Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T06:26:57.265Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Integral methods for friction decomposition and their extensions to rough-wall flows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2024

Wen Zhang
Affiliation:
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Turbulence Research and Applications, Department of Mechanics and Aerospace Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, PR China Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Joint Laboratory for Data-Driven Fluid Mechanics and Engineering Applications, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, PR China
Xiang I.A. Yang*
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, PA 16802, USA
Peng Chen
Affiliation:
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Turbulence Research and Applications, Department of Mechanics and Aerospace Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, PR China Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Joint Laboratory for Data-Driven Fluid Mechanics and Engineering Applications, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, PR China
Minping Wan*
Affiliation:
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Turbulence Research and Applications, Department of Mechanics and Aerospace Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, PR China Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Joint Laboratory for Data-Driven Fluid Mechanics and Engineering Applications, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, PR China
*
Email addresses for correspondence: xzy48@psu.edu, wanmp@sustech.edu.cn
Email addresses for correspondence: xzy48@psu.edu, wanmp@sustech.edu.cn

Abstract

A primary objective of integral methods, such as the momentum integral method, is to discern the physical processes contributing to skin friction. These methods encompass the momentum, kinetic energy and angular momentum integrals. This paper reformulates existing integrals based on the double-averaged Navier–Stokes equations, and extends their application to flows over rough walls. Our derivation yields distinct decompositions for the bottom-wall viscous friction coefficient, denoted as $C_S$, and the roughness element drag coefficient $C_R$. The decompositions comprise three terms: a viscous term, a turbulent term and a roughness (dispersive) term – regardless of the flow configuration, be it channel or boundary layer. Notably, when these integrals are evaluated for laminar flow scenarios, only the viscous term remains significant. In addition, we elucidate the spatial distributions of the terms within these decompositions. To demonstrate the practicality of our formulations, we apply them to analyse data from direct numerical simulations of turbulent half-channel flows. These flows feature aligned and staggered cubical roughness at various packing densities. Our analyses, based on kinetic-energy-oriented decompositions, reveal that when the surface coverage density $\lambda _p$ is small, the dominant terms within the decompositions are the viscous and turbulent terms. With increasing $\lambda _p$, the viscous dissipation term decreases, while the turbulent production term increases and then decreases. These variations arise from a subdued near-wall cycle and the development of a shear layer at the height of the cubes.

Type
JFM Papers
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aghaei-Jouybari, M., Seo, J.-H., Yuan, J., Mittal, R. & Meneveau, C. 2022 Contributions to pressure drag in rough-wall turbulent flows: insights from force partitioning. Phys. Rev. Fluids 7 (8), 084602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, W., Barros, J.M., Christensen, K.T. & Awasthi, A. 2015 Numerical and experimental study of mechanisms responsible for turbulent secondary flows in boundary layer flows over spanwise heterogeneous roughness. J. Fluid Mech. 768, 316347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bannier, A., Garnier, E. & Sagaut, P. 2015 Riblet flow model based on an extended FIK identity. Flow Turbul. Combust. 95, 351376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, P.E.S., Zhu, X., Shi, Y. & Yang, X.I.A. 2023 Quantifying uncertainties in direct-numerical-simulation statistics due to wall-normal numerics and grids. Phys. Rev. Fluids 8, 074602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, H., Hayden, P., Robins, A. & Castro, I. 2007 Flow over cube arrays of different packing densities. J. Wind Engng Ind. Aerodyn. 95 (8), 715740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, W.-C. & Porté-Agel, F. 2015 Adjustment of turbulent boundary-layer flow to idealized urban surfaces: a large-eddy simulation study. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 155 (2), 249270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chester, S., Meneveau, C. & Parlange, M.B. 2007 Modeling turbulent flow over fractal trees with renormalized numerical simulation. J. Comput. Phys. 225, 427448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chung, D., Hutchins, N., Schultz, M.P. & Flack, K.A. 2021 Predicting the drag of rough surfaces. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 53, 439471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deck, S., Renard, N., Laraufie, R. & Weiss, P.-E. 2014 Large-scale contribution to mean wall shear stress in high-Reynolds-number flat-plate boundary layers up to $Re_{{\theta }}=13\,650$. J. Fluid Mech. 743, 202248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elnahhas, A. & Johnson, P.L. 2022 On the enhancement of boundary layer skin friction by turbulence: an angular momentum approach. J. Fluid Mech. 940, A36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fan, Y., Li, W., Atzori, M., Pozuelo, R., Schlatter, P. & Vinuesa, R. 2020 Decomposition of the mean friction drag in adverse-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layers. Phys. Rev. Fluids 5, 114608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flack, K.A. & Schultz, M.P. 2010 Review of hydraulic roughness scales in the fully rough regime. J. Fluids Engng 132 (4), 041203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukagata, K., Iwamoto, K. & Hasegawa, Y. 2024 Turbulent drag reduction by streamwise traveling waves of wall-normal forcing. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 56, 4566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukagata, K., Iwamoto, K. & Kasagi, N. 2002 Contribution of Reynolds stress distribution to the skin friction in wall-bounded flows. Phys. Fluids 14 (11), L73L76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, A.-K. & Wu, J. 2019 A note on the Galilean invariance of aerodynamic force theories in unsteady incompressible flows. Acta Mechanica Sin. 35, 11501154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giometto, M.G., Christen, A., Meneveau, C., Fang, J., Krafczyk, M. & Parlange, M.B. 2016 Spatial characteristics of roughness sublayer mean flow and turbulence over a realistic urban surface. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 160 (3), 425452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Giovanetti, M., Hwang, Y. & Choi, H. 2016 Skin-friction generation by attached eddies in turbulent channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 808, 511538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez, T., Flutet, V. & Sagaut, P. 2009 Contribution of Reynolds stress distribution to the skin friction in compressible turbulent channel flows. Phys. Rev. E 79, 035301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, J. & Meneveau, C. 2012 Modeling turbulent flow over fractal trees using renormalized numerical simulation: alternate formulations and numerical experiments. Phys. Fluids 24 (12), 125105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagishima, A., Tanimoto, J., Nagayama, K. & Meno, S. 2009 Aerodynamic parameters of regular arrays of rectangular blocks with various geometries. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 132 (2), 315337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iwamoto, K., Fukagata, K., Kasagi, N. & Suzuki, Y. 2005 Friction drag reduction achievable by near-wall turbulence manipulation at high Reynolds numbers. Phys. Fluids 17 (1), 011702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiménez, J. 2004 Turbulent flows over rough walls. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 36, 173196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J., Moin, P. & Moser, R. 1987 Turbulence statistics in fully developed channel flow at low Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 177, 133166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J.H., Sung, H.J. & Krogstad, P.-Å. 2011 Direct numerical simulation of the turbulent boundary layer over a cube-roughened wall. J. Fluid Mech. 669, 397431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonardi, S. & Castro, I.P. 2010 Channel flow over large cube roughness: a direct numerical simulation study. J. Fluid Mech. 651, 519539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, W., Fan, Y., Modesti, D. & Cheng, C. 2019 Decomposition of the mean skin-friction drag in compressible turbulent channel flows. J. Fluid Mech. 875, 101123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lozano-Durán, A. & Jiménez, J. 2014 Effect of the computational domain on direct simulations of turbulent channels up to $Re_\tau = 4200$. Phys. Fluids 26 (1), 011702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marusic, I., Mathis, R. & Hutchins, N. 2010 High Reynolds number effects in wall turbulence. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 31 (3), 418428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marusic, I. & Monty, J.P. 2019 Attached eddy model of wall turbulence. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 51, 4974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marxen, O. & Zaki, T.A. 2019 Turbulence in intermittent transitional boundary layers and in turbulence spots. J. Fluid Mech. 860, 350383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehdi, F., Johansson, T.G., White, C.M. & Naughton, J.W. 2014 On determining wall shear stress in spatially developing two-dimensional wall-bounded flows. Exp. Fluids 55, 1656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nikora, V., Ballio, F., Coleman, S. & Pokrajac, D. 2013 Spatially averaged flows over mobile rough beds: definitions, averaging theorems, and conservation equations. ASCE J. Hydraul. Engng 139 (8), 803811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nikora, V.I., Stoesser, T., Cameron, S.M., Stewart, M., Papadopoulos, K., Ouro, P., McSherry, R., Zampiron, A., Marusic, I. & Falconer, R.A. 2019 Friction factor decomposition for rough-wall flows: theoretical background and application to open-channel flows. J. Fluid Mech. 872, 626664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Passiatore, D., Sciacovelli, L., Cinnella, P. & Pascazio, G. 2021 Finite-rate chemistry effects in turbulent hypersonic boundary layers: a direct numerical simulation study. Phys. Rev. Fluids 6, 054604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raupach, M.R. 1992 Drag and drag partition on rough surfaces. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 60 (1852), 375395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raupach, M.R., Finnigan, J.J. & Brunet, Y. 1996 Coherent eddies and turbulence in vegetation canopies: the mixing-layer analogy. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 25, 351382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raupach, M.R. & Shaw, R.H. 1982 Averaging procedures for flow within vegetation canopies. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 22, 7990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renard, N. & Deck, S. 2016 A theoretical decomposition of mean skin friction generation into physical phenomena across the boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 790, 339367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricco, P. & Skote, M. 2022 Integral relations for the skin-friction coefficient of canonical flows. J. Fluid Mech. 943, A50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlichting, H. & Gersten, K. 2017 Boundary Layer Theory, 9th edn. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, A. & Garcia-Mayoral, R. 2020 Scaling and dynamics of turbulence over sparse canopies. J. Fluid Mech. 888, A1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smits, A.J., McKeon, B.J. & Marusic, I. 2011 High-Reynolds number wall turbulence. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 43 (1), 353375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volino, R.J. & Schultz, M.P. 2018 Determination of wall shear stress from mean velocity and Reynolds shear stress profiles. Phys. Rev. Fluids 3, 034606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenzel, C., Gibis, T. & Kloker, M. 2022 About the influences of compressibility, heat transfer and pressure gradients in compressible turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 930, A1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xia, Z., Zhang, P. & Yang, X.I.A. 2021 On skin friction in wall-bounded turbulence. Acta Mechanica Sin. 37, 589598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, D., Wang, J. & Chen, S. 2022 Skin-friction and heat-transfer decompositions in hypersonic transitional and turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 941, A4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, H.H.A., Altland, S.J., Yang, X.I.A. & Kunz, R.F. 2021 Flow over closely packed cubical roughness. J. Fluid Mech. 920, A37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, X. & Howland, M. 2018 Implication of Taylor's hypothesis on measuring flow modulation. J. Fluid Mech. 836, 222237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, X.I.A. & Griffin, K.P. 2021 Grid-point and time-step requirements for direct numerical simulation and large-eddy simulation. Phys. Fluids 33 (1), 015108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, X.I.A., Sadique, J., Mittal, R. & Meneveau, C. 2016 Exponential roughness layer and analytical model for turbulent boundary layer flow over rectangular-prism roughness elements. J. Fluid Mech. 789, 127165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, X.I.A., Xu, H.H.A., Huang, X.L.D. & Ge, M.-W. 2019 Drag forces on sparsely packed cube arrays. J. Fluid Mech. 880, 9921019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoon, M., Ahn, J., Hwang, J. & Sung, H.J. 2016 Contribution of velocity–vorticity correlations to the frictional drag in wall-bounded turbulent flows. Phys. Fluids 28 (8), 081702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, W., Wan, M., Xia, Z., Wang, J., Lu, X. & Chen, S. 2021 Constrained large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow over rough walls. Phys. Rev. Fluids 6, 044602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, W., Yang, X.I.A., Zhu, X., Wan, M. & Chen, S. 2023 Asymmetric secondary flows above geometrically symmetric surface roughness. J. Fluid Mech. 970, A15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, W., Zhu, X., Yang, X.I.A. & Wan, M. 2022 Evidence for Raupach et al.'s mixing-layer analogy in deep homogeneous urban-canopy flows. J. Fluid Mech. 944, A46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, X. & Anderson, W. 2018 Turbulent flow over urban-like fractals: prognostic roughness model for unresolved generations. J. Turbul. 19 (11–12), 9951016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar