Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-13T09:21:56.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Impact of Web 2.0 on the Doctor-Patient Relationship

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Bernard Lo  and
Lindsay Parham
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The hypothetical case of Mr. Jenkins illustrates innovations in digital health information technology that may profoundly change medical care and the doctorpatient relationship. The Internet contains enormous amounts of health information, and about threequarters of Internet users look online for health information. 1 Sometimes patients bring information they found on the Internet to their physicians. Physicians and patients can also now communicate by e-mail rather than by telephone or office visits, although these e-mail communications may not be integrated into the patient’s medical record. Furthermore, electronic medical records are slowly being adopted, particularly in hospitals and large integrated health systems. Funding to promote the adoption of electronic medical records (EMRs) has been included in the 2009 federal stimulus package under the Obama Administration.

Type
Symposium
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 38 , Issue 1 , Spring 2010 , pp. 17 - 26
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fox, S., “The Engaged E-patient Population,” August 26, 2008, available at <http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/259/report_display.asp> (last visited December 10, 2009).Google Scholar
Lohr, S., “How to Make Electronic Records a Reality,” New York Times, March 1, 2009, at BU3.Google Scholar
Tang, T. C. and Lee, T. H., “Your Doctor's Office or the Internet? Two Paths to Personal Health Records,” New England Journal of Medicine 360 (2009): 1276–1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Mandl, K. D. and Kohane, I. S., “No Small Change for the Health Information Economy,” New England Journal of Medicine 360 (2009): 1278–1281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinbrook, R., “Personally Controlled Online Health Data – The Next Big Thing in Medical Care?” New England Journal of Medicine 358, no. 16 (2008): 1653–1656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, J. S., Aulakh, V., and Bosworth, A., “What It Takes: Characteristics of the Ideal Personal Health Record,” Health Affairs 28 (2009): 369–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfberg, A. J., “Genes on the Web: Direct-to-Consumer Marketing of Genetic Testing,” New England Journal of Medicine 355 (2006): 543–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMullan, M., “Patients Using the Internet to Obtain Health Information: How This Affects the Patient-Health Professional Relationship,” Patient Education Counseling 63 (2006): 24–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, E., Lo, B., Pollack, L., Donelan, K., Catania, J., and White, M. et al., “The Impact of Health Information on the Internet on the Physician-Patient Relationship: Patient Perceptions,” Archives of Internal Medicine 163 (2003): 1727–1734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wald, H. S., Dube, C. E., and Anthony, D. C., “Untangling the Web – The Impact of Internet Use on Health Care and the Physician-Patient Relationship,” Patient Education and Counseling 68 (2007): 218–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Murray, et al., supra note 9.Google Scholar
Detmer, D., Bloomrosen, M., Raymond, B., and Tang, P., “Integrated Personal Health Records: Transformative Tools for Consumer-Centric Care,” BMC Medical Informatics and Decisision Making 6 (2008): 45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Wald, et al., supra note 11.Google Scholar
Bernstam, E. V., Shelton, D. M., Walji, M., and Bernstam, F. M., “Instruments to Assess the Quality of Health Information on the World Wide Web: What Can Our Patients Actually Use?” International Journal of Medical Informatics 74 (2005): 13–19; Bernstam, E. V., Walji, M. F., Sagaram, S., Sagaram, D., Johnson, C. W., and Meric-Bernstam, F., “Commonly Cited Website Quality Criteria Are Not Effective at Identifying Inaccurate Online Information about Breast Cancer,” Cancer 112 (2008): 1206–1213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, M. L. and Fagnano, M., “Appropriate Antibiotic Use for Acute Otitis Media: What Consumers Find Using Web Searches,” Clinical Pediatrics (Phila) 47 (2008): 452–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Wald, et al., supra note 11.Google Scholar
Fox, S., “Online Health Search,” 2006, available at <http://www.pewinternet.org> (last visited December 10, 2009). Most internet users start at a search engine when looking for health information online. Very few check the source and date of the information they find.Google Scholar
Wiljer, D., Uroqitz, S., Apatu, E., DeLenardo, C., Eysenbach, G., and Harth, T. et al., “Patient Accesible Electronic Health Records: Exploring Recommendations for Successful Implementation Strategies,” Journal of Medical Internet Research 10, no. 4 (2008): e34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Murray, et al., supra note 10.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Halamka, J. D., Mandl, K. D., and Tang, P. C., “Early Experiences with Personal Health Records,” Journal of American Medical Informatics Association 15 (2008): 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janger, E. J., “Genetic Information, Privacy and Insolvency,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 33, no. 1 (2005): 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Murray, et al., supra note 10.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Murray, E., Lo, B., Pollack, L., Donelan, K., Catania, J., and Lee, K. et al., “The Impact of Health Information on the Internet on Health Care and the Physician-Patient Relationship: National U.S. Survey among 1.050 U.S. Physicians,” Journal of Medical Internet Research 5 (2003): e17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
See Murray, et al., supra note 28.Google Scholar
Deber, R. B., Kraetschmer, N., Urowitz, S., and Sharpe, N., “Do People Want to Be Autonomous Patients? Preferred Roles in Treatment Decision-Making in Several Patient Populations,” Health Expect 10 (2007): 248–258; Murray, E., Pollack, L., White, M., and Lo, B., “Clinical Decision-Making: Patients' Preferences and Experiences,” Patient Education and Counseling 65 (2007): 189–196; Levinson, W., Kao, A., Kuby, A., and Thisted, R. A., “Not All Patients Want to Participate in Decision Making: A National Study of Public Preferences,” Journal of General Internal Medicine 20 (2005): 531–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Say, R., Murtagh, M., and Thomson, R., “Patients' Preference for Involvement in Medical Decision Making: A Narrative Review,” Patient Education and Counseling 60 (2006): 102–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
See Levinson, et al., supra note 31.Google Scholar
See Say, et al., supra note 32.Google Scholar
See Murray, et al., supra note 31.Google Scholar
Haywood, K., Marshall, S., and Fitzpatrick, R., “Patient Participation in the Consultation Process: A Structured Review of Intervention Strategies,” Patient Education and Counseling 63 (2006): 12–23; Greenfield, S., Kaplan, S., and Ware, J. E. Jr., “Expanding Patient Involvement in Care: Effects on Patient Outcomes,” Annals of Internal Medicine 102 (1985): 520–528; Greenfield, S., Kaplan, S. H., Ware, J. E. Jr., Yano, E. M., and Frank, H. J., “Patients' Participation in Medical Care: Effects on Blood Sugar Control and Quality of Life in Diabetes,” Journal of General Internal Medicine 3 (1988): 448–457; Kaplan, S. H., Greenfield, S., Gandek, B., Rogers, W. H., Ware, J. E. Jr., “Characteristics of Physicians with Participatory Decision-Making Styles,” Annals of Internal Medicine 124 (1996): 497–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, R. H., D'Amato, K., Oliva, N., West, C. E., Adelson, J. W., “California's Digital Divide: Clinical Information Systems for the Haves and Have-Nots,” Health Affairs 28 (2009): 505–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Committee on Understanding and Eliminating Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care, Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care (Washington, D. C.: National Academies Press, 2003); World Health Organization, Closing the Gap in a Generation: Health Equity through Action on the Social Determinants of Health, 2008, available at <http://www.who.int/social_determinants/en/> (last visited December 10, 2009).+(last+visited+December+10,+2009).>Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “Cultivating Healthy Communities,” 2009, available at <http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/conference/> (last visited December 10, 2009).+(last+visited+December+10,+2009).>Google Scholar
Kahn, J. S., Personal Health Records in a Public Hospital: Experience at the HIV/AIDS clinic at San Francisco General Hospital,” (under review).Google Scholar
See Wald, et al., supra note 11.Google Scholar
Lo, B., Resolving Ethical Dilemmas: A Guide for Clinicians, 4th ed. (Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2009): at 31–39.Google Scholar
Id., at 107–116.Google Scholar
See Halamka, et al., supra note 23.Google Scholar
Gostin, L. O. and Nass, S., Beyond the HIPAA Privacy Rule: Enhancing Privacy, Improving Health through Research (Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Lo, B. and Alpers, A., “Uses and Abuses of Prescription Drug Information in Pharmacy Benefits Management Programs,” JAMA 283 (2000): 801–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Janger, , supra note 24.Google Scholar
Goetz, R. B. and Growdon, K. R., “A Defense of the Learned Intermediary Doctrine,” Food and Drug Law Journal 63 (2008): 421–438.Google Scholar
Gellad, Z. F., Lyles, K. W., “Direct-to-Consumer Advertising of Pharmaceuticals,” American Journal of Medicine 120 (2007): 475–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United States General Accounting Office, Prescription Drugs: FDA Oversight of Direct-to-Consumer Advertising Has Limitations, 2002, available at <http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d03177.pdf> (last visited December 10, 2009).+(last+visited+December+10,+2009).>Google Scholar
The Prescription Project, Academic Detailed: Evidence-Based Prescribing Information, 2008, available at <http://www.prescriptionproject.org/tools/solutions_factsheets/files/0007.pdf> (last visited March 9, 2009).+(last+visited+March+9,+2009).>Google Scholar
See Miller, et al., supra note 38.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar