Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T06:46:31.400Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Comparative Analysis of Stock Price Behavior on the Bombay, London, and New York Stock Exchanges

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

Extract

The object of the present study was to test the random-walk model, by runs analysis and spectral densities, against representative stock market indexes of the Bombay, New York, and London Stock Exchanges. The three indexes examined were the Bombay Variable Dividend Industrial Share Index (BVDISI), consisting of 603 industrial stocks, the New York Standard and Poor's 425 Common Stock Index (S & P 425), and the London Financial Times-Actuaries 500 Stock Index (London F.T.-A.). The test period covered 132 monthly observations for each index for the 11-year period 1963–1973.

The general characteristics of the London F.T.-A. were found to be slightly different from the other two indexes studied. The first difference series the London F.T.-A. has higher mean and variance than BVDISI and S & P 425. However, the first differences of the log indexes did not show any significant differences. In this study, no effort was made to explain any inconsistencies between the London F.T.-A. and the other indexes, although previous studies [4, 12, 13, 20] have attributed such differences partly to institutional The behavior of the BVDISI is statistically indistinguishable from the London F.T.-A. and S & P 425 in terms of the tests of this paper. In runs analysis of consecutive price changes of the same sign, the study confirmed that the expected number of runs and observed number of runs are very close each other. For all the indexes, the actual and expected distribution of length turns out to be extremely similar, with probability equal to 0.5 rise or fall.

Further, the spectral densities, estimated for the first difference (raw and log transformed) of each index, confirmed the randomness of the and no systematic cyclical component or periodicity was present. Based tests, it is evident that stocks on the Bombay Stock Exchange obey a random walk and are equivalent in this sense to the behavior of stock prices in markets of advanced industrialized countries examined in this article.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Alexander, Sydney S. “Price Movements in Speculative Markets: Trends or Random Walk, No. 1.” Random Character of Stock Market Prices, edited by Cootner, Paul H.. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press (1964), pp. 199218.Google Scholar
[2]Alexander, Sydney S. “Price Movements in Speculative Markets: Trends or Random Walk, No. 2.” Random Character of Stock Market Prices, edited by Cootner, Paul. H.. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press (1964), pp. 338372.Google Scholar
[3]Box, George E. P., and Jenkins, Gwilym M., Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control. San Francisco: Holden Day (1970).Google Scholar
[4]Dryden, Miles M.Filter Tests of United Kingdom Share Prices.” Applied Economics, Vol. 7 (1970), pp. 265275.Google Scholar
[5]Fama, Eugene F.The Behavior of Stock Market Prices.” Journal of Business, Vol. 38 (January 1965), pp. 34105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Goldsmith, Raymond W. “Capital Markets and Economic Development.” International Symposium on Development of Capital Markets. Rio de Janeiro (September 1971).Google Scholar
[7]Granger, C. W. J., and Hatanaka, M.. Spectral Analysis of Economic Time Series. Princeton: Princeton University Press (1964).Google Scholar
[8]Granger, Clive W. J., and Morgenstern, Oskar. Predictability of Stock Market Prices. Lexington, Mass.: D. C. Heath and Company (1970).Google Scholar
[9]Gurley, John G. “Financial Structure in Developing Economies.” In Fiscal and Monetary Problems in Developing States: Proceedings of the Third Rehovoth Conference, ed by Krivine, David. New York (1967).Google Scholar
[10]Jenkins, G. M., and Watts, D. G.. Spectral Analysis and Its Applications. San Francisco: Holden Day (1968).Google Scholar
[11]Kendall, M. G.Analysis of Economic Time Series—Part I: Prices.” Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Vol. 16, Part I (1953), pp. 1125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Kendall, M. G.Time Series. New York: Hafner Press (1973).Google Scholar
[13]Little, Ian M. D., and Rayner, A. C.. Higgledy Piggledy Growth Again. Oxford: Basil Blackwell (1966).Google Scholar
[14]Mason, Robert Tempest. “The Creation of Risk Aversion by Imperfect Capital Markets.” American Economic Review, Vol. 62 (March 1972), pp. 7788.Google Scholar
[15]Moore, Arnold. “Some Characteristics of Changes in Common Stock Prices.” Kyklos, Vol. 16 (1963), pp. 127.Google Scholar
[16]Samuelson, Paul. “A Proof that Properly Anticipated Prices Fluctuate Randomly.” Industrial Management Review, Vol. 6 (Spring 1965), pp. 4149.Google Scholar
[17]Sharma, Jandhyala L. Theory of Random-Walk and Stock Price Behavior of Bombay Stock Exchange. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Arkansas (1976).Google Scholar
[18]Shaw, Edward S.Financial Deepening and Economic Development. New York: Oxford University Press (1973).Google Scholar
[19]Siegel, Sidney. Non-Parametric Statistics for Behavioral Sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company (1956).Google Scholar
[20]Taylor, Basil. “Investment: Art, Science or What?Lloyds Bank Review, Vol. 91 (January 1969), pp. 1021.Google Scholar
[21]Wai, W. Tun, and Patrick, Hugh. “Stocks and Bond Issues and Capital Markets in Less Developed Countries.” International Monetary Fund: Staff Papers, Vol. 20. Washington, D.C. (July 1973), pp. 253317.Google Scholar
[22]Working, Holbrook. “Note on the Correlation of First Differences of Averages in a Random Chain.” Econometrics, Vol. 28 (October–November 1960), pp. 916918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar