Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-23T15:42:40.364Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Transnational Protection Regime and Taiwan's Democratization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2016

Su-Mei Ooi
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

On September 28, 1986, the Democratic Progressive Party was formed in defiance of restrictions set by a decades-old authoritarian regime, heralding the emergence of a fully competitive multiparty electoral system in Taiwan. Existing literature on Taiwan's democratic breakthrough suggests that international factors have played a significant role in bringing about democracy on the island. But what exactly were these external factors and how have they effected political change in Taiwan? A reexamination of the changing geopolitical and normative environments surrounding Taiwan suggests that they were crucial in shaping political development on the island in ways that have not been described in the literature. This article examines how the geopolitical and international normative environment enabled myriad external substate and nonstate actors to form a transnational “protection regime” around the political opposition, preserving the democratic movement and allowing it to reach its full mobilizational potential in time.

Keywords

Taiwandemocratizationhuman rightstransnational networksexternal pressurepolitical opposition
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of East Asian Studies , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , January 2009 , pp. 57 - 85
Copyright
Copyright © East Asia Institute 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burgerman, Susan. 2001. Moral Victories: How Activists Provoke Multilateral Action. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bush, Richard. 2004. At Cross Purposes: US-Taiwan Relations Since 1942. London: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Chao, Linda, and Myers, Ramon. 1998. The First Chinese Democracy: Political Life in the Republic of China on Taiwan. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Cheng, Tun-jen. 1989. “Democratizing the Quasi-Leninist Regime in Taiwan.” World Politics 41, 4: 471–499.Google Scholar
Cheng, Tun-jen, and Haggard, Stephan, eds. 1992. Political Change in Taiwan. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Ching, Frank. 1979. “Prosperous Pariah: A Most Envied Province.” Foreign Policy 36: 122–146.Google Scholar
Chu, Yun-han. 1992. Crafting Democracy in Taiwan. Taipei: Institute for National Policy Research.Google Scholar
Copper, John F. 1981. “Taiwan in 1980: Entering a New Decade.” Asian Survey 21, 1: 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, S. P. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Bruce J. 1973. “Taiwan 1972: Political Season.” Asian Survey 13, 1: 102–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keck, Margaret, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Khagram, Sanjeev, Riker, James, and Sikkink, Kathryn, eds. 2002. Restructuring World Politics: Transnational Social Movements, Networks, and Norms. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen, ed. 1983. International Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Wei-chin. 2000. “US Arms Transfer Policy to Taiwan: From Carter to Clinton.” Journal of Contemporary China 9, 23: 53–75.Google Scholar
Nathan, Andrew, and Ho, Helena. 1993. “Chiang Ching-kuo's Decision for Political Reform.” In Chiang Ching-kuo's Leadership in the Development of the Republic of China on Taiwan, ed. Leng, Shao-chuan, 31–62. Lanham, MD: American University Press.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, G., Schmitter, P., and Whitehead, L. 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Comparative Perspectives. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Ooi, Su-Mei. Forthcoming 2009. “The Transnational Protection Regime: An International Dimension of Democratic Development in Taiwan, South Korea and Singapore.” PhD diss., University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Peng, Ming-min. 1972. A Taste of Freedom. California: Taiwan Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Pye, Lucien. 1990. “Political Science and the Crisis of Authoritarianism.” American Political Science Review 84, 1: 3–19.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1999. The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, Denny. 2003. Taiwan: A Political History. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Samhat, Nayef H. 1999. “Human Rights Regimes and the Emergence of International Political Community.” International Politics 36: 503–527.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn. 1993. “Human Rights, Principled Issue Networks, and Sovereignty in Latin America.” International Organization 47, 3: 411–442.Google Scholar
Thomas, Daniel C. 2001. The Helsinki Effect: International Norms, Human Rights, and the Demise of Communism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tien, Hung-mao. 1989. The Great Transition: Political and Social Change in the Republic of China. Stanford: Hoover Institution Press.Google Scholar
Whitehead, Laurence, ed. 2001. The International Dimensions of Democratization: Europe and the Americas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wu, Joseph Jaushieh. 1995. Taiwan's Democratization: Forces Behind the New Momentum. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar