Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-14T20:44:47.784Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Immunohistological localisation of two hydatid antigens (antigen 5 and antigen B) in the cyst wall, brood capsules and protoscoleces of Echinococcus granulosus (ovine and equine) and E. multilocularis using immunoperoxidase methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

M. D. Rickard
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology and Applied Entomology, Imperial College, London
Caroline Davies
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology and Applied Entomology, Imperial College, London
D. T. Bout
Affiliation:
Services d' Immunologie et de Biologie Parasitaire de la Faculté de Médécin et de l'Institut Pasteur, Lille (Dir. A. R. Capron)
J. D. Smyth
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology and Applied Entomology, Imperial College, London

Abstract

Cyst wall, brood capsules and evaginated protoscoleces of E. granulosus (ovine and equine) and E. multilocularis were fixed in 10% formol-saline embedded in paraffin and cut at 8 μm. Specific rabbit antisera to antigen 5 and antigen B of hydatid cyst fluid were used with immunoperoxidase methods to localise the antigens in the histological sections.

Antigen 5 was found in all parasites and was associated with cells of the subtegumental area of the protoscolex, the brood capsule wall and the germinal membrane. The labelled antigen appeared as distinct granules in all areas. It is suggested that antigen 5 may be synthesised in all of these sites and that a source of the antigen in cyst fluid may be the germinal and brood capsule membranes. The laminated membranes of E. granulosus (ovine and equine) were, except for the superficial layers, free from antigen 5.

Antigen B was present in all parasites. It was distributed diffusely throughout the laminated membrane, germinal membrane and brood capsule wall. There were areas of densely labelled antigen B on the surface of the distal cytoplasm of the protoscolex tegument and the surface of calcareous corpuscles. The distribution of antigen B in relation to PAS positive meterial and possible complement activating substances is discussed.

The laminated membrane of E. granulosus was apparently more permeable to antigen B than to antigen 5. It is suggested that differences in the diffusion of these antigens through the laminated membranes of hydatid cysts in the same or different host species may account for variable serological responses during infection.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bout, D., Fruit, J. and Capron, A. (1974) Purification d’un antigène spécifique de liquide hydatique. Annales d’Immunologie (Institut Pasteur, Paris), 125, 775788.Google Scholar
Burns, J. (1977) Immunohistological methods and their application in the routine laboratory. Recent Advances in Pathology, 10, (in Press).Google Scholar
Capron, A., Vernes, A. and Biguet, J. (1967) Le diagnostic immunoelectrophorétique de l’hydatidose. In: Le kyste hydatique du foie (Journées Lyonnaises d’Hydatidologie), pp 2740, SIMEP ed., Lyon.Google Scholar
Coltorti, E. A. and Varela-Diaz, V. M. (1974) Echinococcus granulosus: penetration of macromolencules and their localization on the parasite membranes of cysts. Experimental Parasitology, 35, 225231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kassis, A. I. and Tanner, C. E. (1976) The role of complement in hydatid disease: In vitro studies. International Journal for Parasitology, 6, 2535.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morseth, D. (1967) The fine structure of the cyst and the protoscolex of Echinococcus granulosus. Journal of Parasitology, 53, 312325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oriol, C. and Oriol, R. (1975) Physciochemical properties of lipoprotein antigen of Echinococcus granulosus. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 24, 96100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oriol, R., Williams, J. F., Perezesandi, M. V. and Oriol, C. (1971) Purification of lipoprotein antigens of Echinococcus granulosus from sheep hydatid fluid. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 20, 569574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rickard, M. D., Mackinlay, L. M., Kane, G. J., Matossian, R. M. and Smyth, J. D. (1977) Studies on the mechanism of lysis of Echinococcus granulosus protoscoleces incubated in normal serum. Journal of Helminthology, 51, 221228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smyth, J. D. (1967) Studies on tapeworm physiology. XI. In vitro cultivation of Echinococcus granulosus from the protoscolex to the strobilate stage. Parasitology, 57, 111133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smyth, J. D. (1969) The physiology of the cestodes. Oliver and Boyd Ltd: Edinburgh and London.Google Scholar
Sternberger, L. A. (1974) Immunocytochemistry, Foundations of Immunology Series, Osler, A. G. and Weiss, L. eds, Prentice-Hall Inc., New Jersey.Google Scholar
Varela-Diaz, V. M., Lopez-Lemes, M. H., Prezioso, U., Coltorti, E. A. and Yarzabal, L. A. (1975) Evaluation of four variants of the indirect haemagglutination test for human hydatidosis. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 24, 304311.Google Scholar
Yarzabal, L. A., Bout, D. T., Naquira, F. R. and Capron, A. (1977a) Further observations on the specificity of antigen 5 of Echinococcus granulosus. Journal of Parasitology, 63, 495499.Google Scholar
Yarzabal, L. A., Dupas, H., Bout, D. and Capron, A. (1976) Echinococcus granulosus: The distribution of hydatid fluid antigens in the tissues of the larval stage. I—localization of the specific antigen of hydatid fluid (antigen 5). Experimental Parasitology, 40, 391396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yarzabal, L. A.,. Dupas, H., Bout, D., Naquira, F. and Capron, A. (1977b) Echinococcus granulosus: The distribution of hydatid fluid antigens in the tissues of the larval stage. II—localization of the thermostable lipoprotein of parasite origin (antigen B). Experimental Parasitology, 42, 115120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed