Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-31T16:07:55.126Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Industry Tournament Incentives and the Product-Market Benefits of Corporate Liquidity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 August 2018

Abstract

We evaluate the link between chief executive officer (CEO) industry tournament incentives (ITIs) and the product-market benefits of corporate liquidity. We find that ITIs increase the level and marginal value of cash holdings. Furthermore, ITIs strengthen the relation between excess cash and market-share gains, especially for firms that face significant competitive threats. Additionally, for firms with excess cash, higher ITIs lead to increased research and development (R&D) expenses, capital expenditures, and spending on focused acquisitions as well as reduced payouts. Overall, our findings suggest that ITIs increase the value of cash by incentivizing CEOs to deploy cash strategically to capture its product-market benefits.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

We thank Vikas Agarwal, Naveen Daniel, E. Han Kim, John McConnell, Gordon Phillips, Amiyatosh Purnanandam, and participants at the 2016 Krannert School of Management Conference to Celebrate John McConnell’s Contributions to Finance for helpful comments. This article was improved significantly because of the comments and suggestions we received from Jarrad Harford (the editor) and William Maxwell (the referee). We thank Ryan Williams and David Yin for their help with the construction of some of our incentive-related variables. The usual disclaimer applies.

References

Bates, T. W.; Chang, C. H.; and Lindsey, L.. “Analysts and Corporate Liquidity Policy.” Working Paper, Arizona State University (2012).Google Scholar
Bates, T. W.; Kahle, K. M.; and Stulz, R. M.. “Why Do U.S. Firms Hold So Much More Cash Than They Used To?Journal of Finance, 64 (2009), 19852021.Google Scholar
Benoit, J.Financially Constrained Entry in a Game with Incomplete Information.” Rand Journal of Economics, 15 (1984), 490499.Google Scholar
Berger, P. G.; Ofek, E.; and Swary, I.. “Investor Valuation of the Abandonment Option.” Journal of Financial Economics, 42 (1996), 257287.Google Scholar
Bertrand, M., and Mullainathan, S.. “Enjoying the Quiet Life? Corporate Governance and Managerial Preferences.” Journal of Political Economy, 111 (2003), 10431075.Google Scholar
Bizjak, J.; Lemmon, M.; and Nguyen, T.. “Are All CEOs above Average? An Empirical Analysis of Compensation Peer Groups and Pay Design.” Journal of Financial Economics, 100 (2011), 538555.Google Scholar
Bolton, P., and Scharfstein, D. S.. “A Theory of Predation Based on Agency Problems in Financial Contracting.” American Economic Review, 80 (1990), 93106.Google Scholar
Campello, M.Debt Financing: Does It Hurt or Boost Firm Performance in Product Markets?Journal of Financial Economics, 82 (2006), 135172.Google Scholar
Chen, J.; Hughson, E. N.; and Stoughton, N.. “Strategic Mutual Fund Tournaments.” Working Paper, University of California–Davis, Claremont Colleges, and WU Vienna University of Economics and Business (2017).Google Scholar
Coles, J. L.; Daniel, N. D.; and Naveen, L.. “Managerial Incentives and Risk-Taking.” Journal of Financial Economics, 79 (2006), 431468.Google Scholar
Coles, J. L.; Daniel, N. D.; and Naveen, L.. “Calculation of Compensation Incentives and Firm-Related Wealth Using ExecuComp: Data, Program, and Explanation.” Working Paper, University of Utah, Drexel University, and Temple University (2013).Google Scholar
Coles, J. L.; Daniel, N. D.; and Naveen, L.. “Co-Opted Boards.” Review of Financial Studies, 27 (2014), 17511796.Google Scholar
Coles, J. L.; Li, Z.; and Wang, Y.. “Industry Tournament Incentives.” Review of Financial Studies, 31 (2018), 14181459.Google Scholar
Dittmar, A., and Mahrt-Smith, J.. “Corporate Governance and the Value of Cash Holdings.” Journal of Financial Economics, 83 (2007), 599634.Google Scholar
Fama, E. F., and French, K. R.. “Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds.” Journal of Financial Economics, 33 (1993), 356.Google Scholar
Faulkender, M., and Wang, R.. “Corporate Financial Policy and the Value of Cash.” Journal of Finance, 61 (2006), 19571990.Google Scholar
Faulkender, M., and Yang, J.. “Inside the Black Box: The Role and Composition of Compensation Peer Groups.” Journal of Financial Economics, 96 (2010), 257270.Google Scholar
Fresard, L.Financial Strength and Product Market Behavior: The Real Effects of Corporate Cash Holdings.” Journal of Finance, 65 (2010), 10971122.Google Scholar
Gabaix, X., and Landier, A.. “Why Has CEO Pay Increased So Much?Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123 (2008), 49100.Google Scholar
Gao, H.; Harford, J.; and Li, K.. “Determinants of Corporate Cash Policy: Insights from Private Firms.” Journal of Financial Economics, 109 (2013), 623639.Google Scholar
Garmaise, M. J.Ties That Truly Bind: Non-Competition Agreements, Executive Compensation, and Firm Investment.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 27 (2011), 376425.Google Scholar
Goel, A. M., and Thakor, A. V.. “Overconfidence, CEO Selection, and Corporate Governance.” Journal of Finance, 63 (2008), 27372784.Google Scholar
Gompers, P.; Ishii, J.; and Metrick, A.. “Corporate Governance and Equity Prices.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118 (2003), 107155.Google Scholar
Gormley, T.; Matsa, D. A.; and Milbourn, T.. “CEO Compensation and Corporate Risk: Evidence from a Natural Experiment.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 56 (2013), 79101.Google Scholar
Harford, J.Corporate Cash Reserves and Acquisitions.” Journal of Finance, 54 (1999), 19691997.Google Scholar
Harford, J., and Li, K.. “Decoupling CEO Wealth and Firm Performance: The Case of Acquiring CEOs.” Journal of Finance, 62 (2007), 917949.Google Scholar
Harford, J.; Mansi, S.; and Maxwell, W.. “Corporate Governance and Firm Cash Holdings in the U.S.” Journal of Financial Economics, 87 (2008), 535555.Google Scholar
Haushalter, D.; Klasa, S.; and Maxwell, W.. “The Influence of Product Market Dynamics on a Firm’s Cash Holdings and Hedging Behavior.” Journal of Financial Economics, 84 (2007), 797825.Google Scholar
Hoberg, G.; Phillips, G.; and Prabhala, N.. “Product Market Threats, Payouts, and Financial Flexibility.” Journal of Finance, 69 (2014), 293324.Google Scholar
Hvide, H.Tournament Rewards and Risk Taking.” Journal of Labor Economics, 20 (2002), 877898.Google Scholar
Jeffers, J. S.“The Impact of Restricting Labor Mobility on Corporate Investment and Entrepreneurship.” Working Paper, University of Chicago (2017).Google Scholar
Jensen, M.Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers.” American Economic Review, 76 (1986), 323329.Google Scholar
Kale, J. R.; Reis, E.; and Venkateswaran, A.. “Rank-Order Tournaments and Incentive Alignment: The Effect on Firm Performance.” Journal of Finance, 64 (2009), 14791512.Google Scholar
Kini, O., and Williams, R.. “Tournament Incentives, Firm Risk, and Corporate Policies.” Journal of Financial Economics, 103 (2012), 350376.Google Scholar
Lazear, E. P., and Rosen, S.. “Rank-Order Tournaments as Optimum Labor Contracts.” Journal of Political Economy, 89 (1981), 841864.Google Scholar
Liu, Y., and Mauer, D. C.. “Corporate Cash Holdings and CEO Compensation Incentives.” Journal of Financial Economics, 102 (2011), 183198.Google Scholar
Liu, Y.; Mauer, D. C.; and Zhang, Y.. “Firm Cash Holdings and CEO Inside Debt.” Journal of Banking and Finance, 42 (2014), 83100.Google Scholar
Nalebuff, B. J., and Stiglitz, J. E.. “Prizes and Incentives: Towards a General Theory of Compensation and Competition.” Bell Journal of Economics, 14 (1983), 2143.Google Scholar
Opler, T.; Pinkowitz, L.; Stulz, R. M.; and Williamson, R.. “The Determinants and Implications of Corporate Cash Holdings.” Journal of Financial Economics, 52 (1999), 346.Google Scholar
Pinkowitz, L.; Sturgess, J.; and Williamson, R.. “Cash Stockpiles and Investment: Do Cash-Rich Firms Use Cash in Acquisitions?Journal of Corporate Finance, 23 (2013), 128149.Google Scholar
Prendergast, C.The Provision of Incentives in Firms.” Journal of Economic Literature, 37 (1999), 763.Google Scholar
Roberts, M. R., and Whited, T. M.. “Endogeneity in Empirical Corporate Finance.” In Handbook of the Economics of Finance, Constantinides, G., Stulz, R. M., and Harris, M., eds. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier (2013).Google Scholar
Wintoki, M. B.; Linck, J. S.; and Netter, J. M.. “Endogeneity and the Dynamics of Internal Corporate Governance.” Journal of Financial Economics, 105 (2012), 581606.Google Scholar
Zabojnik, J., and Bernhardt, D.. “Corporate Tournaments, Human Capital Acquisition, and Firm Size-Wage Relation.” Review of Economic Studies, 68 (2001), 693716.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Huang et al. supplementary material

Internet Appendix

Download Huang et al. supplementary material(File)
File 176.7 KB