Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-07T06:35:53.897Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cultural intelligence and employees’ creative performance: The moderating role of team conflict in interorganizational teams

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 January 2017

Nan Hu ,
Jianlin Wu  and
Jibao Gu
Nan Hu
Affiliation:
School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, PR China
Jianlin Wu
Affiliation:
School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, PR China
Jibao Gu*
Affiliation:
School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, PR China
*
Corresponding author: jibao@ustc.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recently, an increasing number of organizations conduct collaborative innovation by establishing interorganizational teams comprising employees from different organizations. Given that employees face immense challenges because of organizational culture differences in interorganizational teams, this study focused considerably on cultural intelligence in the interorganizational context. This cultural intelligence refers to the ability of individuals to deal effectively with organizational culture differences. Our research particularly explored the effect of employees’ cultural intelligence on their creative performance and the moderating effects of two types of team conflicts through hierarchical linear modeling. The sample was obtained from 54 interorganizational teams that included 275 employees. Results confirmed a positive relationship between employees’ cultural intelligence and their creative performance and the positive relationship will be stronger in higher relationship conflicts and lower task conflicts. The theoretical and practical implications of this study were also discussed.

Keywords

cultural intelligencerelationship conflicttask conflictemployees’ creative performanceinterorganizational team
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , January 2019 , pp. 96 - 116
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amason, A. C., & Mooney, A. C. (1999). The effects of past performance on top management team conflict in strategic decision making. International Journal of Conflict Management, 10(4), 340–359.Google Scholar
Andersen, P. H., & Kragh, H. (2013). Managing creativity in business market relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(1), 82–85.Google Scholar
Ang, S., & Van Dyne, L. (2008). Conceptualization of Cultural Intelligence: Definition, Distinctiveness, and Nomological Network. In S. Ang & L. Van Dyne (Eds.), Handbook on cultural intelligence: theory, measurement and applications (pp. 3–15). New York: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Ang, S., Van Dyne, L., Koh, C., Ng, K. Y., Templer, K. J., Tay, C., & Chandrasekar, N. A. (2007). Cultural intelligence: Its measurement and effects on cultural judgment and decision making, cultural adaptation and task performance. Management and Organization Review, 3(3), 335–371.Google Scholar
Arazy, O., Nov, O., Patterson, R., & Yeo, L. (2011). Information quality in Wikipedia: The effects of group composition and task conflict. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27(4), 71–98.Google Scholar
Axtell, C. M., Holman, D. J., Unsworth, K. L., Wall, T. D., Waterson, P. E., & Harrington, E. (2000). Shopfloor innovation: Facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 265–285.Google Scholar
Benedek, M., Jauk, E., Sommer, M., Arendasy, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014). Intelligence, creativity, and cognitive control: The common and differential involvement of executive functions in intelligence and creativity. Intelligence, 46, 73–83.Google Scholar
Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 349–381). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Bono, J. E., Boles, T. L., Judge, T. A., & Lauver, K. J. (2002). The role of personality in task and relationship conflict. Journal of Personality, 70(3), 311–344.Google Scholar
Cappella, J. N., & Green, J. (1984). The effects of distance and individual differences in arousability on nonverbal involvement: A test of discrepancy-arousal theory. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 8(4), 259–286.Google Scholar
Cappella, J. N., & Greene, J. O. (1982). A discrepancy-arousal explanation of mutual influence in expressive behavior for adult and infant-adult interaction 1. Communications Monographs, 49(2), 89–114.Google Scholar
Carlson, D. S., & Kacmar, K. M. (2000). Work–family conflict in the organization: Do life role values make a difference? Journal of Management, 26(5), 1031–1054.Google Scholar
Chang, S., Jia, L., Takeuchi, R., & Cai, Y. (2014). Do high-commitment work systems affect creativity? A multilevel combinational approach to employee creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(4), 665–680.Google Scholar
Chatenier, E. d., Verstegen, J. A., Biemans, H. J., Mulder, M., & Omta, O. S. (2010). Identification of competencies for professionals in open innovation teams. R&D Management, 40(3), 271–280.Google Scholar
Chen, G., Sharma, P. N., Edinger, S. K., Shapiro, D. L., & Farh, J.-L. (2011). Motivating and demotivating forces in teams: Cross-level influences of empowering leadership and relationship conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(3), 541–557.Google Scholar
Chen, M. H. (2006). Understanding the benefits and detriments of conflict on team creativity process. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15(1), 105–116.Google Scholar
Chen, M. H., Chang, Y. C., & Hung, S. C. (2008). Social capital and creativity in R&D project teams. R&D Management, 38(1), 21–34.Google Scholar
Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (2006). Open innovation: researching a new paradigm. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chuang, Y.-T., Church, R., & Zikic, J. (2004). Organizational culture, group diversity and intra-group conflict. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 10(1/2), 26–34.Google Scholar
De Dreu, C. K. (2006). When too little or too much hurts: Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between task conflict and innovation in teams. Journal of Management, 32(1), 83–107.Google Scholar
Deng, L., & Gibson, P. (2008). A qualitative evaluation on the role of cultural intelligence in cross-cultural leadership effectiveness. International Journal Of Leadership Studies, 3(2), 181–197.Google Scholar
Donati, S. (2013). An input-process-output approach to interorganizational teams: The influence of work group diversity, trust and shared leadership on communication network and team outputs. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Harm_Biemans/publication/41182702_The_Challenges_of_Collaborative_Knowledge_Creation_in_Open_Innovation_Teams/links/0912f5107ee4f254c0000000.pdf.Google Scholar
Drach-Zahavy, A. (2011). Interorganizational teams as boundary spanners: The role of team diversity, boundedness, and extrateam links. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20(1), 89–118.Google Scholar
Drazin, R., Glynn, M. A., & Kazanjian, R. K. (1999). Multilevel theorizing about creativity in organizations: A sensemaking perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 286–307.Google Scholar
Du Chatenier, E. (2009). Open innovation competence: towards a competence profile for inter-organizational collaboration in innovation teams. Wageningen: Wageningen University.Google Scholar
Du Chatenier, E., Verstegen, J. A., Biemans, H. J., Mulder, M., & Omta, O. (2009). The challenges of collaborative knowledge creation in open innovation teams. Human Resource Development Review, 8(3), 350–381.Google Scholar
Dul, J., Ceylan, C., & Jaspers, F. (2011). Knowledge workers’ creativity and the role of the physical work environment. Human Resource Management, 50(6), 715–734.Google Scholar
Earley, P. C., & Mosakowski, E. (2004). Cultural intelligence. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 139–146.Google Scholar
Elenkov, D. S., & Manev, I. M. (2009). Senior expatriate leadership’s effects on innovation and the role of cultural intelligence. Journal of World Business, 44(4), 357–369.Google Scholar
Enz, M. G., & Lambert, D. M. (2012). Using cross-functional, cross-firm teams to co-create value: The role of financial measures. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(3), 495–507.Google Scholar
Fey, C. F., & Beamish, P. W. (1999). Strategies for managing Russian international joint venture conflict. European Management Journal, 17(1), 99–106.Google Scholar
Gavin, M. B., & Hofmann, D. A. (2002). Using hierarchical linear modeling to investigate the moderating influence of leadership climate. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(1), 15–33.Google Scholar
Geert, H., & Jan, H. G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Gelfand, M. J., Imai, L., & Fehr, R. (2008). Thinking intelligently about cultural intelligence. In S. Ang & L. Van Dyne (Eds.), Handbook on cultural intelligence: Theory, measurement and applications (pp. 375–388). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Gerhart, B. (2009). How much does national culture constrain organizational culture? Management and Organization Review, 5(2), 241–259.Google Scholar
Geukes, K., Mesagno, C., Hanrahan, S. J., & Kellmann, M. (2012). Testing an interactionist perspective on the relationship between personality traits and performance under public pressure. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13(3), 243–250.Google Scholar
Gil, F., Alcover, C.-M., Peiró, J.-M., Margarida Passos, A., & Caetano, A. (2005). Exploring the effects of intragroup conflict and past performance feedback on team effectiveness. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20(3/4), 231–244.Google Scholar
Gong, Y., Cheung, S.-Y., Wang, M., & Huang, J.-C. (2012). Unfolding the proactive process for creativity integration of the employee proactivity, information exchange, and psychological safety perspectives. Journal of Management, 38(5), 1611–1633.Google Scholar
Gregory, R., Prifling, M., & Beck, R. (2009). The role of cultural intelligence for the emergence of negotiated culture in IT offshore outsourcing projects. Information Technology & People, 22(3), 223–241.Google Scholar
Groves, K. S., & Feyerherm, A. E. (2011). Leader cultural intelligence in context: Testing the moderating effects of team cultural diversity on leader and team performance. Group & Organization Management, 36(5), 535–566.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez, S. (2011). Management and leadership of innovative work teams. In S. Juana-Espinosa, J. A. Fernandez-Sanchez, E. Manresa-Marhuenda & J. Valdes-Conca (Eds.), Human resource management in the digital economy: Creating synergy between competency models and information (pp. 290–315). Pennsylvania, USA: IGI Global.Google Scholar
Härtel, C. E., & O’Connor, J. M. (2014). Contextualizing research: Putting context back into organizational behavior research. Journal of Management & Organization, 20(4), 417–422.Google Scholar
Hardy, C., Phillips, N., & Lawrence, T. B. (2003). Resources, knowledge and influence: The organizational effects of interorganizational collaboration*. Journal of Management Studies, 40(2), 321–347.Google Scholar
Harvey, S., Peterson, R. S., & Anand, N. (2014). The process of team boundary spanning in multi-organizational contexts. Small Group Research, 45(5), 506–538.Google Scholar
He, Y., Ding, X. H., & Yang, K. (2014). Unpacking the relationships between conflicts and team innovation: Empirical evidence from China. Management Decision, 52(8), 1533–1548.Google Scholar
Hirst, G., Van Knippenberg, D., Chen, C.-h., & Sacramento, C. A. (2011). How does bureaucracy impact individual creativity? A cross-level investigation of team contextual influences on goal orientation–creativity relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 624–641.Google Scholar
Hirst, G., Van Knippenberg, D., & Zhou, J. (2009). A cross-level perspective on employee creativity: Goal orientation, team learning behavior, and individual creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 52(2), 280–293.Google Scholar
Hobfoll, S. E., & Shirom, A. (2001). Conservation of resources theory: Applications to stress and management in the workplace. In R. T. Golembiewski (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 57–80). New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Hochwarter, W. A., Witt, L., Treadway, D. C., & Ferris, G. R. (2006). The interaction of social skill and organizational support on job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 482–489.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-C. (2009). Knowledge sharing and group cohesiveness on performance: An empirical study of technology R&D teams in Taiwan. Technovation, 29(11), 786–797.Google Scholar
Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287–302.Google Scholar
Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(2), 256–282.Google Scholar
Ji, L. J., Lee, A., & Guo, T. (2010). The thinking styles of Chinese people. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), Oxford handbook of Chinese psychology (2nd ed., pp. 155–167). Oxford: Oxford University.Google Scholar
Kim, K., Kirkman, B., & Chen, G. (2008). Cultural intelligence and international assignment effectiveness: A conceptual model and preliminary findings. In S. Ang & L. Van Dyne (Eds.), Handbook on cultural intelligence: Theory, measurement and applications (pp. 71–90). New York: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Kim, M. J., Choi, J. N., & Park, O. S. (2012). Intuitiveness and creativity in groups: Cross-level interactions between group conflict and individual cognitive styles. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 40(9), 1419–1434.Google Scholar
Kim, T.-Y., Hon, A. H., & Lee, D.-R. (2010). Proactive personality and employee creativity: The effects of job creativity requirement and supervisor support for creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 22(1), 37–45.Google Scholar
Lawson, B., Petersen, K. J., Cousins, P. D., & Handfield, R. B. (2009). Knowledge sharing in interorganizational product development teams: The effect of formal and informal socialization mechanisms*. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(2), 156–172.Google Scholar
Li, J., & Hambrick, D. C. (2005). Factional groups: A new vantage on demographic faultlines, conflict, and disintegration in work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 794–813.Google Scholar
Liao, H., Liu, D., & Loi, R. (2010). Looking at both sides of the social exchange coin: A social cognitive perspective on the joint effects of relationship quality and differentiation on creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 53(5), 1090–1109.Google Scholar
Liu, J., Kwan, H. K., Fu, P. P., & Mao, Y. (2013). Ethical leadership and job performance in China: The roles of workplace friendships and traditionality. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86(4), 564–584.Google Scholar
Madjar, N. (2005). The contributions of different groups of individuals to employees’ creativity. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 7(2), 182–206.Google Scholar
Madjar, N. (2008). Emotional and informational support from different sources and employee creativity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 81(1), 83–100.Google Scholar
Martins, L. L., Schilpzand, M. C., Kirkman, B. L., Ivanaj, S., & Ivanaj, V. (2012). A contingency view of the effects of cognitive diversity on team performance: The moderating roles of team psychological safety and relationship conflict. Small Group Research, 44(2), 96–126.Google Scholar
Muñoz-Doyague, M. F., & Nieto, M. (2012). Individual creativity performance and the quality of interpersonal relationships. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 112(1), 125–145.Google Scholar
Panteli, N., & Sockalingam, S. (2005). Trust and conflict within virtual inter-organizational alliances: A framework for facilitating knowledge sharing. Decision Support Systems, 39(4), 599–617.Google Scholar
Perry-Smith, J. E. (2006). Social yet creative: The role of social relationships in facilitating individual creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 85–101.Google Scholar
Perry-Smith, J. E., & Shalley, C. E. (2003). The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 89–106.Google Scholar
Peterson, B. (2004). Cultural intelligence: A guide to working with people from other cultures. Yarmouth: Intercultural Press.Google Scholar
Pothukuchi, V., Damanpour, F., Choi, J., Chen, C. C., & Park, S. H. (2002). National and organizational culture differences and international joint venture performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(2), 243–265.Google Scholar
Pullen, A. J., Weerd-Nederhof, P. C., Groen, A. J., & Fisscher, O. A. (2012). Open innovation in practice: Goal complementarity and closed NPD networks to explain differences in innovation performance for SMEs in the medical devices sector. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(6), 917–934.Google Scholar
Rahim, M. A. (2014). A structural equations model of leaders’ social intelligence and creative performance. Creativity and Innovation Management, 23(1), 44–56.Google Scholar
Rau, D. (2005). The influence of relationship conflict and trust on the transactive memory performance relation in top management teams. Small Group Research, 36(6), 746–771.Google Scholar
Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., & Congdon, R. (2002). Hierarchical linear modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Richter, A. W., Hirst, G., Van Knippenberg, D., & Baer, M. (2012). Creative self-efficacy and individual creativity in team contexts: Cross-level interactions with team informational resources. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(6), 1282–1290.Google Scholar
Ritter, T., & Gemünden, H. G. (2004). The impact of a company’s business strategy on its technological competence, network competence and innovation success. Journal of Business Research, 57(5), 548–556.Google Scholar
Rockmann, K. W., Pratt, M. G., & Northcraft, G. B. (2007). Divided loyalties determinants of identification in interorganizational teams. Small Group Research, 38(6), 727–751.Google Scholar
Rose, G. M., & Shoham, A. (2004). Interorganizational task and emotional conflict with international channels of distribution. Journal of Business Research, 57(9), 942–950.Google Scholar
Shalley, C. E., Gilson, L. L., & Blum, T. C. (2009). Interactive effects of growth need strength, work context, and job complexity on self-reported creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 489–505.Google Scholar
Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 933–958.Google Scholar
Shaw, J. D., Zhu, J., Duffy, M. K., Scott, K. L., Shih, H.-A., & Susanto, E. (2011). A contingency model of conflict and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(2), 391–400.Google Scholar
Sheridan, J. E. (1992). Organizational culture and employee retention. Academy of Management Journal, 35(5), 1036–1056.Google Scholar
Shin, S. J., Kim, T.-Y., Lee, J.-Y., & Bian, L. (2012). Cognitive team diversity and individual team member creativity: A cross-level interaction. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 197–212.Google Scholar
Simons, T. L., & Peterson, R. S. (2000). Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 102–111.Google Scholar
Sirmon, D. G., & Lane, P. J. (2004). A model of cultural differences and international alliance performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(4), 306–319.Google Scholar
Stock, R. M. (2006). Interorganizational teams as boundary spanners between supplier and customer companies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(4), 588–599.Google Scholar
Stock, R. M. (2014). How should customers be integrated for effective interorganizational NPD teams? An input–process–output perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(3), 535–551.Google Scholar
Teigland, R., & Wasko, M. M. (2003). Integrating knowledge through information trading: Examining the relationship between boundary spanning communication and individual performance*. Decision Sciences, 34(2), 261–286.Google Scholar
Temmink, J. (2015). The effect of inter-organizational team cooperation on collaborative innovation performance. Paper presented at 5th IBA Bachelor Thesis Conference, 2 July 2015, Enschede, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Tett, R. P., & Burnett, D. D. (2003). A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 500–517.Google Scholar
Tett, R. P., & Guterman, H. A. (2000). Situation trait relevance, trait expression, and cross-situational consistency: Testing a principle of trait activation. Journal of Research in Personality, 34(4), 397–423.Google Scholar
Tidd, J., Bessant, J., & Pavitt, K. (2001). Managing innovation: Integrating technological, market and organizational change (2nd ed.). Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1137–1148.Google Scholar
Triandis, H. C. (2006). Cultural intelligence in organizations. Group & Organization Management, 31(1), 20–26.Google Scholar
Weingart, L. R., Todorova, G., & Cronin, M. A. (2010). Task conflict, problem-solving, and yielding: Effects on cognition and performance in functionally diverse innovation teams. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 3(4), 312–337.Google Scholar
Wong, S.-S., & Burton, R. M. (2000). Virtual teams: What are their characteristics, and impact on team performance? Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 6(4), 339–360.Google Scholar
Woodman, R. W., & Schoenfeldt, L. F. (1990). An interactionist model of creative behavior. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 24(1), 10–20.Google Scholar
Yang, F., Qian, J., Tang, L., & Zhang, L. (2016). No longer take a tree for the forest: A cross-level learning-related perspective on individual innovative behavior. Journal of Management & Organization, 22(3), 291–310.Google Scholar
Yong, K., Sauer, S. J., & Mannix, E. A. (2014). Conflict and creativity in interdisciplinary teams. Small Group Research, 45(3), 266–289.Google Scholar
Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2003). Awakening employee creativity: The role of leader emotional intelligence. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(4), 545–568.Google Scholar
Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2001). Enhancing creative performance: Effects of expected developmental assessment strategies and creative personality. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 35(3), 151–167.Google Scholar
Zou, X., & Ingram, P. (2013). Bonds and boundaries: Network structure, organizational boundaries, and job performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120(1), 98–109.Google Scholar