Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-12T19:47:37.323Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Trajectory and flow properties for a rod spinning in a viscous fluid. Part 1. An exact solution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2008

ROBERTO CAMASSA
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3250, USA
TERRY JO LEITERMAN
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, St Norbert College, DePere, WI 54115-2099, USA
RICHARD M. MCLAUGHLIN
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3250, USA

Abstract

An exact mathematical solution for the low-Reynolds-number quasi-steady hydrodynamic motion induced by a rod in the form of a prolate spheroid sweeping a symmetric double cone is developed, and the influence of the ensuing fluid motion upon passive particles is studied. The resulting fluid motion is fully three-dimensional and time varying. The advected particles are observed to admit slow orbits around the rotating rods and a fast epicyclic motion roughly commensurate with the rod rotation rate. The epicycle amplitudes, vertical fluctuations, arclengths and angle travelled per rotation are mapped as functions of their initial coordinates and rod geometry. These trajectories exhibit a rich spatial structure with greatly varying trajectory properties. Laboratory frame asymmetries of these properties are explored using integer time Poincaré sections and far-field asymptotic analysis. This includes finding a small cone angle invariant in the limit of large spherical radius whereas an invariant for arbitrary cone angles is obtained in the limit of large cylindrical radius. The Eulerian and Lagrangian flow properties of the fluid flow are studied and shown to exhibit complex structures in both space and time. In particular, spatial regions of high speed and Lagrangian velocities possessing multiple extrema per rod rotation are observed. We establish the origin of these complexities via an auxiliary flow in a rotating frame, which provides a generator that defines the epicycles. Finally, an additional spin around the major spheroidal axis is included in the exact hydrodynamic solution resulting in enhanced vertical spatial fluctuation as compared to the spinless counterpart. The connection and relevance of these observations with recent developments in nano-scale fluidics is discussed, where similar epicycle behaviour has been observed. The present study is of direct use to nano-scale actuated fluidics.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Afzelius, B. A. 1976 A human syndrome caused by immotile cilia. Science 193, 317319.Google Scholar
Bajer, K. & Moffat, H. K. 1990 On a class of steady confined Stokes flows with chaotic streamlines. J. Fluid Mech. 212, 337363.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. 1970 Slender-body theory for particle of arbitrary cross-section in Stokes flow. J. Fluid Mech. 44, 419440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, J. R. 1971 A note on the image system for a Stokeslet in a no slip boundary. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 70, 303310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, S. 1991 Laser manipulation of atoms and particles. Science 253, 861866.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chwang, A. T. & Wu, T. Y. 1975 Hydrodynamics of low-Renolds-number flow. Part 2. Singularity method for Stokes flow. J. Fluid Mech. 67, 787815.Google Scholar
Edwardes, D. 1892 Steady motion of a viscous liquid in which an ellipsoid is constrained to rotate about a principal axis. Q. J. Maths 26, 7078.Google Scholar
Fisher, J. K., Cribb, J., Desai, K. V., Vicci, L., Wilde, B., Keller, K., Taylor, R. M., Haase, J., Bloom, K., O'Brien, E. T. & Superfine, R. 2006 Thin-foil magnetic force system for high-numerical-aperature microscopy. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 27, 2.Google Scholar
Fulford, G. R. & Blake, J. R. 1986 Muco-ciliary transport in the lung. J. Theor. Biol. 121, 381402.Google Scholar
Goldstein, H. 1950 Classical Mechanics. Addison–Wesley.Google Scholar
Hancock, G. J. 1953 The self-propulsion of microscopic organisms through liquids. Proc. R. Soc. A 217, 96121.Google Scholar
Hirokawa, N. 2000 Stirring up development with the heterotrimeric kinesin KIF3. Traffic 1, 2934.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jing, H. 2006 Manipulating nano-scale devices: a new tunable assembly method for nano-scale fluid dynamics. PhD thesis. University of North Carolina.Google Scholar
Kartagener, M. 1933 Zur Pathogenese der Bronchiektasien. I. Mitteilung Bronchiektasien bei Situs viscerum inversus. Beitr. Klin. Tuberk. 83, 498501.Google Scholar
Kim, S. 1986 Singularity solutions for ellipsoids in low-Reynolds-number flows: with applications to the calculation of hydrodynamic interactions in suspensions of ellipsoids. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 12, 469491.Google Scholar
Kroujiline, D. & Stone, H. A. 1999 Chaotic streamlines in steady bounded three-dimensional Stokes flows. Physica D 130, 105132.Google Scholar
Leiterman, T. J. 2006 Exact and asymptotic low Reynolds, time-varying solutions for spinning rods and a comparison to experiments on the micro and macroscale. PhD thesis. University of North Carolina.Google Scholar
Matsui, H., Randell, S. H., Peretti, S. W., Davis, C. W. & Boucher, R. C. 1998 Coordinate clearance of periciliary liquid and mucin from airway surfaces. J. Clin. Invest. 102, 11251131.Google Scholar
Nonaka, S., Shiratori, H., Saijoh, Y. & Hamada, H. 2002 Singularity solutions for ellipsoids in low-Reynolds-number flows: with applications to the calculation of hydrodynamic interactions in suspensions of ellipsoids. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 12, 469491.Google Scholar
Perkins, T. T., Smith, D. E. & Chu, S. 1999 Single-polymer dynamics in steady shear flow. Science 283, 17241727.Google Scholar
Pozrikidis, C. 1997 Introduction to Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sanders, J. A. & Verhulst, F. 1985 Averaging Methods in Nonlinear Dynamical Systems. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sleigh, M. A., Blake, J. R. & Liron, N. 1988 The propulsion of mucus by cilia. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 137, 726741.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, D. E., Babcock, H. P. & Chu, S. 1997 Single-polymer dynamics in an elongational flow. Science 276, 20162021.Google Scholar
Stone, H. A., Nadim, A. & Strogatz, S. H. 1991 Chaotic streamlines inside drops immersed in steady Stokes flows. J. Fluid Mech. 232, 629646.Google Scholar
Sulik, K., Dehart, D. B., Iangaki, T., Carson, J. L, Vrablic, T., Gesteland, K. & Schoenwolf, G. C. 1994 Morphogenesis of the murine node and notochordal plate. Dev. Dyn. 201, 260278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, G. I. 1969 Motion of axisymmetric bodies in viscous fluids. In Problems of Hydrodynamics and Continuum Mechanics pp. 718724. SIAM.Google Scholar
Wu, T. Y. 1978 Slender-body theory for low-Reynolds-number flows. In Symposium on Applied Mathematics, dedicated to the late Prof.Dr.Timman, R. (ed. Hermans, A. J. & Oosterweld, M. W. C.) pp. 191–202. Delft University Press.Google Scholar