Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-31T06:10:48.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Preliminary study on alternating thienylene/phenylene copolymers functionalized with an electron-donating or -withdrawing group

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

J. M. Xu*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, National University of Singapore, Kent Ridge, Singapore 119260
S. C. Ng
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, National University of Singapore, Kent Ridge, Singapore 119260
H. S. O. Chan
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, National University of Singapore, Kent Ridge, Singapore 119260
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mial: chmngsc@nus.edu.sg
Get access

Abstract

Three novel regioregular polymers substituted with electron-donating or -withdrawing groups, poly[1,4-bis(3-X-2,5-thienylene)phenylene-alt-2,5-dioctyl-1,4-phenylene] [PBT(X), X = OMe, H, CN], were synthesized and characterized. They are highly fluorescent, but the absorption wavelength of PBT(CN) and PBT(OMe) are shifted toward the blue and red regions, respectively, with reference to PBT(H). The onset reduction potential of PBT(CN) is –1.11 V versus SCE (saturated calomel electrode), which is higher than that of the cyano derivative of poly(phenylene vinylene), indicating it be a good candidate as electron transport layer. The onset oxidation and reduction potentials of PBT(OMe) (0.96 and –1.28 V versus SCE respectively) suggest it would perform well as emissive layer in light-emitting display applications.

Type
Rapid Communications
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Greenham, N.G., Moratti, S.C., Bradley, D.D.C., Friend, R.H., and Holmes, A.B., Nature 365, 628 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Gao, J., Yu, G., and Heeger, A.J., Adv. Mater. 10, 692 (1998).3.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.McCoy, R.K., Karasz, F.E., Sarker, A., and Lahti, P.M., Chem. Mater. 3, 941 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Li, X-C., Kraft, A., Cervini, R., Spencer, G.C.W., Cacialli, F., Friend, R.H., Gruner, J., Holmes, A.B., DeMello, J.C., and Moratti, S.C., in Electrical, Optical, and Magnetic Properties of Organic Solid-State Materials III, edited by Jen, A.K-Y., Lee, C.Y-C., Dalton, L.R., Rubner, M.F., Wnek, G.E., and Chiang, L.Y., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 413, Pittsburgh, PA, (1996), p. 13.Google Scholar
5.Kraft, A., Grimsdale, A.C., and Holmes, A.B., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 37, 402 (1998).3.0.CO;2-9>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Ng, S.C., Xu, J.M., and Chan, H.S.O., J. Mater. Chem. 9, 381 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Ng, S.C., Xu, J.M., and Chan, H.S.O., Synth. Met. 92, 33 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Ng, S.C., Xu, J.M., and Chan, H.S.O., Macromolecules 33, 7349 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Friend, R.H. and Greenham, N.G., in Handbook of Conducting Polymers, edited by Skotheim, T.A., Elsenbaumer, R.L., and Reynolds, J.R. (Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, Basel, Hong Kong, 1998), p. 836.Google Scholar
10.Bredas, J.L., and Heeger, A.J., Chem. Phys. Lett. 217, 507 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar