Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-06-02T14:43:54.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Speech discrimination in the language-innocent and the language-wise: a study in the perception of voice onset time*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Rebecca E. Eilers ,
Wesley R. Wilson  and
John M. Moore
Rebecca E. Eilers
Affiliation:
University of Miami
Wesley R. Wilson
Affiliation:
University of Washington
John M. Moore
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Discrimination of synthetically produced stimuli differing along the voice onset time continuum was assessed for infants and adults within the context of the Visually Reinforced Infant Speech Discrimination (VRISD) paradigm. English-learning infants' discrimination abilities were compared with two groups of English-speaking adults (a phonetically naive and a phonetically sophisticated group). Contrary to the predictions of the innateness hypothesis, English-learning infants showed evidence of discrimination only across the English phoneme boundary. Adults, on the other hand, were very successful in discriminating both across and within a range of phoneme boundaries. These results are discussed in terms of the presumed relationship between categorical perception and linguistic processing and in terms of synthetic speech continua.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , February 1979 , pp. 1 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

This work was supported by NICHD contract number HD-3-2793 at the Child Development and Mental Retardation Center at the University of Washington, and by NICHD grant number HD-09906-02 at the Mailman Center for Child Development at the University of Miami. The authors wish to express their appreciation to Dr Michael Dorman for providing the synthetic stimuli used in this study, and to Dr D. Kimbrough Oller for help with the preparation of this manuscript. Address for correspondence: Dr Rebecca E. Eilers, Mailman Center for Child Development, University of Miami, P.O. Box 520006 – Biscayne Annex, Miami, Florida 33152.

References

REFERENCES

Abramson, A. S. & Lisker, L. (1970). Discriminability along the voicing continuum: cross-language tests. In Proc. VI Int. Cong. Phon. Sci. 1967. Prague: Academia.Google Scholar
Butterfield, E. & Cairns, G. (1974). Whether infants perceive linguistically is uncertain, and if they did, its practica limportance would be equivocal. In Schiefelbusch, R. & Lloyd, L. (eds), Language perspectives: acquisition, retardatian and intervention. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Cutting, J. & Rosner, B. (1974). Categories and boundaries in speech and music. PerceptPsychophys 19. 564–70.Google Scholar
Eilers, R., Gavin, W. & Wilson, W. (in press). Linguistic experience and phonemic perception in infancy: a crosslinguistic study. ChDev 21.Google Scholar
Eilers, R. & Minifie, F. (1975). Fricative discrimination in early infancy. JSpHearRes 18. 158–67.Google Scholar
Eilers, R., Wilson, W. R. & Moore, J. M. (1977). Developmental changes in speech discrimination in infants. JSpHearRes 20. 766–80.Google Scholar
Eimas, P. (1974). Linguistic processing of speech by young infants. In Schiefelbusch, R. & Lloyd, L. (eds), Language perspectives: acquisition, retardation and intervention. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Eimas, P., Siqueland, E., Jusczyk, P. & Vigorito, J. (1971). Speech perception in infants. Science 171. 303–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jusczyk, P., Rosner, B., Cutting, J., Foard, C. & Smith, L. (1977). Categorical perception of non-speech sounds by two-month-old-infants. PerceptPsychophys 27. 50–4.Google Scholar
Kuhl, P. & Miller, J. (1975). Speech perception by the chinchilla: voiced-voiceless distinction in alveolar plosive consonants. Science 190. 69–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lasky, R., Syrdal-Lasky, A. & Klein, D. (1975). VOT discrimination by four- to-six- month-old infants from Spanish environments. JExpChPsych 20. 215–25.Google ScholarPubMed
Lisker, A. S. & Abramson, L. (1964). A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: acoustical measurements. Word 20. 304–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, C., Morse, P. & Dorman, M. (in press). Cardiac studies of infant speech perception: orienting and burst discrimination. QJExpPsych.Google Scholar
Moffitt, A. R. (1971). Consonant cue perception in twenty- to twenty-four-week-old infants. ChDev 42. 717–31.Google Scholar
Morse, P. (1972). The discrimination of speech and non-speech stimuli in early infancy. JExpChPsych 14. 447–92.Google Scholar
Morse, P. (1974). Infant speech perception: a preliminary model and review of the literature. In Schiefelbusch, R. & Lloyd, L. (eds), Language perspectives: acquisition, retardation and intervention. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Pisoni, D. & Lazarus, J. (1974). Categorical and non-categorical modes of speech perception along the voicing continuum. JAcS 55. 328–33.Google Scholar
Smith, B. L. & Westbury, J. R. (1975). Temporal control of voicing during occlusion in plosives. Paper presented at the 89th meeting of the Acoustical Society of America Texas.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spring, D. R. & Dale, P. S. (1977) Discrimination of linguistic stress in early infancy. JSpHearRes 20. 224–31.Google ScholarPubMed
Stevens, K. & Klatt, D. (1974). Role of formant transitions in the voiced-voiceless distinctions for stops. JAcS 55. 653–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Streeter, L. (1976). Language perception of two-month-old infants show effects of both innate mechanisms and experience. Nature 259. 39–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trehub, S. (1973). Infants' sensitivity to vowel and tonal contrasts. DevPsych 9. 91–6.Google Scholar