Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T19:13:28.938Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A compartmental model describing changes in progesterone concentrations during the oestrous cycle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

Susanne Meier ,
John R Roche ,
Eric S Kolver  and
Ray C Boston
Susanne Meier*
Affiliation:
DairyNZ Ltd, Hamilton, New Zealand
John R Roche
Affiliation:
DairyNZ Ltd, Hamilton, New Zealand
Eric S Kolver
Affiliation:
DairyNZ Ltd, Hamilton, New Zealand Synlait, PO Box 9466, Hamilton, New Zealand
Ray C Boston
Affiliation:
Biostatistics Section, New Bolton Centre, Kennett Square, University of Pennsylvania, USA
*
*For correspondence; e-mail: Susanne.Meier@DairyNZ.co.nz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The objective of this study was to develop a mathematical model that accurately describes the rise and decline in plasma progesterone concentrations, and is able to define parameters describing progesterone appearance and disappearance during the bovine oestrous cycle. Daily plasma progesterone data from 27 cows were used to develop a compartmental model consisting of an appearance function and an appearance modulating function. Model outputs included an apparent appearance or secretion duration, appearance rate and an average disappearance rate (expressed as arbitrary units per day; units/d). Shape-based clustering identified three common shape-based groups (or clusters) of progesterone profiles defined as either ‘peaked’ profile, with the profile reaching a distinguishable peak, 'structured', with the profile exhibiting a wave-like pattern, or ‘flat top’, with the profile reaching a plateau. Differences in the model parameters for the three different shapes of progesterone profiles were examined: peaked (n=13), flat top (n=7) and structured (n=7). The mean duration of apparent appearance was 11·49 (sd 0·17 d) for all 27 profiles. The model estimates for total appearance of progesterone (area under the curve; ng/ml per cycle), mean appearance rate and maximum appearance rate were 69·04 ng/ml per cycle (sd 15·2 ng/ml per cycle), 3·19 ng/ml per cycle (sd 0·7 ng/ml per d) and 6·70 ng/ml (sd 1·31 ng/ml), respectively. The average disappearance rate was 1·0 units/d (sd 0·04 units/d). The apparent appearance duration was greatest (P<0·01) in the flat top profiles (12·54, sd 0·41 d) followed by the structured (11·77, sd 0·66 d) and the peaked (10·80, sd 0·30 d) profiles. Total and mean progesterone appearance, maximum progesterone appearance rate, and the progesterone disappearance rates were not different between the profiles. The model successfully simulated all components of the progesterone profile and was able to define specific parameters of different shaped progesterone profiles. A simple model able to estimate parameters describing progesterone appearance and disappearance can be used to explore the relationships between profile shapes and reproductive outcomes.

Keywords

Modelprogesteroneprofileoestrous cyclebovine
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 76 , Issue 2 , May 2009 , pp. 249 - 256
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bergman, RN, Ider, YZ, Bowden, CR & Cobelli, C 1979 Quantitiative estimation of insulin sensitivity. American Journal of Physiology 236 E667–E677Google Scholar
Bogumil, RJ, Ferin, M, Rootenberg, J, Speroff, L & WandeWiele, RL 1972 Mathematical studies on the human menstrual cycle. I Formulation of a Mathematical Model. Jouranl of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 35 126–143CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Claycomb, RW & Delwiche, MJ 1998 Biosensor for on-line measurement of bovine progesterone during milking. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 13 1173–1180CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooperative Regional Research Project NE-161 1996 Relationship of fertility to patterns of ovarian follicular development and associated hormonal profiles in dairy cows and heifers. Journal of Animal Science 74 1943–1952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cushman, RA, Allan, MF, Thallman, RM & Cundiff, LV 2007 Characterisation of biological types of cattle (Cycle VII): Influence of postpartum interval and oestrous cycle length on fertility. Journal of Animal Science 85 2156–2162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, DJ 1978 Numerical deconvolution by least squares: use of prescribed input functions. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmacology 6 227–241CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dalla Man, C, Caumo, A & Cobelli, C 2002 The oral glucose minimal model: estimation of insulin sensitivity from a meal test. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 49 419–429CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delwiche, MJ, Tang, X, BonDurant, RH & Munro, CJ 2001 Improved biosensor for measurement of progesterone in bovine milk. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 44 1997–2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everitt, BS, Landau, S & Leese, M 2001 Cluster Analysis, 4th Edition Oxford University Press, USA: A Hodder Arnold PublicationGoogle Scholar
Friggens, NC & Chagunda, MG 2005 Prediction of the reproductive status of cattle on the basis of milk progesterone measures: model description. Theriogenology 64 155–190CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gould, W 1993 Resistant nonlinear smoothing using Stata. Stata Technical Bulletin Reprints ST7–ST12 104–107Google Scholar
Harris Clark, LA, Schlosser, EC & Selgrade, JF 2003 Multiple stable periodic solutions in e model for hormonal control of the menstrual cycle. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 65 157–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inskeep, EK 2004 Preovulatory, postovulatory, and postmaternal recognition effects of concentrations of progesterone on embryo survival in the cow. Journal of Animal Science 82 (E.Suppl.) E24–E39CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macdonald, JR & Tuncer, E 2007 Deconvolution of immitance data: some old and new methods. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 602 255–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, GE & Lamming, GE 2001 Relationship between maternal endocrine environment, early embryo development and inhibition of the luteolytic mechanism in cows. Reproduction 121 175–180CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNeill, RE, Diskin, MG, Sreenan, JM & Morris, DG 2006 Association between milk progesterone concentrations on different days and with embryo survival during the early luteal phase in dairy cows. Theriogenology 65 1435–1441CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meier, S, Roche, JR, Kolver, ES, Verkerk, GA & Boston, RC 2009 Comparing sub-populations of plasma progesterone using cluster analysis. Journal of Dairy Science In pressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabiee, AR, Macmillan, KL & Schwarzenberger, F 2001 The effect of level of feed intake on progesterone clearance rate by measuring faecal progesterone metabolites in grazing dairy cows. Animal Reproduction Science 67 205–214CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reinecke, I & Deuflhard, P 2007 A Complex mathematical model of the human menstrual cycle. Journal of Theoretical Biology 247 303–330CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roche, JF, Austin, EJ, Ryan, M, O‘Rourke, M, Mihm, M & Diskin, MG 1999 Regulation of follicle waves to maximise fertility in cattle. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 54 (Suppl.) 61–71Google Scholar
Sangsritavong, S, Combs, DK, Sartori, R, Armentano, LE & Wiltbank, MC 2002 High feed intake increases liver blood flow and metabolism of progesterone and oestradiol-17beta in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 85 2831–2842CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stata 10 2007 StataCorp LP, College Station, Texas 77845, USAGoogle Scholar
Stefanovski, D, Moate, PJ & Boston, RC 2003 WinSAAM: a windows-based compartmental modeling system. Metabolism 52 1153–1166CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strong, AJ, Sreenan, JM, Diskin, MG, Mee, JF, Kenny, DA & Morris, DG 2005 Post-insemination milk progesterone concentrations and embryo survival in dairy cows. Theriogenology 64 1212–1224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townson, DH, Tsang, PCW, Butler, WR, Frajblat, M, Griel, LC Jr, Johnson, CJ, Milvae, RA, Niksic, GM & Pate, JL 2002 Relationship of fertility to ovarian follicular waves before breeding in dairy cows. Journal of Animal Science 80 1053–1058CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wagner, JG, Wilkinson, PK & Ganes, DA 1989 Parameters Vm and Km for elimination of alcohol in young males subjects following low doses of alcohol. Alcohol and Alcoholism 24 555–564CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wastney, ME, Patterson, BH, Linares, OH, Greif, PC & Boston, RC 1999 Investigating Biological Systems Using Modeling: Strategies and Software. New York, USA: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Wiltbank, M, Lopez, H, Sartori, R, Sangsritavong, S & Gumen, A 2006 Changes in reproductive physiology of lactating dairy cows due to elevated steroid metabolism. Theriogenology 65 17–29CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yenikoye, A, Mariana, JC, Ley, JP, Jolivet, E, Terqui, M & Lemon-Resplandy, M 1981 Mathematical model on the development of progesterone in the cow: application and proof of differences between breeds. Reproduction, Nutrition and Development 21 561–575CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed