Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-10T10:40:53.563Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Numerical Range of the Derivation of an Induced Operator

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2009

Randall R. Holmes
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama 36849-5310, USAholmerr@auburn.edu, tamtiny@auburn.edu
Chi-Kwong Li
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, College of William and Mary, PO Box 8795, Williamsburg, Virginia 23187-8795, USAckli@math.wm.edu
Tin-Yau Tam
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama 36849-5310, USAholmerr@auburn.edu, tamtiny@auburn.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Let V be an n–dimensional inner product space over , let H be a subgroup of the symmetric group on {l,…, m}, and let x: Hbe an irreducible character. Denote by (H) the symmetry class of tensors over V associated with H and x. Let K (T) ∈ End((H)) be the operator induced by T ∈ End(V), and let DK(T) be the derivation operator of T. The decomposable numerical range W*(DK(T)) of DK(T) is a subset of the classical numerical range W(DK(T)) of DK(T). It is shown that there is a closed star-shaped subset of complex numbers such that

⊆ W*(DK(T))W(DK(T)) = con

where conv denotes the convex hull of . In many cases, the set is convex, and thus the set inclusions are actually equalities. Some consequences of the results and related topics are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 2007

References

[1] Au-Yeung, Y. H. and Tsing, N. K., ‘Some theorems on the numerical range’, Linear Multilinear Algebra 15 (1984), 311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Bebiano, N., Li, C. K. and Providencia, J. da, ‘Some results on the numerical range of a derivation’, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 14 (1993), 10841095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Bebiano, N., Li, C. K. and Providencia, J. da, ‘Generalized numerical ranges of permanental compounds arising from quantum systems of bosons’, Electron. J. Linear Algebra 7 (2000), 7391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Bhatia, R., Matrix Analysis (Springer, New York, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Djokovic, D. Z. and Tam, T. Y., ‘Some questions about semisimple Lie groups originating in matrix theory’, Canad. J. Math. 46 (2003), 332343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Goldberg, M. and Straus, E. G., ‘Elementary inclusion relations for generalized numerical ranges’, Linear Algebra and Appl. 18(1977), 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Halmos, P. R., A Hilbert Space Problem Book (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1978).Google Scholar
[8] Holmes, R. R., ‘Orthogonal bases of symmetrized tensor spaces’, Linear Multilinear Algebra 39 (1995), 241243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Holmes, R. R. and Tam, T. Y., ‘Symmetry classes of tensors associated with certain groups’, Linear Multilinear Algebra 32 (1992), 2131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Isaacs, I. M., Character Theory of Finite Croups (Academic Press, New York, 1976).Google Scholar
[11] James, G. and Kerber, A., The Representation Theory of the Symmetric Group, Encyclopedia of Mathematics and Its Applications, Volume 16 (Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1981).Google Scholar
[12] James, G. and Liebeck, M., Representations and Characters of Groups, Cambridge Mathematical Textbooks (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993).Google Scholar
[13] Li, C. K. and Tam, T. Y., ‘Operator properties of T and K(T)’, Linear Algebra and Appl. 401 (2005), 173191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14] Li, C. K. and Tsing, N. K., ‘The numerical range of derivations’, Linear Algebra and Appl. 119 (1989), 97119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15] Li, C. K. and Zaharia, A., ‘Decomposable numerical range on orthonormal decomposable tensors’, Linear Algebra and Appl. 308 (2000), 139152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16] Marcus, M., Finite Dimensional Multilinear Algebra, Part I (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1973).Google Scholar
[17] Marcus, M., Finite Dimensional Multilinear Algebra, Part II (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1975).Google Scholar
[18] Marcus, M., ‘Some combinatorial aspects of numerical range’, Second International Conference on Combinatorial Mathematis (New York) Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 319 (1979), 368376.Google Scholar
[19] Marcus, M., ‘Ranges of derivations’, manuscript. 1989.Google Scholar
[20] Merris, R., Multilinear Algebra (Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, Amsterdam. 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21] Poon, Y. T., ‘Another proof of a result of Westwick’, Linear Multilinear Algebra 9 (1980), 3537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22] Rockafellar, R. T., Convex Analysis (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23] Tam, T. Y., ‘Convexity of generalized numerical range associated with a compact Lie group’, J. Austral. Math. Soc. 71 (2001), 110.Google Scholar
[24] Tsing, N. K., ‘On the shape of the generalized numerical ranges’, Linear Multilinear Algebra 10 (1981), 173182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[25] Wang, B. Y., Foundation of Multilinear Algebra, (in Chinese) (Beijing Normal University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
[26] Wang, B. Y. and Gong, M. P., ‘A high symmetry class of tensors with an orthogonal basis of decomposable symmetrized tensors’, Linear Multilinear Algebra 30 (1991), 6164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[27] Westwick, R., ‘A theorem on numerical range’, Linear Multilinear Algebra 2 (1975), 311315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar