Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-11T23:35:32.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Considering Quality of Life while Repudiating Disability Injustice: A Pathways Approach to Setting Priorities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Govind Persad
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article proposes a novel strategy, one that draws on insights from antidiscrimination law, for addressing a persistent challenge in medical ethics and the philosophy of disability: whether health systems can consider quality of life without unjustly discriminating against individuals with disabilities. It argues that rather than uniformly considering or ignoring quality of life, health systems should take a more nuanced approach. Under the article's proposal, health systems should treat cases where (1) quality of life suffers because of disability-focused exclusion or injustice differently from cases where (2) lower quality of life results from laws of nature, resource scarcity, or appropriate tradeoffs. Decisionmakers should ignore quality-of-life losses that result from injustice or exclusion when ignoring them would improve the prospects of individuals with disabilities; in contrast, they should consider quality-of-life losses that are unavoidable or stem from resource scarcity or permissible tradeoffs. On this proposal, while health systems should not amplify existing injustice against individuals with disabilities, they are not required to altogether ignore the potential effects of disability on quality of life.

Type
Independent Articles
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 47 , Issue 2: Human Subject Protection , Summer 2019 , pp. 294 - 303
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

John, T.M., Millum, J., and Wasserman, D., “How to Allocate Scarce Health Resources Without Discriminating Against People with Disabilities,” Economics and Philosophy 33, no. 2 (2017): 161-184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckstead, N. and Ord, T., “Bubbles Under the Wallpaper: Healthcare Rationing and Discrimination,” in Bioethics: An Anthology, ed. Kühse, H., Schüklenk, U., and Singer, P. (West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 2016): 406.Google Scholar
Kerstein, S., “Dignity, Disability, and Lifespan,” Journal of Applied Philosophy 34, no. 5 (2017): 635; G. Persad, A. Wertheimer, and E.J. Emanuel, “Standing by Our Principles: Meaningful Guidance, Moral Foundations, and Multi-Principle Methodology in Medical Scarcity,” American Journal of Bioethics 10, no. 4 (2010): 46-47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menzel, P., “How Should what Economists Call ‘Social Values’ Be Measured?” The Journal of Ethics 3, no. 3 (1999): 250-263.Google Scholar
Chernew, M.E., Rosen, A.B., and Fendrick, A.M., “Value-Based Insurance Design,” Health Affairs 26, no. 2 (2007): w195-w203; S.D. Sullivan et al., “Design, Implementation, and First-Year Outcomes of a Value-Based Drug Formulary,” Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy 21, no. 4 (2015): 269-275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Symons, A.B., McGuigan, D., and Akl, E.A., “A Curriculum to Teach Medical Students to Care for People with Disabilities: Development and Initial Implementation,” BMC Medical Education 9, no. 1 (2009): 78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fair Housing Council of San Fernando Valley v. Roommate. com, LLC, 2012. 666 F.3d 1216, 1221 (9th Cir.).Google Scholar
Emens, E.F., “Intimate Discrimination: The State's Role in the Accidents of Sex and Love,” Harvard Law Review 122, no. 1307 (2009): 1340, 1356, 1374-1377; L. Halldenius, “Dissecting ‘Discrimination,’” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 14, no. 4 (2005): 456.Google Scholar
Dua, P., Heiland, M.F., Kracen, A.C., and Deshields, T.L., “Cancer Related Hair Loss: A Selective Review of the Alopecia Research Literature,” Psycho-Oncology 26, no. 4 (2017): 438; A. Lateef and S. Marshall-Lucette, “Living with Trimethylaminuria (TMAU) from an Adult Viewpoint,” Practice Nursing 28, no. 8 (2017): 344-351; See Emens, supra note 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Emens, supra note 8.Google Scholar
Palmore v. Sidoti, 1984. 466 U.S. 429, 433-34; Stein, M.A., “Mommy has a Blue Wheelchair: Recognizing the Parental Rights of Individuals with Disabilities,” Brooklyn Law Review 60, no. 3 (1994): 1097.Google Scholar
Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena, 1995. 515 U.S. 200, 237.Google Scholar
Strauss, D.A., “Discriminatory Intent and the Taming of Brown,” University of Chicago Law Review 56, no. 3 (1989): 982–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrecker, T., “Denaturalizing Scarcity: A Strategy of Enquiry for Public-Health Ethics,” Bulletin of the World Health Organization 86 (2008): 600, 603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persad, G.C. and Emanuel, E.J., “Dilemmas in Access to Medicines: A Humanitarian Perspective — Authors' Reply,” The Lancet 389, no. 10073 (2017): 1008.Google Scholar
Barnes, E., The Minority Body (New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Barnes, supra note 16, 27.Google Scholar
See Barnes, supra note 16.Google Scholar
See Barnes, supra note 16, 102.Google Scholar
Solberg, C.T. and Gamlund, E., “The Badness of Death and Priorities in Health,” BMC Medical Ethics 17, no. 1 (2016): 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippert-Rasmussen, K., “Two Puzzles for Deontologists: Life-Prolonging Killings and the Moral Symmetry Between Killing and Causing a Person to be Unconscious,” The Journal of Ethics 5, no. 4 (2001): 385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Barnes, supra note 16, 4.Google Scholar
See Barnes, supra note 16, 95-96.Google Scholar
See Barnes, supra note 16, 102.Google Scholar
See Barnes, supra note 16, 3.Google Scholar
See Barnes, supra note 16.Google Scholar
Campbell, S.M. and Stramondo, J.A., “Review of The Minority Body, by Elizabeth Barnes,” Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, November 2016, available at <https://ndpr.nd.edu/news/the-minority-body-a-theory-of-disability/> (last visited April 5, 2019).Google Scholar
See Barnes, supra note 16, 115.Google Scholar
Campbell, S.M. and Stramondo, J.A., “The Complicated Relationship of Disability and Well-Being,” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 27, no. 2 (2017): 157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, J.B. and Vanderheiden, G.C., “Modality-Independent Interaction Framework for Cross-Disability Accessibility,” in Cross-Cultural Design: Methods, Practice, and Case Studies, ed. Rau, P.L. Patrick (Beijing, China: Tsinghua University, 2013): 218-222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olmstead v. L.C. 1999. 527 U.S. 581, 597.Google Scholar
Bagenstos, S.R.. “Disability Rights and Labor: Is This Conflict Really Necessary?” Indiana Law Journal 92, no. 277 (2016): 285-287.Google Scholar
See John et al., supra note 1, 17.Google Scholar
Weisbach, D.A., “Toward a New Approach to Disability Law,” University of Chicago Legal Forum 1, no. 47 (2009): 68-69.Google Scholar
Samaha, A.M., “What Good is the Social Model of Disability?” University of Chicago Law Review 74, no. 4 (2007): 1275-1306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Samaha, supra note 35.Google Scholar
Emens, E.F., “Integrating Accommodation,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 156 (2008): 839, 842.Google Scholar
Cohen, G.A., Rescuing Justice and Equality (Cambridge, UK: Harvard University Press, 2008): 154-155, 165-166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See John et al., supra note 1, 18.Google Scholar
See John et al., supra note 1, 21.Google Scholar
Zwerling, A., Dowdy, D., Von Delft, A., Taylor, H., and Merritt, M.W., “Incorporating Social Justice and Stigma in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis Treatment,” International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease 21, no. 1 (2017): S71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esposito, L. and Hassoun, N., “Measuring Health Burden Without Discriminating Against the Disabled,” Journal of Public Health 39, no. 3 (2016): 635-636.Google Scholar
See Esposito et al., supra note 42.Google Scholar
See Esposito et al., supra note 42.Google Scholar
See Menzel, supra note 4.Google Scholar
Verguet, S., Laxminarayan, R., and Jamison, D.T., “Universal Public Finance of Tuberculosis Treatment in India: An Extended Cost-Effectiveness Analysis,” Health Economics 24, no. 3 (2015): 318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, H.F., “A Liberal Theory of Social Welfare: Fairness, Utility, and the Pareto Principle,” Yale Law Journal 110, no. 2 (2000): 215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar