Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-12T09:10:24.563Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Temporal downscaling of glaciological mass balance using seasonal observations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 October 2023

Michael Zemp Open the ORCID record for Michael Zemp [Opens in a new window]  and
Ethan Welty Open the ORCID record for Ethan Welty [Opens in a new window]
Michael Zemp*
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Ethan Welty
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
*
Corresponding author: Michael Zemp; Email: michael.zemp@geo.uzh.ch
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Glaciological mass-balance measurements have been the backbone of internationally coordinated glacier monitoring. The resulting annual observations have been used to understand glacier reactions to climate change, and to assess both regional and global glacier mass changes and related contributions to runoff and sea-level rise. However, the comparability of annual observations is hampered by differences in survey periods and mass-balance amplitudes between glaciers, regions and hemispheres. This study presents a simple approach to temporally downscale glaciological mass balance using seasonal observations and sine functions. The proposed analytical model allows reconstruction of the seasonal course of glacier mass balance at weekly to monthly resolution from only annual or seasonal observations. Strengths and limitations of this analytical approach are discussed and compared with results from numerical mass-balance modelling. Potential applications include seasonal corrections of glaciological and geodetic observations and comparisons to monthly results from spaceborne gravimetry and altimetry.

Keywords

Glacier mass balanceglacier modellingglacier monitoringtemporal downscaling
Type
Letter
Information
Journal of Glaciology , First View , pp. 1 - 6
Check for updates
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The International Glaciological Society

1. Introduction

The glaciological method determines mass balance in situ on the glacier surface by observations of accumulation and ablation (Cogley and others, Reference Cogley2011). Generally, this includes measurements at stakes and in snow pits, which are interpolated to glacier-wide balance estimates (Østrem and Brugman, Reference Østrem and Brugman1991). Pioneer research measuring annual mass balances at individual stakes was carried out already at the end of the 19th century (Mercanton, Reference Mercanton1916; Chen and Funk, Reference Chen and Funk1990). Glacier-wide observations of annual or seasonal mass balances using the glaciological method (based on Ahlmann, Reference Ahlmann1948) have become the key component of internationally coordinated glacier monitoring since the mid-20th century (Zemp and others, Reference Zemp2015). Annual mass-balance estimates have been used to understand glacier reactions to climate change (Kuhn, Reference Kuhn1981; Vincent and others, Reference Vincent2017), and to assess regional to global glacier mass changes as well as related contributions to runoff (Huss and Hock, Reference Huss and Hock2018) and sea-level rise (Meier, Reference Meier1984; Kaser and others, Reference Kaser, Cogley, Dyurgerov, Meier and Ohmura2006; Gardner and others, Reference Gardner2013; Zemp and others, Reference Zemp2019). The vast majority of regional to global studies have focused on annual mass balances, while only a few studies have made use of seasonal mass-balance observations (e.g. Dyurgerov and Meier, Reference Dyurgerov and Meier1999; Braithwaite, Reference Braithwaite2009; Barandun and others, Reference Barandun2015; Azam and others, Reference Azam2016; O'Neel and others, Reference O'Neel2019; Braithwaite and Hughes, Reference Braithwaite and Hughes2020; Mukherjee and others, Reference Mukherjee2023). However, the use of annual mass-balance observations comes with some limitations. The comparability of annual results is hampered by differences in survey periods and in mass-balance amplitudes between glaciers, regions and hemispheres. For example, glaciers in the Canadian Arctic and in New Zealand can record the same annual balance despite mass-balance amplitudes ranging from less than half a metre in the Canadian Arctic to a few metres in New Zealand. Their survey periods are also shifted by half a year. Corresponding seasonal observations provide information on winter and summer balances but are only conducted on a subset of glaciers and years for financial or logistical reasons (Braithwaite, Reference Braithwaite2009), or because of an absence of a climatic winter and summer cycle (e.g. in the tropics or in monsoon areas). Similarly, glaciological observations following different time systems (i.e. fixed date, floating date, stratigraphic; Cogley and others, Reference Cogley2011) as well as temporal differences between glaciological and geodetic surveys can result in mass-balance differences of more than 0.5 m w.e. a−1 (Huss and others, Reference Huss, Bauder and Funk2009; Zemp and others, Reference Zemp2013). Numerical modelling of glacier mass balance (e.g. Huss and others, Reference Huss, Dhulst and Bauder2015; Maussion and others, Reference Maussion2019; Rounce and others, Reference Rounce2020) can address these issues but requires computational resources, programming knowledge and meteorological input data. In this study, we present a simple analytical approach to ‘temporally downscale’ (cf. von Storch and Zorita, Reference von Storch and Zorita2019; Finkenbiner and others, Reference Finkenbiner, Good, Allen, Fiorella and Bowen2021) seasonal mass balances using sine functions. Two versions of the approach allow accommodating observational gaps in the glaciological records. The first version scales the sine wave from winter and summer balance observations of the corresponding hydrological year (Cogley and others, Reference Cogley2011). For years with only annual balances, seasonal balances are estimated from the long-term mean mass-balance amplitude calculated from years with seasonal balances. The two versions of the analytical model are illustrated and discussed together with results from numerical modelling by Huss and others (Reference Huss, Dhulst and Bauder2015) estimating the daily mass-balance evolution of Basòdino Glacier, Switzerland, for the hydrological years from 1991/92 to 2021/22.

2. Data and methods

Glaciological observations have been compiled and made available by the World Glacier Monitoring Service (WGMS; https://wgms.ch) and predecessor organizations since 1894 (Forel, Reference Forel1895; WGMS, 2021 and earlier reports). The mass-balance measurements of Basòdino Glacier are carried out by Glacier Monitoring Switzerland (GLAMOS, 2022) and the observational series has recently been extended back in time through data rescue and data homogenization efforts (Huss and others, Reference Huss, Dhulst and Bauder2015; Geibel and others, Reference Geibel2022).

The latest version of the WGMS Fluctuations of Glaciers database (WGMS, 2022) contains ~7600 glaciological mass-balance records from 480 glaciers. These data come with five main limitations as schematically illustrated in Table 1: (1) 40% of the glaciological data lack seasonal balances, either because they were not measured, not reported or not defined by climate. Of the 270 glaciers with seasonal balances, only half have them throughout their series. The other half lack seasonal values for 30% of the years. (2) In total, 23% of the records provide seasonal balances but do not report dates, only the hydrological year. (3) In total, 17% of the records provide dates based on the stratigraphic system (cf. Cogley and others, Reference Cogley2011). In this system, observations refer to stratigraphic horizons of the previous annual minima (i.e. ‘the last summer horizon’) and, hence, come without exact begin dates. (4, 5) In total, 20% of the records come with seasonal balances and are based on either the (4) fixed-date or (5) floating-date system (cf. Cogley and others, Reference Cogley2011), providing exact dates referring to the hydrological year or to the field surveys, respectively. Glaciological observations are synchronized with the natural progression of the hydrological year that begins near the start of the accumulation season and ends near the end of the ablation season (cf. Cogley and others, Reference Cogley2011). As such, the hydrological year is defined to run from 1 October to 30 September in the mid-latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere.

Table 1. Schematic overview of the glaciological observations available from the Fluctuations of Glaciers database (WGMS, 2022).

Each sample (#) illustrates a typical issue: (1) annual (B a) without winter (B w) and summer (B s) balances; (2) seasonal balances without dates; seasonal balances based on (3) stratigraphic, (4) fixed-date and (5) floating-date systems.

In order to exploit the full observational sample, we need an analytical function that can temporally downscale mass balance for years with seasonal observations but also for years with only annual balances. In both cases, the function should be able to deal not only with observations that have exact dates but also with observations that come with fuzzy or no dates.

Glaciological balances are strongly correlated with air temperature and global solar radiation (Ohmura and others, Reference Ohmura, Bauder, Müller and Kappenberger2007), which can be idealized over the annual cycle by sine waves (Fujita, Reference Fujita2008). Hence, we use sine waves to represent the instantaneous mass balance (b) as a function of time over the hydrological year. Winter and summer, defined as the intervals [0, m] and [m, 1], are each represented by one hump (or half-cycle) of a sine wave of the form:

(1)$$b( t ) = A\sin ( {\omega ( t-\varphi } ) ) , \;$$

where t is time, φ and ω are chosen to match the start and width of the season and A is chosen such that the integral over the season equals the seasonal balance. The mass balance for an arbitrary time interval [i, j] is then the integral of b(t):

(2)$$B( {i, \;j} ) = \mathop \smallint \limits_i^j b( t ) {\rm d}t = \displaystyle{A \over \omega }( {\cos ( {\omega ( {i-\varphi } ) } ) -\cos ( {\omega ( {\,j-\varphi } ) } ) } ) .$$

The parameter values for winter (w) and summer (s) are as follows:

(3)$$\varphi _{\rm w} = 0, \;$$
(4)$$\omega _{\rm w} = \displaystyle{\pi \over m}, \;$$
(5)$$A_{\rm w} = \displaystyle{{B_{\rm w}\omega _{\rm w}} \over 2}, \;$$
(6)$$\varphi _{\rm s} = m, \;$$
(7)$$\omega _{\rm s} = \displaystyle{\pi \over {1-m}}, \;$$
(8)$$A_{\rm s} = \displaystyle{{B_{\rm s}\omega _{\rm s}} \over 2}, \;$$

For years with only an annual balance (B a), we prescribe a mass-balance amplitude (α) – defined as half the difference between the winter (B w) and summer (B s) balances (Braithwaite and Hughes, Reference Braithwaite and Hughes2020) – from which we calculate seasonal balances:

(9)$${\alpha} = \displaystyle{{\vert {B_{\rm w}-B_{\rm s}} \vert } \over 2}, \;$$
(10)$$B_{\rm w} = \displaystyle{{B_{\rm a}} \over 2} + {\alpha, \;}$$
(11)$$B_{\rm s} = \displaystyle{{B_{\rm a}} \over 2}-{\alpha}.$$

α corresponds to the climatic amplitude of the glacier mass balance. It can be estimated from years with seasonal balances from the same glacier, or, if not available, from neighbouring glaciers with similar mass turnover (Braithwaite and Hughes, Reference Braithwaite and Hughes2020). In our example for Basòdino Glacier, we upscaled B w, B s and B a from daily balances computed by Huss and others (Reference Huss, Dhulst and Bauder2015) in order to ensure consistency in long-term trends with our sine wave approach. α was calculated as the mean of the mass-balance amplitudes from each year with seasonal balances.

3. Results and discussion

The characteristics of the sine wave approach are illustrated in Figure 1. We can scale the two sine functions to fit winter and summer balances separately. The integrals over each season equal the seasonal balances, and the sum of these equals the annual balance. Years with only annual observations are treated in the same way by calculating seasonal balances from an assumed mass-balance amplitude estimated from other years (or neighbouring glaciers) with seasonal balances.

Figure 1. Representation of glaciological mass balance using sine waves (a) together with corresponding cumulative balances (b). The illustrated example is given for daily balances downscaled from B w = 0.5 m w.e., B s = −1.0 m w.e. and B a = −0.5 m w.e., and for a hydrological year of 365 days with eight winter and four summer months (i.e. m = 8/12).

The results from the analytical model are now compared to the output from a numerical model, employing the example of Basòdino Glacier, Switzerland (Fig. 2), in order to illustrate the strengths and limitations of the sine wave approach. The distributed accumulation and temperature-index melt model by Huss and others (Reference Huss, Dhulst and Bauder2015) uses daily air temperature and precipitation data as forcing and has been calibrated with seasonal glaciological balances from GLAMOS (2022). The plots of the daily balances (Figs 2a, b) illustrate that the numerical model is able to estimate daily accumulation and ablation events thanks to the meteorological forcing, whereas the sine wave approach can reasonably downscale glacier mass balance to weekly to monthly resolution, but has no information about daily events. The cumulative plots (Figs 2c, d) nicely illustrate the ability of the sine wave approach to well represent the seasonal course of glacier mass balance within and between years. As expected, the cumulative values of both models match at the start dates of the winter and of the summer seasons due to the calibration to the same glaciological observations. The zoom to the hydrological years 2020/21 and 2021/22 (Figs 2b, d) shows that the sine wave approach scaled with seasonal balances performs better in years (e.g. 2020/21) where the annual mass-balance amplitude is close to mean amplitude, which was used to estimate the seasonal balances. In 2021/22, the strongly-negative summer balances resulted in an underestimation of the amplitude.

Figure 2. Model comparison between sine wave approaches (this study) and a numerical model run (Huss and others, Reference Huss, Dhulst and Bauder2015) using glaciological observations (GLAMOS, 2022) from Basòdino Glacier, Switzerland, for the hydrological years from 1991/92 to 2021/22. The results are shown as daily balances (a, b) and cumulative daily balances (c, d), with a zoom to the hydrological years 2020/21 and 2021/22 (b, d) as indicated by the grey shading.

A quantitative comparison of the results (Figs 3a–d) shows that the sine wave approach performs similarly with or without seasonal balances over the full 30-year period, and better matches the numerical model results with increasing temporal aggregation. At daily resolution, the balances of the sine wave approach follow a mean seasonal course and, hence, are not able to reproduce high-frequency meteorological events. Averaged over longer time periods, the model performance improves, with RMSE decreasing by one order of magnitude from daily to seasonal aggregation. The comparison for cumulative balances (Figs 3e–h) shows an overall good model fit, independent of the temporal aggregation, and a better performance of the sine wave approach from seasonal balances (RMSE between 0.23 and 0.29 m) than the one from annual balances and balance amplitude (RMSE between 0.30 and 0.35 m). With regards to applications, it can be stated that the sine wave approaches can reliably estimate balances over weeks or months while daily variations cannot be reproduced. As such, the approach has the potential to correct cumulative differences in survey periods between glaciers, regions and hemispheres.

Figure 3. Model comparison between sine wave approaches (this study, y-axis) and a numerical model run (Huss and others, Reference Huss, Dhulst and Bauder2015; x-axis). The results are shown as mean daily balances aggregated at daily (a), weekly (b), monthly (c) and seasonal (d) resolution as well as corresponding cumulative balances (e, f, g, h). Linear regressions between the sine wave approaches and the numerical model are shown with corresponding regression statistics (R 2, RMSE). The blue line indicates the predicted values for a perfect model fit.

Temporal downscaling of glaciological observations – using analytical or numerical models – offers the possibility to compute continuous time series and provides a richer view of glacier mass changes (Braithwaite, Reference Braithwaite2009). As such, these time series clearly demonstrate that the seasonal variability of glacier mass balance can be orders of magnitude larger than the long-term trend (Braithwaite and Hughes, Reference Braithwaite and Hughes2020), and differences in survey periods can hamper direct comparison of annual balances (Huss and others, Reference Huss, Bauder and Funk2009). The proposed analytical model based on sine functions provides an approach to deal with these issues, especially for users without access to numerical models and for cases that need to be independent of meteorological forcings. It can be applied to all glaciers with seasonal mass-balance observations and might be extended to other glaciers with similar mass-balance variability and amplitudes (Braithwaite and Hughes, Reference Braithwaite and Hughes2020), which typically are well correlated over several hundred kilometres (Letréguilly and Reynaud, Reference Letréguilly and Reynaud1990; Cogley and Adams, Reference Cogley and Adams1998). The main strength and – at the same time – limitation of the analytical approach is its sole dependency on glaciological input data and its basic assumption of distinct seasons of winter accumulation and summer ablation. As such, the approach is restricted to regions with available seasonal glaciological observation but cannot resolve the course of balances in tropical or monsoonal climate regimes, which is not captured in the traditional glaciological observations of winter, summer and annual balances.

Potential applications include the illustration of seasonal balances of glaciers, especially when located at different latitudes, for educational and outreach purposes (e.g. WGMS, 2021; C3S, 2022); seasonal corrections of glaciological and geodetic observations covering different survey periods (e.g. Zemp and others, Reference Zemp2013), although not solving issues related to density conversion (cf. Huss, Reference Huss2013); and comparison of glaciological results with those from other methods that provide results at monthly time resolution, such as spaceborne gravimetry (e.g. Wouters and others, Reference Wouters, Gardner and Moholdt2019) or altimetry (e.g. Jakob and others, Reference Jakob, Gourmelen, Ewart and Plummer2021).

4. Conclusions

Temporal downscaling of glaciological observations – using analytical or numerical models – allows the calculation of continuous time series and provides a more comprehensive picture of glacier mass-balance variability. The proposed analytical model uses sine functions and seasonal mass-balance observations to temporally downscale the seasonal course of glacier mass balance at weekly to monthly resolution; it can deal with observational gaps as well as with different durations of winter and summer periods. The approach allows estimations of the seasonal variability of glacier mass balance to be made, which can be orders of magnitude larger than the long-term trend; it can also contribute to the correction of differences in survey periods, which hamper direct comparison of results from different glaciers or observational sources. The presented sine wave can provide a much richer view of glaciological observations, especially for users without access to numerical models and for use cases that need to be independent of meteorological forcings.

Acknowledgements

The present work is a contribution to the Working Group on Regional Assessment of Glacier Mass Change (RAGMAC) of the International Association of Cryospheric Sciences (IACS) and the Glacier Mass Balance Intercomparison Exercise (GlaMBIE, Contract No. 4000138018/22/I-DT) supported by the European Space Agency (ESA), and was enabled by support from the European Union's Horizon 2020 project Global Gravity-based Groundwater Product (G3P, Grant Agreement No. 870353). We thank the Scientific Editor, Shad O'Neel, for his guidance through the review process and the two anonymous referees for their constructive feedback, which helped to sharpen the letter. We are indebted to Livia Piermattei, Inés Dussaillant, Regine Hock and Matthias Huss for fruitful discussions on temporal downscaling of glaciological mass-balance observations. We also thank Matthias Huss for providing daily balance series from numerical model runs, and Pam Alean-Kirkpatrick for polishing our English.

Data

Access to glaciological observations is provided by GLAMOS (https://doi.org/10.18750/massbalance.2022.r2022) and by WGMS (https://doi.org/10.5904/wgms-fog-2022-09).

Code availability

Code implementing our analytical sine wave approach is available on GitHub: https://github.com/wgms-org/mb-downscaling.

Author contributions

M.Z. developed the concept of the study, wrote a first version of the code, carried out the analysis, prepared figures and tables and wrote the manuscript. E.W. revised the method, polished the code, and contributed to the revision of the manuscript.

References

Ahlmann, HW (1948) Glaciological Research on the North Atlantic Coasts. London: Research S. Royal Geographical Society.Google Scholar
Azam, MF and 10 others (2016) Meteorological conditions, seasonal and annual mass balances of Chhota Shigri Glacier, Western Himalaya, India. Annals of Glaciology 57(71), 328–338. doi: 10.3189/2016AoG71A570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barandun, M and 8 others (2015) Re-analysis of seasonal mass balance at Abramov Glacier 1968–2014. Journal of Glaciology 61(230), 1103–1117. doi: 10.3189/2015JoG14J239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, RJ (2009) After six decades of monitoring glacier mass balance we still need data but it should be richer data. Annals of Glaciology 50(50), 191–197. doi: 10.3189/172756409787769573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, RJ and Hughes, PD (2020) Regional geography of glacier mass balance variability over seven decades 1946–2015. Frontiers of Earth Science 8(302). doi: 10.3389/feart.2020.00302Google Scholar
C3S (2022) European State of the Climate 2021. Reading, UK. https://climate.copernicus.eu/esotc/2021Google Scholar
Chen, J and Funk, M (1990) Mass balance of Rhonegletsher during 1882/83–1986/87. Journal of Glaciology 36(123), 199–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cogley, JG and Adams, WP (1998) Mass balance of glaciers other than the ice sheets. Journal of Glaciology 44(147), 315–325. doi: 10.3189/S0022143000002641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cogley, JG and 10 others (2011) Glossary of glacier mass balance and related terms. IHP-VII Technical Documents in Hydrology No. 86, IACS Contribution No. 2. UNESCO-IHP, Paris, France. unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0019/001925/192525e.pdfGoogle Scholar
Dyurgerov, MB and Meier, MF (1999) Analysis of winter and summer glacier mass balances. Geografiska Annaler: Series A, Physical Geography 81(1), 541–554. doi: 10.1111/1468-0459.00082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkenbiner, CE, Good, SP, Allen, ST, Fiorella, RP and Bowen, GJ (2021) A statistical method for generating temporally downscaled geochemical tracers in precipitation. Journal of Hydrometeorology 22(6), 1473–1486. doi: 10.1175/JHM-D-20-0142.1Google Scholar
Forel, FA (1895) Les variations périodiques des glaciers. Discours préliminaire. Extr. des Archives des Sciences Physiques et Naturelles XXXIV, 209–229.Google Scholar
Fujita, K (2008) Effect of precipitation seasonality on climatic sensitivity of glacier mass balance. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 276(1–2), 14–19. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2008.08.028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, AS and 15 others (2013) A reconciled estimate of glacier contributions to Sea level rise: 2003 to 2009. Science (80–.) 340(6134), 852–857. doi: 10.1126/science.1234532CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geibel, L and 5 others (2022) Rescue and homogenization of 140 years of glacier mass balance data in Switzerland. Earth System Science Data 14(7), 3293–3312. doi: 10.5194/essd-14-3293-2022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GLAMOS (2022) Swiss Glacier Mass Balance (release 2022). doi: 10.18750/massbalance.2022.r2022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huss, M (2013) Density assumptions for converting geodetic glacier volume change to mass change. The Cryosphere 7(3), 877–887. doi: 10.5194/tc-7-877-2013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huss, M and Hock, R (2018) Global-scale hydrological response to future glacier mass loss. Nature Climate Change 8(2), 135–140. doi: 10.1038/s41558-017-0049-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huss, M, Bauder, A and Funk, M (2009) Homogenization of long-term mass-balance time series. Annals of Glaciology 50(50), 198–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huss, M, Dhulst, L and Bauder, A (2015) New long-term mass-balance series for the Swiss Alps. Journal of Glaciology 61(227), 551–562. doi: 10.3189/2015JoG15J015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakob, L, Gourmelen, N, Ewart, M and Plummer, S (2021) Spatially and temporally resolved ice loss in High Mountain Asia and the Gulf of Alaska observed by CryoSat-2 swath altimetry between 2010 and 2019. The Cryosphere 15(4), 1845–1862. doi: 10.5194/tc-15-1845-2021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaser, G, Cogley, JG, Dyurgerov, MB, Meier, MF and Ohmura, A (2006) Mass balance of glaciers and ice caps: consensus estimates for 1961–2004. Geophysical Research Letters 33(19), 1–5. doi: 10.1029/2006GL027511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, M (1981) Climate and glaciers. IAHS 131, 3–20.Google Scholar
Letréguilly, A and Reynaud, L (1990) Space and time distribution of glacier mass-balance in the Northern Hemisphere. Arctic and Alpine Research 22(1), 43–50. doi: 10.1080/00040851.1990.12002764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maussion, F and 14 others (2019) The Open Global Glacier Model (OGGM) v1.1. Geoscientific Model Development 12(3), 909–931. doi: 10.5194/gmd-12-909-2019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, MF (1984) The contribution of small glaciers to sea level rise. Science 226(4681), 1418–1421. doi: 10.1126/science.226.4681.1418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercanton, PL (1916) Vermessungen am Rhonegletscher/Mensurations au Glacier du Rhone: 1874–1915. Neue Denkschrift der Schweizerischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft 52, 189.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, K and 5 others (2023) Evaluation of surface mass-balance records using geodetic data and physically-based modelling, Place and Peyto glaciers, Western Canada. Journal of Glaciology 69(276), 665–682. doi: 10.1017/jog.2022.83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohmura, A, Bauder, A, Müller, H and Kappenberger, G (2007) Long-term change of mass balance and the role of radiation. Annals of Glaciology 46(1), 367–374. doi: 10.3189/172756407782871297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neel, S and 8 others (2019) Reanalysis of the US Geological Survey Benchmark Glaciers: long-term insight into climate forcing of glacier mass balance. Journal of Glaciology 65(253), 850–866. doi: 10.1017/jog.2019.66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Østrem, G and Brugman, MM (1991) Glacier mass-balance measurements: A manual for field and office work. 4. Saskatoon, Canada.Google Scholar
Rounce, DR and 5 others (2020) Quantifying parameter uncertainty in a large-scale glacier evolution model using Bayesian inference: application to High Mountain Asia. Journal of Glaciology 66(256), 175–187. doi: 10.1017/jog.2019.91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincent, C and 9 others (2017) Common climatic signal from glaciers in the European Alps over the last 50 years. Geophysical Research Letters 44, 1376–1383. doi: 10.1002/2016GL072094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Storch, H and Zorita, E (2019) The history of ideas of downscaling – from synoptic dynamics and spatial interpolation. Frontiers in Environmental Science 7. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2019.00021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WGMS (2021) Global Glacier Change Bulletin No. 4 (2018–2019). ISC(WDS)/IUGG(IACS)/UNEP/UNESCO/WMO, World Glacier Monitoring Service, Zurich, Switzerland (publication based on database version: doi: 10.5904/wgms-fog-2021-05CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WGMS (2022) Fluctuations of Glaciers Database. doi: 10.5904/wgms-fog-2022-09CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wouters, B, Gardner, AS and Moholdt, G (2019) Global glacier mass loss during the GRACE satellite mission (2002–2016). Frontiers of Earth Science 7. doi: 10.3389/feart.2019.00096Google Scholar
Zemp, M and 16 others (2013) Reanalysing glacier mass balance measurement series. The Cryosphere 7(4), 1227–1245. doi: 10.5194/tc-7-1227-2013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zemp, M and 38 others (2015) Historically unprecedented global glacier decline in the early 21st century. Journal of Glaciology 61(228), 745–762. doi: 10.3189/2015JoG15J017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zemp, M and 14 others (2019) Global glacier mass changes and their contributions to sea-level rise from 1961 to 2016. Nature 568(7752), 382–386. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1071-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Schematic overview of the glaciological observations available from the Fluctuations of Glaciers database (WGMS, 2022).

Figure 1

Figure 1. Representation of glaciological mass balance using sine waves (a) together with corresponding cumulative balances (b). The illustrated example is given for daily balances downscaled from Bw = 0.5 m w.e., Bs = −1.0 m w.e. and Ba = −0.5 m w.e., and for a hydrological year of 365 days with eight winter and four summer months (i.e. m = 8/12).

Figure 2

Figure 2. Model comparison between sine wave approaches (this study) and a numerical model run (Huss and others, 2015) using glaciological observations (GLAMOS, 2022) from Basòdino Glacier, Switzerland, for the hydrological years from 1991/92 to 2021/22. The results are shown as daily balances (a, b) and cumulative daily balances (c, d), with a zoom to the hydrological years 2020/21 and 2021/22 (b, d) as indicated by the grey shading.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Model comparison between sine wave approaches (this study, y-axis) and a numerical model run (Huss and others, 2015; x-axis). The results are shown as mean daily balances aggregated at daily (a), weekly (b), monthly (c) and seasonal (d) resolution as well as corresponding cumulative balances (e, f, g, h). Linear regressions between the sine wave approaches and the numerical model are shown with corresponding regression statistics (R2, RMSE). The blue line indicates the predicted values for a perfect model fit.