Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T13:45:57.336Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Formation of air clathrate hydrates in polar ice sheets: heterogeneous nucleation induced by micro-inclusions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2017

Hiroshi Ohno ,
Vladimir Ya. Lipenkov  and
Takeo Hondoh
Hiroshi Ohno
Affiliation:
Institute of Low Temperature Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0819, Japan E-mail: hiroshi-ohno@aist.go.jp
Vladimir Ya. Lipenkov
Affiliation:
Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute, 199397 St Petersburg, Russia
Takeo Hondoh
Affiliation:
Institute of Low Temperature Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0819, Japan E-mail: hiroshi-ohno@aist.go.jp
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

To investigate factors influencing nucleation of air clathrate hydrates in polar ice sheets, we have performed high-resolution mapping of the distributions of soluble impurities, air bubbles and air- hydrate crystals versus depth in the Dome Fuji Antarctic ice. Significant correlation observed between the concentrations of air inclusions and impurities in ice along with frequent occurrence of impurities inside hydrate crystals suggest that micro-inclusions promote hydrate nucleation in the ice matrix. Our observations also show that the diffusive macroscopic-scale redistribution of air constituents in ice in the bubble-hydrate transition zone is controlled by the original sedimentary layering of soluble impurities acting as nucleation helpers. The results of this study are important for the correct interpretation of high-resolution gas analyses of ice cores and for better understanding the global bubble-to-hydrate transformation process in polar ice sheets.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Glaciology , Volume 56 , Issue 199 , 2010 , pp. 917 - 921
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 2010

1. Introduction

Air bubbles and air hydrates (hereafter air inclusions) in polar ice cores attract considerable interest as important proxies for past climate changes: their air provides the most direct record of past atmospheric gas compositions (e.g. Reference KawamuraKawamura and others, 2007; Reference LuthiLuthi and others, 2008), and their mean size and number concentration exhibit significant variations depending on the temperature and accumulation rate prevailing during the snow-ice transformation (Reference Barkov and LipenkovBarkov and Lipenkov, 1984;Reference Uchida, Hondoh, Mae, Lipenkov and DuvalUchida and others, 1994a;Reference NaritaNarita and others, 1999;Reference Pauer, Kipfstuhl, Kuhs and ShojiPauer and others, 1999;Reference Lipenkov and HondohLipenkov, 2000).

Understanding the mechanism of air-bubble to clathrate- hydrate transformation in ice sheets is essential for proper interpretation of ice-core records, because the processes of air clathration can alter the climate signals. Although considerable knowledge of post-nucleation hydrate growth has been accumulated through previous experimental (Reference Uchida, Hondoh, Mae, Duval, Lipenkov, Maeno and HondohUchida and others, 1992, 1994b) and theoretical work (Reference Salamatin, Hondoh, Uchida and LipenkovSalamatin and others, 1998, 2003), little is known about hydrate nucleation phenomena. Since there are abundant hydrate guest molecules in air bubbles, it is generally thought that air hydrate will always nucleate at a bubble-ice interface (Reference Hondoh and UchidaHondoh and Uchida, 1992). In contrast to this common view, we have previously suggested that a significant number of hydrate crystals may nucleate heterogeneously in the ice matrix away from air bubbles (Reference Ohno, Lipenkov and HondohOhno and others, 2004). In the present study, we analyze the spatial distributions of both types of air inclusions and impurities in the Dome Fuji Antarctic ice core to provide new evidence that heterogeneous nucleation is induced by the presence of micro-inclusions.

2. Method and Results

We have mapped the spatial distributions of air inclusions and impurities in two 17cm long ice cores from depths of 999.34-999.51 and 999.57-999.74 m, i.e. from near the middle of the bubble-to-hydrate transition zone. The bubble-to-hydrate transition in the Dome Fuji ice core occurs at ˜500-1200m depth (Reference NaritaNarita and others, 1999), corresponding to ˜18.3-76.8 ka bp, the last glacial period (Reference Hondoh, Shoji, Watanabe, Salamatin and LipenkovHondoh and others, 2002). The number concentrations of air- and micro-inclusions in the ice cores were measured continuously with an optical microscope along the core axis in every 1 cm thick layer. To obtain the average number concentrations of air bubbles, N b, clathrate hydrates, N h, and micro-inclusions, N m, in an ice layer, we randomly selected 20 cells of dimension 1.8 × 1.4 × 5 mm3 for air inclusions, and 20 regions of 0.18 × 0.14 × 5 mm3 for micro-inclusions. We then counted the number of inclusions in each cell. The standard errors of N b, N h and N m were about 9%, 12% and 17%, respectively. For the same samples, soluble ion content was measured using ion chromatography. Detailed information on the soluble-ion analysis is presented by Reference Igarashi, Kanamori and WatanabeIgarashi and others (1998). In addition, using the same experimental technique as above, we obtained the average number concentrations of inclusions and determined the location of micro-inclusions with respect to hydrate crystals in three vertical ice sections (8 × 5 × 0.5 cm3) from depths of 595, 751 and 999 m. In these ice sections we also measured the size of 100 clathrate hydrates and counted the number of microinclusions within the hydrates. For the hydrate volume estimation, either a spherical or a cylindrical visual approximation of the inclusion (depending on its shape) was used (Reference Lipenkov and HondohLipenkov, 2000). Detailed information on the Dome Fuji ice core has been published by the Dome-F Deep Coring Group (1998).

The 1 cm resolution depth profiles of soluble ion concentrations and the number concentrations of air bubbles, clathrate hydrates and micro-inclusions in the 17cm long cores are shown in Figure 1. The ratio of the number of hydrates to the total air inclusions, N h/N, is also presented in Figure 1 as an index of the degree of transformation from bubbles to hydrates. In spite of the similar temperature and pressure histories of all 1 cm layers studied, the N h/N varies significantly with depth, ranging between 0.44 and 0.84. This supports the heterogeneous hydrate nucleation in ice suggested previously (Reference Ohno, Lipenkov and HondohOhno and others, 2004). The layers with higher values of N h/N, as a rule, reveal higher ion concentrations and are characterized by higher N m values. This finding is consistent with the in situ observations of bubble-to-hydrate conversion in polar ice samples under high hydrostatic pressure, showing that the hydrate nuclea- tion rate is higher in the samples with greater soluble impurity content (Reference Shimada and HondohShimada and Hondoh, 2004). Figure 2 shows empirical relations observed between N h/N and the soluble ion concentrations and between N h/N and N m. The strongest correlations (R 2 = 0.43) were found between N h/N and Mg2+ and between N h/N and N m. Correlations between N h/N and Cl-, Na+ and K+ were relatively strong. Microinclusions consist mainly of water-soluble salts, and most of the water-soluble impurities are confined as salt inclusions (Reference Ohno, Lipenkov and HondohOhno and others, 2004). Therefore, these results indicate that micro-inclusions induce the hydrate nucleation.

Fig. 1. Depth profiles of soluble ion concentrations and the number concentrations of air bubbles, N b (dotted curve), clathrate hydrates, N h (solid curve), and micro-inclusions, N m, in the Dome Fuji ice from the bubble-to-hydrate transition zone. The ratio of the number of clathrate hydrates to the total air inclusion number, N h/N, can be considered an index of the degree of transformation from bubbles to hydrates.

Fig. 2. Correlations between the ratio of the number of clathrate hydrates to the total air inclusion number, N h/N, and the soluble ion concentrations, and the number concentration of micro-inclusions, N m.

Consistent with the above observation, micro-inclusions were frequently observed inside hydrates. Typical Raman spectra of micro-inclusions inside air hydrates are shown in Figure 3. Table 1 gives the results of statistical analyses of the microscopic observations. The number of micro-inclusions inside hydrates, N m’, was considerably higher than that in the ice matrix, N m, at all depths under consideration. The micro-inclusions were found in approximately 70% of hydrates. This is significantly higher than the estimate of N h’/Nh obtained assuming micro-inclusions are uniformly distributed in the ice matrix (values in parentheses in Table 1). These findings strongly support the idea that the clathration is induced by micro-inclusions.

Fig. 3. Micro-inclusions inside hydrate crystals found in the Dome Fuji ice from the bubble-to-hydrate transition zone and their Raman spectra. Raman peak assignments are based on Reference Nakahara, Shigesato, Higashi, Hondoh and LangwayNakahara and others (1988) and Reference Ohno, Igarashi and HondohOhno and others (2005). Detailed information on the Raman measurement is described elsewhere (Reference Ohno, Igarashi and HondohOhno and others, 2005).

Table 1. Statistical analyses of the location of micro-inclusions with respect to clathrate hydrates in the bubble-to-hydrate transition zone of the Dome Fuji ice. Nm and Nm′ are the number concentrations of micro-inclusions in the ice matrix and clathrate hydrates, respectively. Nh′/Nh represents the percentage of clathrate hydrates in which at least one micro-inclusion was observed. Values in parentheses show the calculations assuming that micro-inclusions are uniformly distributed in the ice matrix. N m′ was estimated from the size measurement of 100 clathrate hydrates measured for a given ice section and the number of micro-inclusions in the hydrates. Age estimations are from Reference Hondoh, Shoji, Watanabe, Salamatin and LipenkovHondoh and others (2002)

3. Discussion

As could be predicted from previous studies (Reference Ohno, Lipenkov and HondohOhno and others, 2004;Reference Shimada and HondohShimada and Hondoh, 2004), the presence of impurities in clathrate hydrates was observed. The evidence presented above indicates that micro-inclusions are the hydrate nucleation promoters. We can now explain the considerable macroscale redistribution of air inclusions in terms of their number and volume, which has been observed previously in the bubble-to-hydrate transition zone of the Dome Fuji core by Reference Ohno, Lipenkov and HondohOhno and others (2004), as follows. Though the bubble pressure reaches the dissociation pressure of air hydrates at a certain depth (˜400m at Dome Fuji), hydrates cannot start to nucleate at bubble walls spontaneously (Reference Hondoh and UchidaHondoh and Uchida, 1992), so air dissolved in the ice matrix becomes supersaturated. The supersaturation increases proportionally with increasing bubble pressure at greater depths, and finally hydrates start to nucleate on micro-inclusions by enclathrating the dissolved air. Though most air bubbles are located on grain boundaries at the beginning of the transition zone (500-750 m) (Reference Ohno, Lipenkov and HondohOhno and others, 2004), micro-inclusions mostly reside within ice grains and have relatively non-uniform spatial distribution (Reference Ohno, Igarashi and HondohOhno and others, 2005). Therefore, tiny hydrate crystals nucleated on micro-inclusions appear inside ice grains, sometimes as groups, as reported by Reference Kipfstuhl, Pauer, Kuhs and ShojiKipfstuhl and others (2001) and Reference Ohno, Lipenkov and HondohOhno and others (2004).

Assuming the heterogeneous hydrate nucleation on micro-inclusions outside air bubbles, we can now explain why hydrate crystals at the beginning of the transition zone (500-750 m) are already significantly enriched with oxygen. The difference in gas concentrations between the ice- bubble and ice-hydrate interfaces causes selective gas fluxes from bubble to hydrate (Reference IkedaIkeda and others, 1999). Since the diffusion of O2 is faster than that of N2 (Reference IkedaIkeda and others, 1999) and air occluded in hydrates formed outside the bubbles is entirely sourced from the diffusion process, the hydrates must have relatively low N2/O2 values at the start of hydrate formation as reported by Reference IkedaIkeda and others (1999) and Reference Ikeda-Fukazawa, Hondoh, Fukumura, Fukazawa and MaeIkeda-Fukazawa and others (2001).

Interestingly, Nm′/Nm decreases significantly with depth (Table 1), indicating active crystal growth after the hydrate nucleation, due to the selective air diffusion from bubbles to hydrates. This observation supports the suggestion (Reference Ohno, Lipenkov and HondohOhno and others, 2004) that the mass transfer between inclusions by the diffusion through the ice matrix results in considerable changes in volume concentrations of air inclusion observed in the transition zone.

Though N m′ is significantly higher than N m (Table 1), the number of micro-inclusions in clathrate hydrates accounts for <2% of the total number of micro-inclusions in the ice matrix (the percentage was estimated from N m, N m′ and the volume fraction of hydrates in the ice matrix), indicating that only part of the micro-inclusions contribute to hydrate nucleation. The distribution of air inclusions in the transition zone suggests that the heterogeneous hydrate nucleation outside air bubbles occurs mainly at the beginning of bubble-to-hydrate transformation (500-750 m;Reference Ohno, Lipenkov and HondohOhno and others, 2004). We consider that the gas supersaturation in the ice matrix decreases to a level insufficient for heterogeneous nucleation outside air bubbles after the initial hydrate crystals have formed, so further nucleation away from air bubbles will not occur in the remaining stage of the transition.

Micro-inclusions may also help hydrates to nucleate at bubble walls. As shown by Reference Ohno, Lipenkov and HondohOhno and others (2004), most air bubbles were observed on the ice grain boundaries at the beginning of the transition zone, despite the migration of the boundaries due to ice grain growth. This means that bubbles can migrate with the grain boundaries (the mechanism of this phenomenon is described in Reference Alley, Perepezko and BentleyAlley and others, 1986). When bubbles collide with micro-inclusions in the course of the migration, the hydration may start on the inclusions in some cases. On the other hand, analyzing the spatial distribution of air inclusions indicates that many air bubbles completely expire before the nucleation due to the gas outflow toward the coexisting hydrates, resulting in a decrease in the total number concentration of air inclusions from the midpoint to the bottom of the transition zone (850-1200 m) (Reference Ohno, Lipenkov and HondohOhno and others, 2004). To sum up, a series of observations suggests that the heterogeneous hydrate nucleation outside air bubbles, normal bubble-to-hydrate conversion (with the help of micro-inclusions in some cases) and subsequent diffusive transport of air molecules from bubbles to hydrates take place in the ice sheet. A combination of these processes causes the complicated redistribution of air components in the ice matrix.

Reference Hondoh and UchidaHondoh and Uchida (1992) discussed the hydrate nucleation on ice surfaces, based on homogeneous nucleation theory (discussion can also be found in Reference Uchida, Hondoh and HondohUchida and Hondoh, 2000). They estimated that the energy barrier of the nucleation and the critical size of a nucleus under polar ice- sheet conditions are several hundred electron volts and tens of nanometers, respectively. Since these values are too large to explain the actual occurrence of hydrates in polar ice, they concluded that particular sites which provide a low- energy barrier for the clathration must be considered.

In general, faulty ice matrix (defects) can induce hydrate nucleation since dangling bonds facilitate rearrangement of water molecules from the ice to clathrate structures (Reference Kuhs, Klapproth, Chazallon and HondohKuhs and others, 2000). For example, Reference Jin, Oyama, Nagao, Ebinuma, Narita, Eglezos and RipmeesterJin and others (2008) performed in situ observations of Xe hydrate growth on polycrystalline ice with X-ray computer tomography. They reported that hydrate nucleation often occurred at ice grain boundaries exposed to the gas phase (grooves). In that sense, air bubbles in the polar ice are suitable for hydrate formation, because most air bubbles are in contact with ice grain boundaries (Reference Ohno, Lipenkov and HondohOhno and others, 2004), and their walls, effectively, are ‘large-scale ice defects’. However, our observations indicate that a significant amount of hydrate can nucleate outside the bubbles (Reference Ohno, Lipenkov and HondohOhno and others, 2004), suggesting the presence of more effective nucleation sites.

Another aspect for gas hydrate nucleation is the collection of gas molecules, which is essential to stabilize clathrate cages. S. Kipfstuhl and others (unpublished information) reported that micro-bubbles start to form on micro-inclusions in relaxing ice cores. The ice matrix is supersaturated with dissolved gases during relaxation. Micro-bubbles that appear after core retrieval are considered to form due to the supersaturation of gas molecules in the ice matrix. If micro-inclusions work as nucleation sites for micro-bubbles, it means that micro-inclusions can adsorb gas molecules effectively for the hydrate nucleation. We note that the Dome Fuji ice core examined here has been stored at a low temperature (˜-50°C) to avoid formation of micro-bubbles. Consequently, we observed only a few micro-bubbles in studied ice samples.

Results of this work indicate that micro-inclusions are the nucleation sites for hydrate nucleation. We consider that surfaces of some micro-inclusions work as a template of clathrate structures and also as a good adsorbent of gas molecules. Analysis of micro-inclusions inside hydrate with micro-Raman spectroscopy and a scanning electron microscope (energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy), currently underway, will reveal the salt structures and components essential for the heterogeneous hydrate nucleation and will provide a clue to the detailed mechanism of the nucleation.

Finally, our findings may have important implications for the interpretation of high-resolution gas records obtained from polar ice cores. The probability of nucleation often has a distribution characterized by a striped pattern as previously reported for the Dome Fuji core (Reference Ohno, Lipenkov and HondohOhno and others, 2004). Reference Faria, Freitag and KipfstuhlFaria and others (2010) have observed a layered bubble-hydrate conversion in the EPICA-DML (Dronning Maud Land, Antarctica) ice core. We argue that this secondary layering of air inclusions is probably caused by a sedimentary layering of micro-inclusions. If hydrates were nucleating uniformly in ice, the original distribution of air content would remain unchanged despite the mass transfer between bubbles and hydrates. However, the non-uniform distribution of a hydrate nucleation rate may provoke a macroscopic gas flux from a layer where relatively many bubbles remain, to a layer in which the bubble-to-hydrate transition proceeds faster, resulting in significant redistribution of air constituents. Anomalous depth profiles of gas compositions, probably due to strong fractionations between the bubbly and hydrate-rich layers, were first reported by Reference Huber and LeuenbergerHuber and Leuenberger (2004). They performed high- resolution measurements of the isotope and elemental ratios of air in the Greenland Icecore Project (GRIP) ice core and found that the elemental ratios (e.g. Ar/O2 and O2/N2) show roughly annual (cm-scale) variations at depths where air bubbles convert into hydrates, although such variations were not observed at shallower depths. Recently, similar anomalies in CO2 and O2/N2 variations in and just below the bubble-hydrate transition zone have been found in the EPICA-DML core (Reference LuthiLuthi and others, 2010).

We are now developing a global bubble-to-hydrate model incorporating the processes described above. We expect that the new model based on the new findings will allow more accurate evaluation of the modifications of climate signals that occur in the properties of air inclusions during the transition.

Acknowledgements

We thank all participants for fieldwork, ice sampling and logistical support. This research is supported by a Grant-inAid for Creative Scientific Research, Japan. We thank S. Kipfstuhl and an anonymous reviewer for valuable comments.

