Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-06T19:05:46.463Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cocaine screening in patients undergoing nasal reconstructive surgery: a cross-sectional, survey-based study of UK rhinology consultants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2023

H Raja Open the ORCID record for H Raja [Opens in a new window] ,
K Lai Open the ORCID record for K Lai [Opens in a new window]  and
V Sunkaraneni
H Raja*
Affiliation:
ENT Department, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
K Lai
Affiliation:
ENT Department, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, UK
V Sunkaraneni
Affiliation:
ENT Department, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK
*
Corresponding author: H Raja; Email: haseemraja@hotmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to explore the current practices of the UK rhinology consultant body in regard to cocaine screening in nasal reconstructive surgery.

Method

A 12-question online survey was distributed to rhinology consultants (October 2021 to February 2022) currently practising in the UK.

Results

A total of 55 consultants responded. Fifty-three per cent asked patients about cocaine use prior to consideration of surgery, and 45 per cent performed cocaine testing prior to consideration of surgery. Of these, the majority employed urine testing alone (60 per cent), with hair testing being less common as a single screening modality (4 per cent). Sixteen per cent opted for both urine and hair testing. The most common reasons for not performing cocaine testing included patient history or clinical examination that was not suggestive of cocaine use (44 per cent), lack of formal guidelines (33 per cent) and lack of testing availability (27 per cent). Sixty-four per cent were in favour of a national policy for cocaine screening.

Conclusion

There is marked variation in cocaine screening practices for nasal reconstructive surgery among UK rhinologists.

Keywords

Rhinologycocainenasal reconstructiondrug screeningsubstance abuse
Type
Main Article
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 137 , Issue 10 , October 2023 , pp. 1149 - 1153
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Mr H Raja takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

Nitro, L, Pipolo, C, Fadda, GL, Allevi, F, Borgione, M, Cavallo, G et al. Distribution of cocaine-induced midline destructive lesions: systematic review and classification. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2022;279:3257–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, JC, Kacker, A, Anand, VK. Midline nasal and hard palate destruction in cocaine abusers and cocaine's role in rhinologic practice. Ear Nose Throat J 2002;81:172–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
George, TC, Freet, DJ, Cross, JM, Huzar, TF. Levamisole-induced vasculitis. JAAPA 2019;32:23–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rathnayake, D, Clarke, M, Jayasinghe, V. Patient prioritisation methods to shorten waiting times for elective surgery: a systematic review of how to improve access to surgery. PLoS One 2021;16:e0256578CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caulley, L, Takhar, A, Bast, F et al. Non-disclosure of cocaine use in the rhinology practice: a retrospective study of 27 patients. Clin Otolaryngol 2020;45:608–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Office for National Statistics. Drug misuse in England and Wales: year ending March 2020. In: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/articles/drugmisuseinenglandandwales/yearendingmarch2020 [22 August 2022]Google Scholar
Harper, SJ, Jones, NS. Cocaine: what role does it have in current ENT practice? A review of the current literature. J Laryngol Otol 2006;120:808–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, A, Joshi, A, D'Souza, A. Care of the cocaine user with nasal deformity. Fac Plast Surg 2017;33:411–18Google ScholarPubMed
Guyuron, B, Afrooz, PN. Correction of cocaine-related nasal defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;121:1015–23CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slavin, SA, Goldwyn, RM. The cocaine user: the potential problem patient for rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990;86:436–42CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bloom, JD, Kaplan, SE, Bleier, BS, Goldstein, SA. Septoplasty complications: avoidance and management. Otolaryngologic Clin North Am 2009;42:463–81CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moeller, KE, Kissack, JC, Atayee, RS, Lee, KC. Clinical interpretation of urine drug tests: what clinicians need to know about urine drug screens. InMayo Clin Proc 2017;92:774–96CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verstraete, AG. Detection times of drugs of abuse in blood, urine, and oral fluid. Therapeutic Drug Monitor 2004;26:200–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrison, R, Fu, S. A review of methodology for testing hair for cocaine. J Forens Invest 2014;2:1–7Google Scholar
Boumba, VA, Ziavrou, KS, Vougiouklakis, T. Hair as a biological indicator of drug use, drug abuse or chronic exposure to environmental toxicants. Int J Toxicol 2006;25:143–63CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DuPont, RL, Baumgartner, WA. Drug testing by urine and hair analysis: complementary features and scientific issues. Forens Sci Int 1995;70:63–76CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed