Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-19T17:01:54.325Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Impact of Dobbs on US Graduate Medical Education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2023

Amirala S. Pasha
Affiliation:
MAYO CLINIC, ROCHESTER, MN, USA.
Daniel Breitkopf
Affiliation:
MAYO CLINIC, ROCHESTER, MN, USA.
Gretchen Glaser
Affiliation:
MAYO CLINIC, ROCHESTER, MN, USA.

Abstract

The Dobbs decision will directly affect patients and reproductive rights; it will also impact patients indirectly in many ways, one of which will be changes in the physician workforce through its impact on graduate medical education. Current residency accreditation standards require training in all forms of contraception in addition to training in the provision of abortion. State bans on abortions may diminish access to training as approximately half of obstetrics and gynecology residency programs are in states with significant abortion restrictions. The Dobbs decision creates numerous hurdles for trainees and their programs. Trainees in restrictive states will have to travel to learn in a different program in a protective state. As training opportunities diminish, potentially leading to a decline in clinical skills, knowledge, and experience in the provision of abortion, the rate of complications and maternal mortality are likely to rise. This will likely have a disproportionately negative effect on preexisting disparities in reproductive health fueled by a longstanding history of systemic racism and inequities. This work aims to both define the looming problem in abortion training created by Dobbs and propose solutions to ensure that an adequate workforce is available in the future to serve patient needs.

Type
Symposium Articles
Copyright
© 2023 The Author(s)

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Guttmacher Institute, Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe, available at <https://states.guttmacher.org/policies/> (last visited October 15, 2022).+(last+visited+October+15,+2022).>Google Scholar
American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM), State Abortion Trigger Laws, July 1, 2022, available at <https://www.asrm.org/globalassets/_asrm/advocacy-and-policy/dobbs/cpl-report_impact-of-state-trigger-laws-on-reproductive-medicine_final.pdf> (last visited Sept. 19, 2023).+(last+visited+Sept.+19,+2023).>Google Scholar
Okla. Stat. tit. 63, § 1-745.31.Google Scholar
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), ACGME Program Requirements for Graduate Medical Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology, September 17, 2022, available at <https://www.acgme.org/globalassets/pfassets/programrequirements/220_obstetricsandgynecology_9-17-2022.pdfÿÿP8> (last visited August 4, 2023).+(last+visited+August+4,+2023).>Google Scholar
Vinekar, K. et al., “Projected Implications of Overturning Roe v Wade on Abortion Training in U.S. Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Programs,” Obstetrics and Gynecology 140, no. 2 (2022): 146149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gyuras, H. J. et al., “The Double-Edged Sword of Abortion Regulations: Decreasing Training Opportunities While Increasing Knowledge Requirements,” Medical Education Online 28, no. 1 (2023): 110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
See Guttmacher Institute, supra note 1.Google Scholar
W. Va. Code § 61-2-8 (2022); La. Stat. Ann. § 40:1061 (2022).Google Scholar
See Guttmacher Institute, supra note 1.Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins. “ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 193: Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy,” Obstetrics and Gynecology 131, no. 3 (2018): e91e103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-6901 (2022).Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (2021); “Multifetal Gestations: Twin, Triplet, and Higher-Order Multifetal Pregnancies: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 231,” Obstetrics and Gynecology 137, no. 6 (2021): e145–e162.Google Scholar
Rao, R., “Selective Reduction: ‘A Soft Cover for Hard Choices’ or Another Name for Abortion?Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 43, no. 2 (2015): 196205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Program, Ryan, The Ryan Residency Training Program, available at <https://ryanprogram.org/> (last visited October 27, 2022).+(last+visited+October+27,+2022).>Google Scholar
Society of Gynecologic Surgeons (SGS), Society of Gynecologic Surgeons (SGS), available at <https://www.sgsonline.org/> (last visited October 27, 2022).+(last+visited+October+27,+2022).>Google Scholar
See Guttmacher Institute, supra note 1.Google Scholar
See ACGME, supra note 4.Google Scholar
American Board of Obstetrics & Gynecology (ABOG), Bulletins & Dates, available at <https://www.abog.org/bulletins-dates> (last visited October 15, 2022).+(last+visited+October+15,+2022).>Google Scholar
American Board of Obstetrics & Gynecology (ABOG), ABOG Reiterates Support for OB GYNs and Reproductive Health Rights, available at <https://www.abog.org/about-abog/news-announcements/2022/06/24/abog-reiterates-support-for-ob-gyns-and-reproductive-health-rights> (last visited February 10, 2023).+(last+visited+February+10,+2023).>Google Scholar
American Board of Obstetrics & Gynecology (ABOG), Complex Family Planning FAQs, available at <https://www.abog.org/about-abog/faqs/complex-family-planning-faqs> (last visited October 15, 2022); See ACGME, supra note 4.+(last+visited+October+15,+2022);+See+ACGME,+supra+note+4.>Google Scholar
Rowland, C., “A Challenge for Antiabortion States: Doctors Reluctant to Work There,” Washington Post, August 6, 2022.Google Scholar
American Association of Medical Colleges (AAMC), How the Repeal of Roe v. Wade Will Affect Training in Abortion and Reproductive Health, available at <https://www.aamc.org/news-insights/how-repeal-roe-v-wade-will-affect-training-abortion-and-reproductive-health> (last visited February 10, 2023).+(last+visited+February+10,+2023).>Google Scholar
Horvath, S. et al., “Resident Abortion Care Training and Satisfaction: Results from the 2020 Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology in-Training Examination Survey,” Obstetrics and Gynecology 138, no. 3 (2021): 472474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health. Barriers to Abortion Training Persist in Ob-Gyn Residency Programs, available at <https://bixbycenter.ucsf.edu/news/barriers-abortion-training-persist-ob-gyn-residency-programs> (last visited February 10, 2023).+(last+visited+February+10,+2023).>Google Scholar
See Vinekar, supra note 5.Google Scholar
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), ACGME Program Requirements for Graduate Medical Education in Family Medicine, June 12, 2022, available at <https://www.acgme.org/globalassets/pfassets/programrequirements/120_familymedicine_2022.pdf> (last visited October 7, 2022).+(last+visited+October+7,+2022).>Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Abortion Surveillance — United States, 2019, available at <https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/ss/ss7009a1.htm> (last visited October 7, 2022).+(last+visited+October+7,+2022).>Google Scholar
Stone, M. L., Gordon, M., and Rovinsky, J., “3. The Impact of a Liberalized Abortion Law on the Medical Schools,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 111, no. 5 (1971): 728735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Association of Medical Colleges (AAMC), ERAS Statistics, available at <https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/interactive-data/eras-statistics-data> (last visited October 27, 2022).+(last+visited+October+27,+2022).>Google Scholar
Pollard, J., “Abortion Access Looms Over Medical Residency Applications,” Associated Press (AP) News, October 19, 2022, available at <https://apnews.com/article/abortion-health-business-education-family-medicine-3fbeef4338fbdcaf48f4f133055c9f78> (last visited October 27, 2022).+(last+visited+October+27,+2022).>Google Scholar
See Guttmacher Institute, supra note 1.Google Scholar
Stonehocker, J., Muruthi, J., and Rayburn, W. F., “Is There a Shortage of Obstetrician-Gynecologists? Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America 44, no. 1 (2017): 121132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), “Projections of Supply and Demand for Women’s Health Service Providers: 2018-2030,” March 2021, available at <https://bhw.hrsa.gov/sites/default/files/bureau-health-workforce/data-research/projections-supply-demand-2018-2030.pdf> (last visited August 8, 2023).+(last+visited+August+8,+2023).>Google Scholar
Daniel, S., Schulkin, J., and Grossman, D., “Abortion Referral Practices among a National Sample of Obstetrician-Gynecologists,” Women’s Health Issues: Official Publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women’s Health 30, no. 6 (2020): 446452.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
See Gyuras, supra note 6.Google Scholar
Stevenson, A. J., “The Pregnancy-Related Mortality Impact of a Total Abortion Ban in the United States: A Research Note on Increased Deaths Due to Remaining Pregnant,” Demography 58, no. 6 (2021): 20192028; K. B. Kozhimannil, A. Hassan, and R. R. Hardeman, “Abortion Access as a Racial Justice Issue,” The New England Journal of Medicine 387, no. 17 (2022): 1537–1539.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), Common Program Requirements, available at <https://www.acgme.org/What-We-Do/Accreditation/Common-Program-Requirements/> (last visited February 10, 2023).+(last+visited+February+10,+2023).>Google Scholar
Storey, A. et al., “First-Trimester Abortion Complications: Simulation Cases for OB/GYN Residents in Sepsis and Hemorrhage,” MedEdPORTAL: The Journal of Teaching and Learning Resources 16 (2020): 10995; L. M. Goldthwaite and K. Tocce, “Simulation Training for Family Planning Procedures,” Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology 29, no. 6 (2017): 437–442; M. Paul and K. Nobel, “Papaya: a Simulation Model for Training in Uterine Aspiration,” Family Medicine 37, no. 4 (2005): 242-244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chaudhry, H. J., “Expanding Licensure Portability and Access To Care: Lessons Learned During COVID-19,” Health Affairs (Project Hope) 41, no. 8 (2022): 11361138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Center for Medical and Medicaid Services (CMS), COVID-19 Emergency Declaration Blanket Waivers for Health Care Providers, May 24, 2021, available at <https://www.cms.gov/files/document/summary-covid-19-emergency-declaration-waivers.pdf> (last visited October 27, 2022); Center for Medical and Medicaid Services (CMS), Physicians and Other Clinicians: CMS Flexibilities to Fight COVID-19, August 18, 2022, available at <https://www.cms.gov/files/document/physicians-and-other-clinicians-cms-flexibilities-fight-covid-19.pdf> (last visited October 27, 2022).+(last+visited+October+27,+2022);+Center+for+Medical+and+Medicaid+Services+(CMS),+Physicians+and+Other+Clinicians:+CMS+Flexibilities+to+Fight+COVID-19,+August+18,+2022,+available+at++(last+visited+October+27,+2022).>Google Scholar
M. Messerly and A. M. Ollstein, “Abortion Bans and Penalties Would Vary Widely by State,” POLITICO, available at <https://www.politico.com/news/2022/05/06/potential-abortion-bans-and-penalties-by-state-00030572> (last visited October 27, 2022).+(last+visited+October+27,+2022).>Google Scholar
Exec. Order No. 14076, 87 FR 42053 (2022).Google Scholar
See Guttmacher Institute, supra note 1.Google Scholar
K. Watson, “Biden Signs Executive Order to Support Travel for Abortions in Latest Move Aimed at Protecting Access,” CBS News. August 3, 2022, available at <https://www.cbsnews.com/news/biden-abortion-executive-order-travel> (last visited October 27, 2022).+(last+visited+October+27,+2022).>Google Scholar