References

Alley, R.B., Perepezko, J.H. and Bentley, C.R.. 1986. Grain growth in polar ice: I. Theory. J. Glaciol., 32(112), 415-424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkov, N.I. and Lipenkov, V.Y.. 1984. Kolichestvennaya kharakter- istika struktury l’da do glubiny 1400 m v rayone stantsii Vostok v Antarktide [Numerical characteristics of ice structure down to a depth of 1400 m in the region of Vostok station, Antarctica]. Mater. Glyatsiol. Issled. 51, 178-186. [In Russian with English summary.]Google Scholar
Dome-F Deep Coring Group. 1998. Deep ice-core drilling at Dome Fuji and glaciological studies in east Dronning Maud Land, Antarctica. Ann. Glaciol., 27, 333-337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faria, S.H., Freitag, J. and Kipfstuhl, S.. 2010. Polar ice structure and the integrity of ice-core paleoclimate records. Quat. Sci. Rev., 29(1-2), 338-351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hondoh, T. and Uchida, T.. 1992. Formation process of clathrate air-hydrate crystals in polar ice sheets. Low Temp. Sci., Ser. A 51, 197-212. [In Japanese with English summary.]Google Scholar
Hondoh, T., Shoji, H., Watanabe, O., Salamatin, A.N. and Lipenkov, V.Y.. 2002. Depth-age and temperature prediction at Dome Fuji station, East Antarctica. Ann. Glaciol., 35, 384-390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, C. and Leuenberger, M.. 2004. Measurements of isotope and elemental ratios of air from polar ice with a new on-line extraction method. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst, 5(Q10), Q10002. (10.1029/2004GC000766.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Igarashi, M., Kanamori, N. and Watanabe, O.. 1998. Analytical method for small amount of polar snow and ice samples by ion chromatography. Antarct. Rec., 42(1), 64-80. [In Japanese with English summary.]Google Scholar
Ikeda, T. and 7 others. 1999. Extreme fractionation of gases caused by formation of clathrate hydrates in Vostok Antarctic ice. Geophys. Res. Lett., 26(1), 91-94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikeda-Fukazawa, T., Hondoh, T., Fukumura, T., Fukazawa, H. and Mae, S.. 2001. Variation in N2/O2 ratio of occluded air in Dome Fuji antarctic ice. J. Geophys. Res., 106(D16), 17,799-17,810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jin, Y.K., Oyama, H., Nagao, J., Ebinuma, T. and Narita, H.. 2008. Observation of Xe gas hydrate formation on ice by X-ray imaging and in situ near-infrared measurement. In Eglezos, P. and Ripmeester, J., eds. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Gas Hydrates, 6-10 July 2008, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, P099. CD-ROM.Google Scholar
Kawamura, K. and 17 others. 2007. Northern Hemisphere forcing of climatic cycles in Antarctica over the past 360,000 years. Nature, 448(7156), 912-916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kipfstuhl, S., Pauer, F., Kuhs, W.F. and Shoji, H.. 2001. Air bubbles and clathrate hydrates in the transition zone of the NGRIP deep ice core. Geophys. Res. Lett., 28(4), 591-594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhs, W.F., Klapproth, A. and Chazallon, B.. 2000. Chemical physics of air clathrate hydrates. In Hondoh, T., ed. Physics of ice core records. Sapporo, Hokkaido University Press, 373-392.Google Scholar
Lipenkov, V.Ya. 2000. Air bubbles and air-hydrate crystals in the Vostok ice core. In Hondoh, T., ed. Physics of ice core records. Sapporo, Hokkaido University Press, 327-358.Google Scholar
Luthi, D. and 10 others. 2008. High-resolution carbon dioxide concentration record 650,000-800,000 years before present. Nature, 453(7193), 379-382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luthi, D. and 10 others. 2010. CO2 and O2/N2 variations in and just below the bubble-clathrate transformation zone of Antarctic ice cores. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 297(1-2), 226-233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakahara, J., Shigesato, Y., Higashi, A., Hondoh, T. and Langway, C.C. Jr. 1988. Raman spectra of natural clathrates in deep ice cores. Philos. Mag. B, 57(3), 421-430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narita, H. and 8 others. 1999. Characteristics of air bubbles and hydrates in the Dome Fuji ice core, Antarctica. Ann. Glaciol., 29, 207-210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohno, H., Lipenkov, V.Ya. and Hondoh, T.. 2004. Air bubble to clathrate hydrate transformation in polar ice sheets: a reconsideration based on the new data from Dome Fuji ice core. Geophys. Res. Lett., 31 (L21), L21401. (10.1029/2004GL021151.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohno, H., Igarashi, A. and Hondoh, T.. 2005. Salt inclusions in polar ice core, location and chemical form of water-soluble impurities. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 232(1-2), 171-178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauer, F., Kipfstuhl, J., Kuhs, W.F. and Shoji, H.. 1999. Air clathrate crystals from the GRIP deep ice core: a number-, size- and shape-distribution study. J. Glaciol., 45(149), 22-30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salamatin, A.N., Hondoh, T., Uchida, T. and Lipenkov, V.Y.. 1998. Post-nucleation conversion of an air bubble to clathrate air- hydrate crystal in ice. J. Cryst. Growth, 193(1-2), 197-218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salamatin, A.N., Lipenkov, V.Ya. and Hondoh, T.. 2003. Air- hydrate crystal growth in polar ice. J. Cryst. Growth, 257(3-4), 412-426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimada, W. and Hondoh, T.. 2004. In situ observation of the transformation from air bubbles to air clathrate hydrate crystals using a Mizuho ice core. J. Cryst. Growth, 265(1-2), 309-317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uchida, T. and Hondoh, T.. 2000. Laboratory studies on air-hydrate crystals. In Hondoh, T., ed. Physics of ice core records. Sapporo, Hokkaido University Press, 423-457.Google Scholar
Uchida, T., Hondoh, T., Mae, S., Duval, P. and Lipenkov, V.Y.. 1992. In-situ observations of growth process of clathrate air-hydrates under hydrostatic pressure. In Maeno, N. and Hondoh, T., eds. Physics and chemistry of ice. Sapporo, Hokkaido University Press, 121-125.Google Scholar
Uchida, T., Hondoh, T., Mae, S., Lipenkov, V.Y. and Duval, P.. 1994a. Air-hydrate crystals in deep ice-core samples from Vostok Station, Antarctica. J. Glaciol., 40(134), 79-86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uchida, T., Hondoh, T., Mae, S., Duval, P. and Lipenkov, V.Y.. 1994b. Effects of temperature and pressure on the transformation rate from air bubbles to air-hydrate crystals in ice sheets. Ann. Glaciol., 20, 143-147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Depth profiles of soluble ion concentrations and the number concentrations of air bubbles, Nb (dotted curve), clathrate hydrates, Nh (solid curve), and micro-inclusions, Nm, in the Dome Fuji ice from the bubble-to-hydrate transition zone. The ratio of the number of clathrate hydrates to the total air inclusion number, Nh/N, can be considered an index of the degree of transformation from bubbles to hydrates.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Correlations between the ratio of the number of clathrate hydrates to the total air inclusion number, Nh/N, and the soluble ion concentrations, and the number concentration of micro-inclusions, Nm.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Micro-inclusions inside hydrate crystals found in the Dome Fuji ice from the bubble-to-hydrate transition zone and their Raman spectra. Raman peak assignments are based on Nakahara and others (1988) and Ohno and others (2005). Detailed information on the Raman measurement is described elsewhere (Ohno and others, 2005).

Figure 3

Table 1. Statistical analyses of the location of micro-inclusions with respect to clathrate hydrates in the bubble-to-hydrate transition zone of the Dome Fuji ice. Nm and Nm′ are the number concentrations of micro-inclusions in the ice matrix and clathrate hydrates, respectively. Nh′/Nh represents the percentage of clathrate hydrates in which at least one micro-inclusion was observed. Values in parentheses show the calculations assuming that micro-inclusions are uniformly distributed in the ice matrix. Nm′ was estimated from the size measurement of 100 clathrate hydrates measured for a given ice section and the number of micro-inclusions in the hydrates. Age estimations are from Hondoh and others (2002)