Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T08:58:02.346Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Immunity to Trichinella spiralis III. The longevity of the intestinal phase of the infection in mice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

D. A. Denham
D. A. Denham
Affiliation:
Central Veterinary Laboratory, New Haw, Weybridge, Surrey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It was found that with high level infections of Trichinella spiralis self-cure in immune mice occurs only slightly earlier than in normal mice. With low level infections self-cure is much earlier. In the host parasite combination studied the majority of the adult worms were found in the posterior part of the small intestine and no migration along the intestine was found. It is postulated that as migration is of such a variable occurrence it is not a necessary accompaniment to self-cure in T. spiralis infections. Where an early self-cure occurs it is obviously an important component of the immunity complex but other components such as reduced fecundity are equally important in limiting larval invasion of the muscles of immune mice.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 42 , Issue 3-4 , September 1968 , pp. 257 - 268
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brambell, M. R., 1965.—“The distribution of a primary infestation of Nippostrongylus brasiliensis in the small intestine of laboratory rats.” Parasitology, 55, 313–324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, W. C., 1967.—“Distribution of Trichinella spiralis in the small intestine of young mice.” J. Parasit., 53, 395–397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, W. C., and Cuckler, A. C., 1966.—“Further studies on the effect of thiabendazole on trichinosis in swine, with notes on the biology of the infection.” J. Parasit., 52, 260–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connan, R. M., 1966.—“Experiments with Trichostrongylus colubriformis (Giles, 1892) in the guinea-pig 1. The effect of the host response on the distribution of the parasites in the gut.” Parasitology, 56, 521–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culbertson, J. T., 1942.—“Active immunity in mice against Trichinella spiralis.” J. Parasit., 28, 197–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denham, D. A., 1966a.—“Immunity to Trichinella spiralis I. The immunity produced by mice to the first four days of the intestinal phase of the infection.” Parasitology, 56, 323–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denham, D. A., 1966b.—“Immunity to Trichinella spiralis II. Immunity produced by the adult worm in mice.” Parasitology, 56, 745–751.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gursch, O. F., 1949.—“Intestinal phase of Trichinella spiralis (Owen, 1835) Railliet, 1895.” J. Parasit., 25, 19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendricks, J. R., 1950.—“The relationship between preciptin titer and number of Trichinella spiralis in the intestinal tract of mice following test infections.” J. Immunol., 64, 173–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendricks, J. R., 1952.—“Studies in mice on the dual antibody basis of acquired resistance to Trichinella spiralis.” J. Elisha Mitchell scient. Soc., 68, 12–26.Google Scholar
Larsh, J. E., 1963.—“Experimental trichiniasis.” Advances in Parasitology, 1, 213–282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larsh, J. E., Gilchrist, H. B. and Greenberg, B. G., 1952.—“A study of the distribution and longevity of adult Trichinella spiralis in immunized and non-immunized mice.” J. Elisha Mitchell scient. Soc., 68, 1–11.Google Scholar
Larsh, J. E., and Hendricks, J. R., 1949.—“The probable explanation for the difference in the localization of adult Trichinella spiralis in young and old mice.” J. Parasit., 35, 101–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCoy, O. R., 1931.—“Immunity of rats to reinfection with Trichinella spiralis.” Am. J. Hyg., 14, 484–494.Google Scholar
McCoy, O. R., 1932.—“The course of experimental trichinosis in rats.” J. Parasit., 18, Sect. 2, p. 123.Google Scholar
McCoy, O. R., 1940.—“Rapid loss of trichnella larvae fed to immune rats and its bearing on the mechanism of immunity.” Am. J. Hyg., 32, Sect. D, 105–116.Google Scholar
Podhájecky, K., 1962.—“Localization of intestinal trichinella in the small intestines of mice in their intestinal phase.” Wiad. parazyt., 8, 633–636.Google ScholarPubMed
Rappaport, I., 1943.—“A comparision of three strains of Trichinella spiralis. II. Longevity and sex ratio of adults in the intestine and rapidity of larval development in the musculature.” Am. J. trop. Med. Hyg., 23, 351–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rappaport, I., and Wells, H. S., 1951.—“Studies in trichinosis. I. Immunity to reinfection in mice following a single light infection.” J. infect. Dis., 88, 248–253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stoll, N. R., 1929.—“Studies with the strongyloid nematode Haemonchus contortus. I. Acquired resistance of hosts under natural reinfection conditions out-of-doors.” Am. J. Hyg., 10, 384–418.Google Scholar