Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-31T03:51:56.932Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Genus Strombus (Mollusca: Caenogastropoda: Strombidae) in the Neogene of the Bocas Del Toro Area, Panama, by the description of three new species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Bernard Landau ,
Gijs C. Kronenberg ,
Gregory S. Herbert  and
Carlos M. Da Silva
Bernard Landau
Affiliation:
1Departamento de Geologia e Centro de Geologia, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Campo Grande, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal and International Health Centres, Av. Infante de Henrique 7, Areias São João, P-8200 Albufeira, Portugal,
Gijs C. Kronenberg
Affiliation:
2Mollusca collection, NCB Naturalis, PO Box 9517, NL-2300 RA Leiden, the Netherlands,
Gregory S. Herbert
Affiliation:
3Department of Geology, University of South Florida, Tampa 33620, USA,
Carlos M. Da Silva
Affiliation:
4Departamento de Geologia e Centro de Geologia, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Campo Grande 1749-016, Lisboa, Portugal,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In contrast to the immense effort that has been put into the geological survey and stratigraphic study of the Neogene of Bocas del Toro region (Panama), little research has been done on the systematics of this region's rich gastropod assemblages. This is the first paper dealing primarily with the Bocas Neogene gastropod assemblages (Strombidae) since the pioneer work of Olsson (1922). Neogene strombid assemblages of the Dominican Republic have recently been reviewed and updated, and, therefore, the Strombidae are a suitable starting point for the revision of the gastropod assemblages from the Neogene of Bocas del Toro. Six species of Strombus are described, three of them new: S. acanthospira n. sp., S. pugiloides, S. gatunensis, S. elegantissimus n. sp., S. vermeiji n. sp. and S. cf. floridanus.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 85 , Issue 2 , March 2011 , pp. 337 - 352
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aubry, M.-P. 1993. Calcareous nannoplankton evolution: dominance, diversification and success. Geological Society of America, Annual Meeting, Abstracts with Programs, 25:358.Google Scholar
Bandel, K. 2007. About the larval shell of some Stromboidea, connected to a review of the classification and phylogeny of the Strombimorpha (Caenogastropoda). Freiberger Forschungshefte, C-524:97–206.Google Scholar
Berggren, W. A. 1993. Neogene planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy of eastern Jamaica. Geological Society of America Memoir, 182:179–217.Google Scholar
Bolli, H. M. and Bermudez, P. J.. 1965. Zonation based on planktonic foraminifers of Middle Miocene to Pliocene warm-water sediments. Bolletin Informativo, Asociacion Venezolana de Geologia, Mineria y Petroleo, 8:119–149.Google Scholar
Bolli, H. M. and Premoli Silva, I.. 1973. Oligocene to Recent planctonic Foraminifera and stratigraphy of the Leg 15 sites in the Caribbean Sea. Initial Report Deep Sea Drilling Project, 15:475–497.Google Scholar
Brown, A. P. and Pilsbry, H. A.. 1911. Fauna of the Gatun Formation, Isthmus of Panama. Proceedings of the Philadelphia Academy of Sciences, 63:336–373.Google Scholar
Coates, A. G., Aubry, M. P., Berggren, W. A., Collins, L. S., and Kunk, M.. 2003. Early Neogene history of the Central American arc from Bocas del Toro, western Panama. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 115:271–287.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coates, A. G., Mcneill, D. F., Aubry, M. P., Berggren, W. A., and Collins, L. S.. 2005. An introduction to the Geology of the Bocas del Toro Archipelago, Panama. Caribbean Journal of Science, 41:374–391.Google Scholar
Collins, L. S. and Coates, A. G.. 1999. Introduction, p. 5–13. In Collins, L. S. and Coates, A. G. (eds.), A paleobiotic survey of the Caribbean faunas from the Neogene of the Isthmus of Panama. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 357.Google Scholar
Cotton, M. A. 1999. Neogene planktic foraminiferal biochronology of the southern Central American isthmus, p. 61–80. In Collins, L. S. and Coates, A. G. (eds.), A paleobiotic survey of the Caribbean faunas from the Neogene of the Isthmus of Panama. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 357.Google Scholar
Dance, S. P., 1986. A history of shell collecting. i-xv, 1–265, 32 pls.E.J. Brill, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freiheit, J. R. and Geary, O. H.. 2009. Neogene paleontology of the northern Dominican Republic. Strombid gastropods (genera Strombus and Lobatus; Mollusca: Gastropoda: Strombidae) of the Cibao Valley. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 376:1–54.Google Scholar
Gabb, W. M. 1873. On the topography and geology of Santo Domingo. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society (ns), 15:49–259, 2 fold-out maps.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geary, D. H., Allmon, W. D., and Reaka-Kudla, M. L.. 1991. Stomatopod predation on fossil gastropods from the Plio-Pleistocene of Florida. Journal of Paleontology, 65:355–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gmelin, J.F. 1791. C. a Linné … Systema naturae per regna tria naturae … editio decima tertia, aucta, reformata, cura J. F. Gmelin. Tomus I, pars VI, Vermes testacea. G. E. Beer, Lipsiae. p. 3021–4120.Google Scholar
Guppy, R. J. L. 1867. On the Tertiary fossils of the West Indies with special reference to the classification of the Kainozoic rocks of Trinidad. Proceedings of the Scientific Association of Trinidad, 1:145–176.Google Scholar
Guppy, R. J. L. 1873. On some new Tertiary fossils from Jamaica. Proceedings of the Scientific Association of Trinidad, 2:72–88.Google Scholar
Guppy, R. J. L. 1874. On the West Indian Tertiary fossils. Geological Magazine, Decade 2, 1:404–411; 433-454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guppy, R. J. L. 1876. On the Miocene fossils of Haiti. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 32:516–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hargreave, D. 1995. An ontogenetic approach to understanding changes in shell morphology over time: the Strombus alatus complex in the Plio-Pleistocene of southern Florida. Tulane Studies in Geology and Paleontology, 27:1–52.Google Scholar
Herbert, G. S., Dietl, G. P., and Vermeij, G. J.. 2004. Pleistocene escalation in strombid gastropods of Florida and a possible catalyst role for glacial “super-El Niño” conditions. Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Program, 36:480.Google Scholar
Ingram, W. M. 1939. New fossil Cypraeidae from the Miocene of the Dominican Republic and Panama, with a survey of the Miocene species of the Dominican Republic. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 24:1–14.Google Scholar
Iredale, T. 1921. Molluscan nomenclatural problems and solutions. Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London, 14:198–208.Google Scholar
Johnson, K. G., Todd, J. A., and Jackson, J. B. C.. 2007. Coral reef development drives molluscan diversity increase at local and regional scales in the late Neogene and Quaternary of the southwestern Caribbean. Paleobiology, 33:24–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung, P. and Heitz, A.. 2001. The subgenus Lentigo (Gastropoda: Strombidae) in tropical America, fossil and living. The Veliger, 44:20–53.Google Scholar
Landau, B. M., Kronenberg, G. C., and Herbert, G. S.. 2008. A Large New Species of Lobatus (Gastropoda: Strombidae) from the Neogene of the Dominican Republic, with Notes on the Genus. The Veliger, 50:31–38.Google Scholar
Landau, B. M., Kronenberg, G. C., and da Silva, C. M.. 2010. A new species of Lobatus (Mollusca: Caenogastropoda: Strombidae) from the Neogene of the Dominican Republic, with notes on further species from the Dominican assemblages. Basteria, 74:95–109.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. 1758. Systema naturae, per Regna tria Naturae secundum Classes, Ordines, Genera, Species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Editio decima, reformata. Tomus, 1:1–823Holmiae.Google Scholar
Mansfield, W.C. 1930. Miocene gastropods and scaphopods of the Choctawhatchee formation of Florida. Florida State Geological Survey Bulletin, 3:1–142, pls. 1-21.Google Scholar
Maury, C. J. 1917. Santo Domingo type sections and fossils. Pt. 1 Mollusca. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 5:165–415.Google Scholar
Montfort, D. de. 1810. Conchyliologie Systématique et classification méthodique des coquilles; offrant leurs gigures, leur arrangement générique, leurs descriptions caractérestiques, leurs noms; ainsi que leur synonymie en plusieurs langues. 1–676F. Schoell, Paris.Google Scholar
Moore, J. C. 1863. On some Tertiary shells from Jamaica; with a note on the corals, by P. Martin Duncan, M.B., F.G.S.; and a note on some Nummulinae and Orbitoides, by Prof. T. Rupert Jones, F.G.S. Journal of the Geological Society of London, 19:510–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsson, A. A. 1922. The Miocene of northern Costa Rica. With notes on its general stratigraphic relations. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 9:174–482.Google Scholar
Palmer, A. R. 1979. Fish predation and the evolution of gastropod shell sculpture: experimental and geographic evidence. Evolution, 33:697–713CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perrilliat, C. M. 1972. Monografia de los moluscos del Mioceno Medio de Santa Rosa, Veracruz, Mexico. Parte I. (Gasterópodos: Fissurellidae a Olividae). Paleontologia Mexicana, 32:1–130.Google Scholar
Petuch, E. J. 1991. New gastropods from the Plio-Pleistocene of southwestern Florida and the Everglades basin. Dept. of Geology and W. H. Dall Paleontological Research Center, Florida Atlantic University Special publications, 1:1–59, pls 1-30.Google Scholar
Petuch, E. J. 1994. Atlas of Florida fossil shells (Pliocene and Pleistocene marine Gastropods). Department of Geology, Florida Atlantic University and The Graves Museum of Archaeology and Natural History. Chicago Spectrum Press, 394 p.Google Scholar
Pilsbry, H. J. 1922. Revision of W. M. Gabb's Tertiary Mollusca of Santo Domingo. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 73:305–435.Google Scholar
Rafinesque, C.S. 1815. Analyse de la Nature, ou tableau de l'Univers et des Corps Organisées. L'Imprimerie de Jean Barravecchia, Palermo, 224 p.Google Scholar
Riccardi, A. C. 2009. “IUGS ratified ICS Recommendation on redefinition of Pleistocene and formal definition of base of Quaternary.” International Union of Geological Sciences. http://www.stratigraphy.org/upload/IUGS%20Ratification_Q%20&%20Pleistocene.pdfGoogle Scholar
Röding, P. F. 1798. Museum Boltenianum sive catalogus cimeliorum e tribus regnis naturae que olim collegerat Joa. Fried Bolten, M.D.p.d. per XL annos proto physicus Hamburgensis. Pars Secunda continens Conchylia sive Testacea univalvia, bivalvia & multivalvia, I–VIII, 1-199, Hamburg.Google Scholar
Sherborn, C. D., 1940. Where is the —– collection? An account of the various natural history collections which have come under the notice of the compiler between 1880 and 1939. The University Press, Cambridge, p. 1–147.Google Scholar
Sowerby, G. B. I. 1850. Descriptions of new Species of Fossil Shells found by J.S. Heniker, Esq. The Quaterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 6:44–53, pls. 9-10.Google Scholar
Toula, F. 1909. Eine jungtertiäre Fauna von Gatun am Panama-Kanal. Jahrbuch der Kaiserlich Königlichen Geologischen Reichsanstalt, 58:673–760, pls 1-4 (25-28).Google Scholar
Vokes, E. H. 1990. Cenozoic Muricidae of the Western Atlantic region. Part VIII–Murex s.s., Haustellum, Chicoreus, and Hexaplex; additions and corrections. Tulane Studies in Geology and Paleontology, 23:1–96.Google Scholar
Woodring, W. P., 1925. Miocene Mollusca from Bowden Jamaica, pelecypods and scaphopods. Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication, 366:1–564, pls 1-40.Google Scholar
Woodring, W. P., 1928. Miocene mollusks from Bowden, Jamaica II. Gastropods and discussion of results. Carnegie Inst. of Washington, Washington, D.C. i-vii, 564 p., 40 pls.Google Scholar
Woodring, W. P. 1957. Geology and paleontology of the Canal Zone and adjoining parts of Panama. Geology and description of the Tertiary Mollusks (Gastropods: Trochidae to Turritellidae). United States Geological Survey Professional Paper, 306-A:1–145.Google Scholar
Woodring, W. P. 1959. Geology and paleontology of the Canal Zone and adjoining parts of Panama. Geology and description of the Tertiary Mollusks (Gastropods: Vermetidae to Thaididae). United States Geological Survey Professional Paper, 306-B:147–239.Google Scholar
Woodring, W. P. 1964. Geology and paleontology of the Canal Zone and adjoining parts of Panama. Geology and description of the Tertiary Mollusks (Gastropods: Columbellidae to Volutidae). United States Geological Survey Professional Paper, 306-C:241–297.Google Scholar
Woodring, W. P. 1970. Geology and paleontology of the Canal Zone and adjoining parts of Panama. Geology and description of the Tertiary Mollusks (Gastropods: Eulimidae, Marginellidae to Helminthoglyptidae). United States Geological Survey Professional Paper, 306-D:299–452.Google Scholar
Woodring, W. P. 1973. Geology and paleontology of the Canal Zone and adjoining parts of Panama. Geology and description of the Tertiary Mollusks (Additions to gastropods, scaphopods, pelecypods: Nuculidae to Malleidae). United States Geological Survey Professional Paper, 306-E:453–539.Google Scholar