Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-23T04:53:47.537Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

47 Cross-ancestry GWAS meta-analysis of keloids discovers novel susceptibility loci in diverse populations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 April 2024

Catherine Anne Greene
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Gabrielle Hampton
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Gail P. Jarvik
Affiliation:
University of Washington Medical Center
Bahram Namjou-Khales
Affiliation:
Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center
Atlas Khan
Affiliation:
Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University
Yuan Luo
Affiliation:
Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine
Todd L. Edwards
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Digna R. Velez Edwards
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Jacklyn N. Hellwege
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: We aimed to conduct an updated genome-wide meta-analysis of keloids in expanded populations, including those most afflicted by keloids. Our overall objective was to improve understanding of keloid development though the identification and further characterization of keloid-associated genes with genetically predicted gene expression (GPGE). METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We used publicly available summary statistics from several large-scale DNA biobanks, including the UK Biobank, FinnGen, and Biobank Japan. We also leveraged data from the Million Veterans Program and performed genome-wide association studies of keloids in BioVU and eMERGE. For each of these datasets, cases were determined from ICD-9/ICD-10 codes and phecodes. With these data we conducted fixed effects meta-analysis, both across ancestries and stratified by broad ancestry groups. This approach allowed us to consider cumulative evidence for genetic risk factors for keloids and explore potential ancestry-specific components of risk. We used FUMA for functional annotation of results and LDSC to estimate ancestry-specific heritability. We performed GPGE analysis using S-PrediXcan with GTEx v8 tissues. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: We detected 30 (23 novel) genomic risk loci in the cross-ancestry analysis. Major risk loci were broadly consistent between ancestries, with variable effects. Keloid heritability estimates from LDSC were 6%, 21%, and 34% for European, East Asian, and African ancestry, respectively. The top hit (P = 1.7e-77) in the cross-ancestry analysis was at a replicated variant (rs10863683) located downstream of LINC01705. GPGE analysis identified an association between decreased risk of keloids and increased expression of LINC01705 in fibroblasts (P = 3.6e10-20), which are important in wound healing. The top hit in the African-ancestry analysis (P = 5.5e-31) was a novel variant (rs34647667) in a conserved region downstream of ITGA11. ITGA11 encodes a collagen receptor and was previously associated with uterine fibroids. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: This work significantly increases the yield of discoveries from keloid genetic association studies, describing both common and ancestry-specific effects. Stark differences in heritability support a potential adaptive origin for keloid disparities. Further work will continue to examine keloids in the broader context of other fibrotic diseases.

Type
Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Research Design
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. The Association for Clinical and Translational Science