Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T07:10:45.770Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The relation of maternal language to variation in rate and style of language acquisition*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

June Hampson  and
Katherine Nelson
June Hampson*
Affiliation:
The University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey
Katherine Nelson
Affiliation:
The Graduate School and University Center of the CityUniversity of New York
*
Address for correspondence: UMDNJ-CMHC at Piscataway, Social Problem-Solving Program, 240 Skelton Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854–3248, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The main thrust of this paper is to question whether in earlier studies the ‘motherese hypothesis’ has been adequately tested. The present study first explores concurrent relations between maternal and child language at an early age, using the Soyder, Bates & Bretherton (1981) questionnaire to assess vocabulary at 1;1. With a large sample of 45 subjects, videotaped at 1;1 and 1;8, it was possible to analyse earlier talkers separately from later talkers. The results indicate pre-existing differences between the mothers of earlier and later talkers as early as 1;1 – some 5 months before other studies have examined the possible facilitative effects of ‘motherese’. Secondly, and perhaps more importantly, when the sample was divided according to stylistic preference at 1;8, several associations between maternal language at 1;1 and MLU at 1;8 emerged for the non-expressive group which were non-existent for the expressive group. These results imply that earlier studies may have been looking for the effectiveness of maternal input too late. Moreover, it may continue to be difficult to demonstrate consistent effects of child-directed speech as long as researchers continue to ignore individual differences in style of language acquisition.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , June 1993 , pp. 313 - 342
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

This research was supported by a National Graduate Fellowship from the U.S. Department of Education and an Individual Predoctoral NRSA Fellowship (No. 1 F3I MH 09494-01) from the National Institute of Mental Health to the first author.

References

REFERENCES

Barnes, S., Gutfreund, M., Satterly, D. & Wells, G. (1983). Characteristics of adult speech which predict children's language development. Journal of Child Language 10, 65–84.Google Scholar
Bates, E., Bretherton, I. & Snyder, L. (1988). From first words to grammar: individual differences and dissociable mechanisms. New York: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Bloom, L. (1970). Language development: form and function in emerging grammars. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, L. (1973). One word at a time: the use of single-word utterances before syntax. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Bretherton, I., McNew, S., Snyder, L. & Bates, E. (1983). Individual differences at 20 months: analytic and holistic strategies in language acquisition. Journal of Child Language 10, 293–320.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: the early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20, 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dellacorte, M., Benedict, H. & Klein, D. (1983). The relationship of pragmatic dimensions of mother's speech to the referential expressive distinction. Journal of Child Language 10, 35–43.Google Scholar
Fernald, A. (1989). Intonation and communicative intent in mothers' speech to infants: is the melody the message? Child Development 60, 1497–1510.Google Scholar
Fernald, A., Taeschner, T., Dunn, J., Papousek, M., De Boysson-Bardies, B. & Fukui, I. (1989). A cross-language study of prosodie modifications in mothers’ and fathers’ speech to preverbal infants. Journal of Child Language 16, 477–501.Google Scholar
Folger, J. P. & Chapman, R. S. (1978). A pragmatic analysis of spontaneous imitations. Journal of Child Language 5, 25–38.Google Scholar
Furrow, D. & Nelson, K. (1984). Environmental correlates of individual differences in language acquisition. Journal of Child Language 11, 523–34.Google Scholar
Furrow, D., Nelson, K. & Benedict, H. (1979). Mothers' speech to children and syntactic development: some simple relationships. Journal of Child Language 6, 423–42.Google Scholar
Gleitman, L., Newport, E. & Gleitman, H. (1984). The current status of the motherese hypothesis. Journal of Child Language 11, 43–79.Google Scholar
Hampson, J. (1988). Individual differences in style of language acquisition in relation to social networks. In Salzinger, S., Antrobus, J. & Hammer, M. (eds), Social networks of children, adolescents, and college students. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hampson, J. (1989). Elements of style: maternal and child contributions to the referential and expressive styles of language acquisition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, City University of New York.Google Scholar
Hoff-Ginsberg, E. (1989). Effects of social class and interactive setting on maternal speech. Poster session at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Kansas City.Google Scholar
Hollingshead, A. B. (1975). The four-factor index of social status. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Klein, D. (1980). Expressive and referential communication in children's early language development: the relationship to mother's communicative styles. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University.Google Scholar
Longtin, S. (1984). The relationship between functional orientation and early lexical development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, City University of New York.Google Scholar
McDonald, L. & Pien, D. (1982). Mother conversational behavior as a function of interactional intent. Journal of Child Language 9, 337–58.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (1973). Structure and strategy in learning to talk. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 38 (1–2, Serial No. 149).Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (1981). Individual differences in language development: implications for development and language. Developmental Psychology 17, 170–87.Google Scholar
Newport, E., Gleitman, H. & Gleitman, L. (1977). Mother, I'd rather do it myself: some effects and non-effects of maternal speech style. In Snow, C. E. & Ferguson, D. (eds), Talking Co children: language input and acquisition. New York: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Olsen-Fulero, L. (1982). Style and stability in mother conversational behaviour: a study of individual differences. Journal of Child Language 9, 543–64.Google Scholar
Scarborough, H. & Wyckoff, J. (1986). Mother, I'd still rather do it myself: some further noneffects of ‘motherese’. Journal of Child Language 13, 431–7.Google Scholar
Shatz, M. (1982). On mechanisms of language acquisition: can features of the communicative environment account for development? In Wanner, E. & Gleitman, L. R. (eds), Language acquisition: the state of the art. New York: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Shatz, M. & Gelman, R. (1973). The development of communication skills: modifications in the speech of young children as a function of listener. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 38 (5, Serial No. 152).Google Scholar
Shute, B. & Wheldall, K. (1989). Pitch alterations in British motherese: some preliminary acoustic data. Journal of Child Language 16, 503–12.Google Scholar
Snow, C. E. (1986). Conversations with children. In Fletcher, P. & Garman, M. (eds), Language acquisition. Second edition. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Snyder, L., Bates, E. & Bretherton, I. (1981). Content & context in early lexical development. Journal of Child Language 8, 565–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wells, G. (1985). Language development in the pre-school years. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Wells, G. (1986). Variation in child language. In Fletcher, P. & Garman, M. (eds), Language acquisition. Second edition. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Wolf, D. & Gardner, H. (1979). Style and sequence in early symbolic play. In Smith, N. R. & Franklin, M. B. (eds), Symbolic functioning in childhood. Hillsdale, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar