Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-15T14:29:20.326Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Experimental study of the effect of particle–wall interactions on inertial particle dynamics in wall turbulence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2024

G.H. Wang
Affiliation:
Center for Particle-Laden Turbulence, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, PR China
W.B. Chen
Affiliation:
Center for Particle-Laden Turbulence, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, PR China
X.J. Zheng*
Affiliation:
Research Center for Applied Mechanics, Xidian University, Xi'an 710071, PR China
*
Email address for correspondence: xjzheng@lzu.edu.cn

Abstract

Based on Voronoi analysis, the properties related to the near-wall motion of particles in a turbulent boundary layer were experimentally investigated via different release modes, with a friction Reynolds number $Re_\tau =3530$. For high-inertia sand particles with Stokes number $St^+ \sim O(10^2\unicode{x2013}10^3)$ and a volume fraction $\varPhi _v \sim O(10^{-4})$, particle image tracking velocimetry was used to determine the particle position and near-wall distribution properties. We established three particle release modes, including top-released, bottom overall-released and bottom partially released sand particles, under the same flow field conditions and calculated the differences in particle near-wall clustering and void properties. It was confirmed that wall effects (including collision and strike-splash) have a great influence on particle clustering and void behaviour near the wall. In the top-released sand particle and locally laid sand particle cases, particles bounced off the smooth walls and re-entered the carrier flow, causing significant clustering and sparsing of particles near the walls. In contrast, in the overall sand-laying case where the bottom wall was completely covered with sand particles, there is no apparent cluster or void phenomenon near the wall $(z/\delta <0.12)$ and the particles are randomly distributed, due to the combined effect of particle impact and splashing. In addition, the clustering and voids of particles become more pronounced with increasing wall-normal distance in the three release modes, and the particle distribution shows some self-similarity at each flow layer. The probability density function of the concentration of cluster particles decreases following a ‘$-5/3$’ power law. However, due to the particle–wall interaction, the probability density function gradually deviates from the ‘$-5/3$’ power law.

Type
JFM Papers
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aliseda, A., Cartellier, A., Hainaux, F. & Lasheras, J.C. 2002 Effect of preferential concentration on the settling velocity of heavy particles in homogeneous isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 468, 77105.Google Scholar
Baas, A.C.W. & Sherman, D.J. 2005 Formation and behavior of aeolian streamers. J. Geophys. Res.: Earth Surf. 110, F3.Google Scholar
Baker, L., Frankel, A., Mani, A. & Coletti, F. 2017 Coherent clusters of inertial particles in homogeneous turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 833, 364398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balachandar, S. & Eaton, J.K. 2010 Turbulent dispersed multiphase flow. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 42, 111133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bragg, A.D. & Collins, L.R. 2014 New insights from comparing statistical theories for inertial particles inturbulence: I. Spatial distribution of particles. Phys. Rev. Fluids 16 (5), 055013.Google Scholar
Bragg, A.D., Ireland, P.J. & Collins, L.R. 2015 Mechanisms for the clustering of inertial particles in the vinertial range of isotropic turbulence. Phys. Rev. E 92 (2), 023029.Google Scholar
Brandt, L. & Coletti, F. 2022 Particle-laden turbulence: progress and perspectives. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 54, 159189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chauhan, K.A., Monkewitz, P.A. & Nagib, H.M. 2009 Criteria for assessing experiments in zero pressure gradient boundary layers. Fluid Dyn. Res. 41 (2), 021404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, L., Goto, S. & Vassilicos, J.C. 2006 Turbulent clustering of stagnation points and inertial particles. J. Fluid Mech. 553, 143154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, S.W. & Vassilicos, J.C. 2009 A unified sweep-stick mechanism to explain particle clustering in two- and three-dimensional homogeneous, isotropic turbulence. Phys. Fluids 21 (11), 113301.Google Scholar
Dejoan, A. & Monchaux, R. 2013 Preferential concentration and settling of heavy particles in homogeneous turbulence. Phys. Fluids 25 (1), 013301.Google Scholar
Eaton, J.K. & Fessler, J. 1994 Preferential concentration of particles by turbulence. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 20, 169209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, J.T., Li, B., Farrell, E.J. & Sherman, D.J. 2009 Protocols for characterizing aeolian mass-flux profiles. Aeolian Res. 1 (1–2), 1926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falkinhoff, F., Obligado, M. & Bourgoin, P.M. 2014 Preferential concentration of free-falling heavy particles in turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (16), 064504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferenc, J.S. & Néda, Z. 2007 On the size distribution of Poisson Voronoi cells. Phys. A: Stat. Mech. Appl. 385 (2), 518526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fessler, J.R., Kulick, J.D. & Eaton, J.K. 1994 Preferential concentration of heavy particles in a turbulent channel flow. Phys. Fluids A 6 (11), 37423749.Google Scholar
Fong, K.O., Amili, O. & Coletti, F. 2019 Velocity and spatial distribution of inertial particles in a turbulent channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 872, 367406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goto, S. & Vassilicos, J.C. 2006 Self-similar clustering of inertial particles and zero-acceleration points in fully developed two-dimensional turbulence. Phys. Fluids 18 (11), 115103.Google Scholar
Gustavsson, K. & Mehlig, B. 2011 a Ergodic and non-ergodic clustering of inertial particles. Eur. Phys. Lett. 96, 60012.Google Scholar
Gustavsson, K. & Mehlig, B. 2011 b Statistical models for spatial patterns of heavy particles in turbulence. Adv. Phys. 65 (1), 157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konan, N.A., Kannengieser, O. & Simonin, O. 2009 Stochastic modeling of the multiple rebound effects for particle-rough wall collisions. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 35 (10), 933945.Google Scholar
Li, Y., McLaughlin, J.B., Kontomaris, K. & Portela, L. 2001 Numerical simulation of particle-laden turbulent channel flow. Phys. Fluids 13 (10), 29572967.Google Scholar
Liu, H., Feng, Y. & Zheng, X. 2022 Experimental investigation of the effects of particle near-wall motions on turbulence statistics in particle-laden flows. J. Fluid Mech. 943, A8.Google Scholar
Marchioli, C. 2017 Physics and modelling of particle deposition and resuspension in wall-bounded turbulence. In Particles in Wall-Bounded Turbulent Flows: Deposition, Re-suspension and Agglomeration (ed. J.P. Minier & J. Pozorski), CISM International Centre for Mechanical Sciences, vol. 571, pp. 151–208. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchioli, C. & Soldati, A. 2002 Mechanisms for particle transfer and segregation in a turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 468, 283315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marusic, I. & Kunkel, G.J. 2003 Streamwise turbulence intensity formulation for flat-plate boundary layers. Phys. Fluids 15 (8), 24612464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxey, M.R. 1987 The gravitational settling of aerosol particles in homogeneous turbulence and random flow fields. J. Fluid Mech. 174, 441465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxey, M.R. 1993 Settling velocity and concentration distribution of heavy particles in homogeneous isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 256, 2768.Google Scholar
Momenifar, M. & Bragg, A.D. 2020 Local analysis of the clustering, velocities, and accelerations of particles settling in turbulence. Adv. Phys. 5, 034306.Google Scholar
Monchaux, R., Bourgoin, M. & Cartellier, A. 2010 Preferential concentration of heavy particles: a Voronoï analysis. Phys. Fluids 22 (10), 103304.Google Scholar
Monchaux, R., Bourgoin, M. & Cartellier, A. 2012 Analyzing preferential concentration and clustering of inertial particles in turbulence. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 40, 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muthanna, C., Nieuwstadt, F.T.M. & Hunt, J.C.R. 2005 Measurement of the aerodynamic forces on a small particle attached to a wall. Exp. Fluids 39, 455463.Google Scholar
Obligado, M., Cartellier, A. & Bourgoin, M. 2014 Experimental detection of superclusters of water droplets in homogeneous isotropic turbulence. Europhys. Lett. 112 (5), 54004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obligado, M., Teitelbaum, T., Cartellier, A., Mininni, P. & Bourgoin, M. 2014 Preferential concentration of heavy particles in turbulence. J. Turbul. 15 (5), 293310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, A.J., Baker, L. & Coletti, F. 2019 Experimental study of inertial particles clustering and settling in homogeneous turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 864, 925970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasmussen, K.R. & Sørensen, M. 2008 Vertical variation of particle speed and flux density in aeolian saltation: measurement and modeling. J. Geophys. Res.: Earth Surf. 113 (F2), F02S12.Google Scholar
Reeks, M.W. 1983 Mechanisms for particle transfer and segregation in a turbulent boundary layer. Aerosol Sci. 14 (6), 729739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saw, E.W., Bewley, G.P., Bodenschatz, E., Sankar Ray, S. & Bec, J. 2014 Extreme fluctuations of the relative velocities between droplets in turbulent airflow. Phys. Fluids 26 (11), 111702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sciacchitano, A., Wieneke, B. & Scarano, F. 2013 PIV uncertainty quantification by image matching. Meas. Sci. Technol. 24 (4), 045302.Google Scholar
Sommerfeld, M. 2003 Analysis of collision effects for turbulent gas-particle flow in a horizontal channel: part I. Particle transport. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 29 (4), 675699.Google Scholar
Squires, K.D. & Eaton, J.K. 1990 Particle response and turbulence modification in isotropic turbulence. Phys. Fluids A: Fluid Dyn. 2 (7), 11911203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumbekova, S., Cartellier, A., Aliseda, A. & Bourgoin, M. 2017 Preferential concentration of inertial sub-Kolmogorov particles: the roles of mass loading of particles, Stokes numbers, and Reynolds numbers. Phys. Rev. Fluids 2 (2), 024302.Google Scholar
Tagawa, Y., Mercado, J.M., Prakash, V.N., Calzavarini, E., Sun, C. & Lohse, D. 2012 Three-dimensional Lagrangian Voronoï analysis for clustering of particles and bubbles in turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 693, 201215.Google Scholar
Wang, L.P. & Maxey, M.R. 1993 Settling velocity and concentration distribution of heavy particles in homogeneous isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 256, 2768.Google Scholar
Wang, P., Feng, S., Zheng, X. & Sung, H.J. 2019 The scale characteristics and formation mechanism of aeolian sand streamers based on large eddy simulation. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 124 (21), 1137211388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y. & Lam, K.M. 2020 Clustering behaviour and settling velocity of bidisperse inertial particles in turbulent open channel flow. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 129, 103303.Google Scholar
Zamansky, R., Coletti, F., Massot, M. & Mani, A. 2016 Turbulent thermal convection driven by heated inertial particles. J. Fluid Mech. 809, 390437.Google Scholar
Zeng, L. 2007 Interaction between a spherical particle and wall-bounded flows at finite Reynolds number. PhD thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Zheng, X., Wang, G. & Zhu, W. 2021 Experimental study on the effects of particle-wall interactions on VLSM in sand-laden flows. J. Fluid Mech. 914, A35.Google Scholar
Zhu, H., Pan, C., Wang, G., Liang, Y., Ji, X. & Wang, J. 2021 Attached eddy-like particle clustering in a turbulent boundary layer under net sedimentation conditions. J. Fluid Mech. 920, A53.Google Scholar