Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-13T07:32:40.883Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On inequality, growth and trust: some evidence from the lab

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2021

Marcello D'Amato ,
Niall O'Higgins  and
Marco Stimolo
Marcello D'Amato
Affiliation:
Department of Law, Università di Napoli, Suor Orsola Benincasa; CSEF, Università di Napoli Federico II, Naples, Italy Celpe, Università di Salerno, Fisciano, Italy
Niall O'Higgins
Affiliation:
Employment Policy Department, International Labour Organization (ILO), CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland Department of Economics and Statistics, Università di Salerno, 84084 Fisciano, Italy
Marco Stimolo*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Università della Campania, Luigi Vanvitelli, 81043 Capua, CE, Italy
*
*Corresponding author. Email: marco.stimolo@unicampania.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In a novel experimental design, we investigate the impact of exogenous variation in economic growth and inequality on trusting behaviour. In addition to a control with uniform endowment, three treatments were implemented where the initial endowment is exogenously changed to produce inequality and three growth scenarios where average endowments increase (boom), decrease (recession) or remain unaltered (steady state). We find that aggregate trust and trustworthiness both decrease due to the induced heterogeneity in endowments. Also, trust (but not trustworthiness) decreases (increases) due to recessions (booms). The impact of inequality on trust is greatest in a recession and absent in a boom. These aggregate effects are driven mainly by the reactions of those who, after treatment, end up at the bottom of the endowment distribution. These findings are close in sign and in the order of magnitude to those reported in observational studies on the relationship between growth, inequality and trust.

Keywords

Generalized trustgrowthinequalityrecessionC91D31D90
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Institutional Economics , Volume 18 , Issue 4 , August 2022 , pp. 621 - 636
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Millennium Economics Ltd.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akai, K. and Netzer, R. J. (2012), ‘Trust and Reciprocity among International Groups: Experimental Evidence From Austria and Japan’, The Journal of Socio-Economics, 41(2): 266–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, A. and La Ferrara, E. (2002), ‘Who Trusts Others?’, Journal of Public Economics, 85(2): 207–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Algan, Y. and Cahuc, P. (2013), ‘Trust and Growth’, Annual Review of Economics, 5(1): 521–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Algan, Y. and Cahuc, P. (2014), ‘Trust, Growth, and Well-Being: New Evidence and Policy Implications’, in P. Aghion and S. Durlauf (eds), Handbook of Economic Growth (Vol. 2). Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 49–120.Google Scholar
Ananyev, M. and Guriev, S. M. (2019), ‘Effect of Income on Trust. Evidence from the 2009 Economic Crisis in Russia’, The Economic Journal, 129(619): 1082–1118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, L. R., Mellor, J. M. and Milyo, J. (2006), ‘Induced Heterogeneity in Trust Experiments’, Experimental Economics, 9(3): 223–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andriani, L. and Sabatini, F. (2015), ‘Trust and Prosocial Behaviour in a Process of State Capacity Building: The Case of the Palestinian Territories’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 11(4): 823–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashraf, N., Bohnet, I. and Piankov, N. (2006), ‘Decomposing Trust and Trustworthiness’, Experimental Economics, 9(3): 193–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, A. and Iyer, L. (2005), ‘History, Institutions, and Economic Performance: The Legacy of Colonial Land Tenure Systems in India’, American Economic Review, 95(4): 1190–1213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banfield, E. C. and Fasano, L. (1967), The Moral Basis of a Backward Society, New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Barr, A. (2003), ‘Trust and Expected Trustworthiness: Experimental Evidence from Zimbabwean Villages’, The Economic Journal, 113(489): 614–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, J., Dickhaut, J. and McCabe, K. (1995), ‘Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History’, Games and Economic Behavior, 10(1): 122–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bigoni, M., Bortolotti, S., Casari, M., Gambetta, D. and Pancotto, F. (2016), ‘Amoral Familism, Social Capital, or Trust? The Behavioural Foundations of the Italian North–South Divide’, The Economic Journal, 126(594): 1318–1341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjørnskov, C. (2007), ‘Determinants of Generalized Trust: A Cross-Country Comparison’, Public Choice, 130(1–2): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, K. S., Mestelman, S., Moir, R. and Muller, R. A. (1999), ‘Heterogeneity and the Voluntary Provision of Public Goods’, Experimental Economics, 2(1): 5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, H.-J. (2011), ‘Institutions and Economic Development: Theory, Policy and History’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 7(4): 473–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charness, G. and Gneezy, U. (2008), ‘What's in a Name? Anonymity and Social Distance in Dictator and Ultimatum Games’, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 68(1): 29–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charness, G., Gneezy, U. and Kuhn, M. A. (2012), ‘Experimental Methods: Between-Subject and Within-Subject Design’, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 81(1): 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudhuri, A. and Gangadharan, L. (2007), ‘An Experimental Analysis of Trust and Trustworthiness’, Southern Economic Journal, 73(4): 959–985.Google Scholar
Costa, D. L. and Kahn, M. E. (2003), ‘Civic Engagement and Community Heterogeneity: An Economist's Perspective’, Perspectives on Politics, 1(1): 103–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, J. C. (2009), ‘Trust and Reciprocity: Implications of Game Triads and Social Contexts’, New Zealand Economic Papers, 43(2): 89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, J. C. (2010), ‘Some Issues of Methods, Theories, and Experimental Designs’, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 73(1): 24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniele, G. and Geys, B. (2015), ‘Interpersonal Trust and Welfare State Support’, European Journal of Political Economy, 39(1): 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deaton, A. (2016), ‘Measuring and Understanding Behavior, Welfare, and Poverty’, American Economic Review, 106(6): 1221–1243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deck, C. (2009), ‘An Experimental Analysis of Cooperation and Productivity in the Trust Game’, Experimental Economics, 12(1): 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dincer, O. C. and Uslaner, E. M. (2010), ‘Trust and Growth’, Public Choice, 142(1–2): 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischbacher, U. (2007), ‘z-Tree: Zurich Toolbox for Ready-Made Economic Experiments’, Experimental Economics, 10(2): 171–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gächter, S., Herrmann, B. and Thöni, C. (2004), ‘Trust, Voluntary Cooperation, and Socio-Economic Background: Survey and Experimental Evidence’, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 55(4): 505–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gächter, S., Mengel, F., Tsakas, E. and Vostroknutov, A. (2017), ‘Growth and Inequality in Public Good Provision’, Journal of Public Economics, 150(1): 1–13.Google Scholar
Gallego, A. (2016), ‘Inequality and the Erosion of Trust among the Poor: Experimental Evidence’, Socio-Economic Review, 14(3): 443–460.Google Scholar
Glanville, J. L. and Paxton, P. (2007), ‘How Do We Learn to Trust? A Confirmatory Tetrad Analysis of the Sources of Generalized Trust’, Social Psychology Quarterly, 70(3): 230–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graafland, J. (2020), ‘Contingencies in the Relationship Between Economic Freedom and Human Development: The Role of Generalized Trust’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 16(3): 271–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greiner, B., Ockenfels, A. and Werner, P. (2012), ‘The Dynamic Interplay of Inequality and Trust. An Experimental Study’, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 81(2): 355–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guiso, L., Herrera, H. and Morelli, M. (2017), ‘Demand and supply of populism’, CEPR Discussion Paper, no. DP11871.Google Scholar
Guiso, L., Sapienza, P. and Zingales, L. (2009), ‘Cultural Biases in Economic Exchange?’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(3): 1095–1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guiso, L., Sapienza, P. and Zingales, L. (2016), ‘Long-Term Persistence’, Journal of the European Economic Association, 14(6): 1401–1436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, R. (2002). Trust and Trustworthiness, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Hargreaves, H., Shaun, P. H., Tan, J. H. and Zizzo, D. J. (2013), ‘Trust, Inequality and the Market’, Theory and Decision, 74(3): 311–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holm, H. J. and Danielson, A. (2005), ‘Tropic Trust Versus Nordic Trust: Experimental Evidence from Tanzania and Sweden’, The Economic Journal, 115(503): 505–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houser, D. and Xiao, E. (2015), ‘House Money Effects on Trust and Reciprocity’, Public Choice, 163(1–2): 187–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Labour Organisation (ILO) (2020), ILO Monitor: COVID-19 and the World of Work (4th Edn.), Geneva: May.Google Scholar
Jenkins, S. P., Brandolini, A., Micklewright, J. and Nolan, B. (eds) (2013), The Great Recession and the Distribution of Household Income, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Johnson, N. D. and Mislin, A. A. (2011), ‘Trust Games: A Meta-Analysis’, Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(5): 865–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knack, S. and Keefer, P. (1997), ‘Does Social Capital Have an Economic Payoff? A Cross-Country Investigation’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4): 1251–1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuznets, S. (1973), ‘Modern Economic Growth: Findings and Reflections’, The American Economic Review, 63(3): 247–258.Google Scholar
Kyriacou, A. P. and Velásquez, F. J. L. (2015), ‘Inequality and Culture in a Cross-Section of Countries’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 11(1): 141–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
List, J. A., Sadoff, S. and Wagner, M. (2011), ‘So You Want to Run an Experiment, Now What? Some Simple Rules of Thumb for Optimal Experimental Design’, Experimental Economics, 14(4): 439–457.Google Scholar
McCannon, B. C. and Peterson, J. H. (2013), ‘Trust, Reciprocity, and a Preference for Economic Freedom: Experimental Evidence’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 10(3): 451–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miguel, E., Paul, G. and Levine, D. I. (2006), ‘Does Industrialization Build or Destroy Social Networks?’, Economic Development and Institutional Change, 54(2): 287–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nannestad, P. (2008), ‘What Have we Learned About Generalized Trust if Anything?’, Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1): 413–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, R. (2000), Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Sadrieh, A. and Verbon, H. A. (2006), ‘Inequality, Cooperation, and Growth: An Experimental Study’, European Economic Review, 50(5): 1197–1222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapienza, P., Toldra-Simats, A. and Zingales, L. (2013), ‘Understanding Trust’, The Economic Journal, 123(573): 1313–1332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabellini, G. (2008), ‘The Scope of Cooperation: Values and Incentives’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(3): 905–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uslaner, E. M. and Conley, R. S. (2003), ‘Civic Engagement and Particularized Trust: The Ties That Bind People to Their Ethnic Communities’, American Politics Research, 31(4): 331–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, E. and Bicchieri, C. (2010), ‘When Equality Trumps Reciprocity’, Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(3): 456–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamagishi, T. and Yamagishi, M. (1994), ‘Trust and Commitment in the United States and Japan’, Motivation and Emotion, 18(2): 129–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zak, P. J. and Knack, S. (2001), ‘Trust and Growth’, The Economic Journal, 111(470): 295–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

D'Amato et al. supplementary material

Online Apendix

Download D'Amato et al. supplementary material(File)
File 246.2 KB