool children. Cambridg Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar