Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-31T13:25:54.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Learning needs of junior doctors in otolaryngology: a qualitative study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 January 2024

Simon Morris Open the ORCID record for Simon Morris [Opens in a new window] ,
David Owens  and
Dorottya Cserzo
Simon Morris*
Affiliation:
Department of ENT, Glangwili General Hospital, Carmarthen, Wales, UK
David Owens
Affiliation:
Department of ENT, University Hospital Wales, Cardiff, Wales, UK
Dorottya Cserzo
Affiliation:
School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK
*
Corresponding author: Simon Morris; Email: s.morris@doctors.org.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives

There is concern that junior doctors are not prepared for their post-graduate attachments in ENT. The aims of this study were to capture the learning priorities of those in the ENT first on-call role and facilitate further educational opportunities to address these needs.

Method

Semi-structured interviews were undertaken to explore the learning needs of junior doctors with seven junior and two senior ENT clinicians.

Results

The thematic analysis generated three themes: the role of the ENT Junior; the perceived, expressed and prescribed learning needs; and attitudes towards future learning. These themes explored the misalignment between undergraduate training and post-graduate expectations, the lack of competence in ENT practical skills and the need for focused ENT training prior to commencing on-call shifts.

Conclusion

All interviewees identified the need for greater experience in practical interventional skills prior to their ENT attachments and expressed interest towards a standardised, bootcamp-style induction with simulated emergency experience.

Keywords

Needs assessmentotolaryngologylearningmotivationmedical education
Type
Main Article
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 138 , Issue 6 , June 2024 , pp. 592 - 600
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Simon Morris takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

Presented at the ENT Wales Academic Meeting, 21 October 2022, Saundersfoot, Wales, UK

References

Ferguson, GR, Bacila, IA, Swamy, M. Does current provision of undergraduate education prepare UK medical students in ENT? A systematic literature review. BMJ Open 2016;6:e010054CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khan, MM, Saeed, SR. Provision of undergraduate otorhinolaryngology teaching within General Medical Council approved UK medical schools: what is current practice? J Laryngol Otol 2012;126:340–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Powell, J, Cooles, FAH, Carrie, S, Paleri, V. Is undergraduate medical education working for ENT surgery? A survey of UK medical school graduates. J Laryngol Otol 2011;125:896–905CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biswas, D, Rafferty, A, Jassar, P. Night emergency cover for ENT in England: a national survey. J Laryngol Otol 2009;123:899–902CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swords, C, Smith, ME, Wasson, JD, Qayyum, A, Tysome, JR. Validation of a new ENT emergencies course for first-on-call doctors. J Laryngol Otol 2017;13:106–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witheridge, A, Ferns, G, Scott-Smith, W. Revisiting Miller's pyramid in medical education: the gap between traditional assessment and diagnostic reasoning. Int J Med Educ 2019;25:191–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, AW, Smith, KA, Carrie, S. A survey of ENT undergraduate teaching in the UK. J Laryngol Otol 2020;134:553–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pabla, L, Jindal, M, Latif, K. The management of otitis externa in UK general practice. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2011;269:753–610.1007/s00405-011-1687-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darr, A, Dhanji, K, Doshi, J. Tracheostomy and laryngectomy survey: do front-line emergency staff appreciate the difference? J Laryngol Otol 2012;126:605–810.1017/S0022215112000618CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, EJ, Moreton, A. Safety during night shifts: a cross-sectional survey of junior doctors’ preparation and practice. BMJ Open 2013;3:e003567CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stufflebeam, DL. The CIPP Model for Evaluation. In: Kellaghan, T, Stufflebeam, DL, eds. International Handbook of Educational Evaluation. Dordrecht: Springer, 2003;31–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knowles, MS. The Modern Practice of Adult Education: From Pedagogy to Andragogy. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1980Google Scholar
Ratnapalan, S, Hilliard, RI. Needs assessment in postgraduate medical education: a review. Med Educ Online 2002;7:454210.3402/meo.v7i.4542CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhalla, S, O'Byrne, L, Beegun, I, Amos, D, Jones, J, Awad, Z et al. ‘No drain, no gain’: validation of novel quinsy simulation model. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol 2020;196:81–7Google Scholar
Smith, ME, Trinidade, A, Tysome, JR. The ENT boot camp: an effective training method for ENT induction. Clin Otolaryngol 2016;41:421–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, DBT, Hopkins, L, Brown, C, Bowman, C, Abdelraahman, T, Iorwerth, A et al. From core to higher surgical training: influence of surgical education contracts and induction boost. Bull Roy Coll Surg Engl 2020;102:328–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patel, ST, Shah, S, Sood, RP, Siddiqui, Z, McKay-Davies, I. The implementation of virtual clinical skills teaching in improving procedural confidence in ENT trainees. Adv Med Educ Pract 2021;27:965–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chow, A, Chen, S, Rosby, L, Low-Beer, N, Shelat, VG, Cleland, J et al. Student assistantship programme: an evaluation of impact on readiness to transit from medical student to junior doctor. BMC Med Educ 2022;22:99CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubin, HJ, Rubin, IS. Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data. In: The Responsive Interview as an Extended Conversation, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, 2011;108–28Google Scholar
Braun, V, Clarke, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006;3:77–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, S. So you want to be an ENT surgeon. BMJ 2007;334:s205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, JR, Mungroo, R, Ahmad, Y, Wang, M, De Rossi, S, Horsley, T. Toward a definition of competency-based education in medicine: a systematic review of published definitions. Med Teach 2010;32:631–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ker, J, Bradley, P. Simulation in medical education. In: Understanding Medical Education, 2nd edn. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013;151–62Google Scholar
Ten Cate, O, Durning, S. Peer teaching in medical education: twelve reasons to move from theory to practice. Med Teach 2007;29:591–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
General Medical Council. Effective departmental inductions for doctors in training. In: https://www.gmc-uk.org/education/hidden-documents/sharing-good-practice/effective-departmental-inductions-for-doctors-in-training [15 May 2022]Google Scholar
General Medical Council. Understanding the nature and scale of the issues associated with doctors’ induction. In: https://www.gmc-uk.org/about/what-we-do-and-why/data-and-research/research-and-insight-archive/understanding-the-nature-and-scale-of-the-issues-associated-with-doctors-induction [15 May 2022]Google Scholar
Whallett, A. Improving trust induction for junior doctors. BMJ 2006;333:s106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, C, Egan, R, Ansell, J, Abdelrahman, T, Harries, T, Bowman, C et al. Core surgical training in Wales: pilot study of a multidisciplinary surgical boot camp. Bull Roy Coll Surg Engl 2018;100:184–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackmore, C, Austin, J, Lopushinsky, SR, Donnon, T. Effects of postgraduate medical education ‘boot camps’ on clinical skills, knowledge, and confidence: a meta-analysis. J Grad Med Educ 2014;6;643–52CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhalla, S, Tolley, N, Awad, Z. Creating a validated simulation training curriculum in otolaryngology. Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep 2020;8;96–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhalla, S, Beegun, I, Awad, Z, Tolley, N. Simulation-based ENT induction: validation of a novel mannequin training model. J Laryngol Otol 2020;134:74–80CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gao, RW, Rooney, D, Harvey, R, Malloy, KM, Van Koevering, KK. To pack a nose: high-fidelity epistaxis simulation using 3D printing technology. Laryngoscope 2022;132:747–5310.1002/lary.29757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dermody, SM, Masciello, M, Malekzadeh, S. A multispecialty critical airway simulation course for medical students. Laryngoscope 2021;131:1482–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lloyd, S, Tan, ZE, Taube, MA, Doshi, J. Development of an ENT undergraduate curriculum using a Delphi survey. Clin Otolaryngol 2014;39:281–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doshi, J, McDonald, J. Determining the content of an educational ENT website using the Delphi technique. J Laryngol Otol 2012;126:402–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rieber, RW, Carton, AS. Thinking and speech. In: The Collected Works of L.S. Vygotsky. New York: Springer, 1987;37–285Google Scholar
Piaget, J. The Language and Thought of the Child. Oxford: Harcourt, Brace, 1926Google Scholar
Yu, TC, Wilson, NC, Singh, PP, Lemanu, DP, Hawken, S, Hill, A. Medical students-as-teachers: a systematic review of peer-assisted teaching during medical school. Adv Med Educ Pract 2011;23:157–72Google Scholar
Royal College of Surgeons. Improving surgical training. In: https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/careers-in-surgery/trainees/ist/ [12 April 2022]Google Scholar
General Medical Council. Medical licensing assessment. In: https://www.gmc-uk.org/education/medical-licensing-assessment [10 June 2022]Google Scholar