Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-14T02:36:20.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

THE ÉTALE GROUPOID OF AN INVERSE SEMIGROUP AS A GROUPOID OF FILTERS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2013

M. V. LAWSON*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Maxwell Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Riccarton, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, UK
S. W. MARGOLIS
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Bar-Ilan University, 52900 Ramat Gan, Israel email margolis@math.biu.ac.il
B. STEINBERG
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, The City College of New York, NAC 8/133, Convent Ave. at 138th Street, New York, NY 10031, USA email bsteinberg@ccny.cuny.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Paterson showed how to construct an étale groupoid from an inverse semigroup using ideas from functional analysis. This construction was later simplified by Lenz. We show that Lenz’s construction can itself be further simplified by using filters: the topological groupoid associated with an inverse semigroup is precisely a groupoid of filters. In addition, idempotent filters are closed inverse subsemigroups and so determine transitive representations by means of partial bijections. This connection between filters and representations by partial bijections is exploited to show how linear representations of inverse semigroups can be constructed from the groups occurring in the associated topological groupoid.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright ©2013 Australian Mathematical Publishing Association Inc. 

References

Funk, J. and Hofstra, P., ‘Topos theoretic aspects of semigroup actions’, Theory Appl. Categ. 24 (2010), 117147.Google Scholar
Green, J. A., Polynomial Representations of GLn, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 830 (Springer, Berlin, 1980).Google Scholar
Howie, J. M., Fundamentals of Semigroup Theory (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellendonk, J., ‘The local structure of tilings and their integer group of coinvariants’, Commun. Math. Phys. 187 (1997), 115157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellendonk, J., ‘Topological equivalence of tilings’, J. Math. Phys. 38 (1997), 18231842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellendonk, J. and Lawson, M. V., ‘Tiling semigroups’, J. Algebra 224 (2000), 140150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellendonk, J. and Lawson, M. V., ‘Universal groups for point-sets and tilings’, J. Algebra 276 (2004), 462492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, M. V., ‘Coverings and embeddings of inverse semigroups’, Proc. Edinb. Math. Soc. 36 (1993), 399419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, M. V., Inverse Semigroups (World Scientific, Singapore, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, M. V., ‘Ordered groupoids and left cancellative categories’, Semigroup Forum 68 (2004), 458476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, M. V., ‘A noncommutative generalization of Stone duality’, J. Austral. Math. Soc. 88 (2010), 385404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, M. V. and Lenz, D. H., ‘Pseudogroups and their étale groupoids’, arXiv:1107.5511v2.Google Scholar
Lawson, M. V. and Steinberg, B., ‘Ordered groupoids and étendues’, Cah. Topol. Geom. Differ. Categ. 45 (2004), 82108.Google Scholar
Leech, J., ‘Inverse monoids with a natural semilattice ordering’, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 70 (3) (1995), 146182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenz, D. H., ‘On an order-based construction of a topological groupoid from an inverse semigroup’, Proc. Edinb. Math. Soc. 51 (2008), 387406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolis, S. W. and Meakin, J. C., ‘Free inverse monoids and graph immersions’, Internat. J. Algebra Comput. 3 (1993), 7999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munn, W. D., ‘Matrix representations of inverse semigroups’, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 14 (3) (1964), 165181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paterson, A. L. T., Groupoids, Inverse Semigroups, and their Operator Algebras (Birkhäuser, Boston, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrich, M., Inverse Semigroups (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1984).Google Scholar
Renault, J., A Groupoid Approach to C *-algebras (Springer, Berlin, 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Resende, P., ‘Etale groupoids and their quantales’, Adv. Math. 208 (2007), 147209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruyle, R. L., ‘Pseudovarieties of inverse monoids’, PhD Thesis, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 1997.Google Scholar
Schein, B. M., ‘Representations of generalized groups’, Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved. Mat. 3 (1962), 164176 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Schein, B. M., ‘Noble inverse semigroups with bisimple core’, Semigroup Forum 36 (1987), 175178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schein, B. M., ‘Infinitesimal elements and transitive representations of inverse semigroups’, in: Proc. Int. Symp. on the Semigroup Theory and its Related Fields, Kyoto, 1990 (Shimane University, Matsue, 1990), 197203.Google Scholar
Schein, B. M., ‘Cosets in groups and semigroups’, in: Semigroups with Applications (eds. Howie, J. M., Munn, W. D. and Weinert, H. J.) (World Scientific, Singapore, 1992), 205221.Google Scholar
Steinberg, B., ‘A topological approach to inverse and regular semigroups’, Pacific J. Math. 208 (2003), 367396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, B., ‘A groupoid approach to discrete inverse semigroup algebras’, Adv. Math. 223 (2010), 689727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar