No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Essential Business: The Flu, the War, and the Economy
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 April 2023
Abstract
During the First World War, the term “essential business” was used initially in military procurement, and then in disease control when pandemic influenza struck. Essential businesses were exempt from restrictions imposed in the interest of national defense or public health, so debates about essential business concerned the necessity of various goods and services to the consumer. Ultimately, the concept of essential business depended on a shared understanding of the American consumer’s rights and duties as a citizen. On the one hand, consumers furthered the state’s interests by complying with, interpreting, implementing, and enforcing public-health restrictions. On the other, what contemporaries called “the American standard of living” entitled citizens to maintain relatively large expenditures. This relationship between citizenship and consumption explains the economy’s surprising stability in 1918. The flu did not cause a depression because social norms authorized most consumer expenditures as legitimate and appropriate, even during the wartime epidemic. “Essential” work is theorized using the Marxist concept of socially necessary labor, which relates productivity and purchasing power to norms of consumption.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Historians of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era (SHGAPE)
References
Notes
The author thanks Erik Baker, Tim Barker, Martin Bernstein, Hannah Marcus, Stephen Marglin, Martin Saavedra, Sophie Wilkowske, and Jesse Williams for their helpful suggestions.
1 Johnson, Niall P. A. S. and Mueller, Juergen, “Updating the Accounts: Global Mortality of the 1918–1920 ‘Spanish’ Influenza Pandemic,” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 76 (Spring 2002): 105–15CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.
2 Crosby, Alfred W., America’s Forgotten Pandemic: The Influenza of 1918, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), 241–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Spinney, Laura, Pale Rider: The Spanish Flu of 1918 and How It Changed the World (New York: PublicAffairs, 2018), 140–49Google Scholar.
3 Arnold, Catharine, Pandemic 1918: Eyewitness Accounts from the Greatest Medical Holocaust in Modern History (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2018), 30–32Google Scholar; Barry, John M., The Great Influenza: The Story of the Deadliest Pandemic in History (New York: Penguin Books, 2005), 234–38Google Scholar.
4 Bristow, Nancy K., “‘It’s as Bad as Anything Can Be’: Patients, Identity, and the Influenza Pandemic,” Public Health Reports 125 (Apr. 2010): 136 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.
5 Bristow, Nancy K., American Pandemic: The Lost Worlds of the 1918 Influenza Epidemic (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017)Google Scholar; Crosby, America’s Forgotten Pandemic, 323–25; Outka, Elizabeth, Viral Modernism: The Influenza Pandemic and Interwar Literature (New York: Columbia University Press, 2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
6 Velde, François R., “What Happened to the U.S. Economy during the 1918 Influenza Pandemic? A View Through High-Frequency Data,” Journal of Economic History 82 (Mar. 2022): 284–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Prior to the current pandemic, economic historians had not concerned themselves with the non-occurrence of a crisis in 1918. Researchers concentrated instead on the flu’s effects on children in utero. See Almond, Douglas, “Is the 1918 Influenza Pandemic Over? Long-Term Effects of In Utero Influenza Exposure in the Post-1940 U.S. Population,” Journal of Political Economy 114 (Aug. 2006): 672–712 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Douglas Almond and Bhashkar Mazumder, “The 1918 Influenza Pandemic and Subsequent Health Outcomes: An Analysis of SIPP Data,” American Economic Review 95 (May 2005): 258–62.
7 Beach, Brian, Clay, Karen, and Saavedra, Martin, “The 1918 Influenza Pandemic and Its Lessons for COVID-19,” Journal of Economic Literature 60 (Mar. 2022): 65CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
8 Recent scholarship has neglected the effect of the level of output on the composition of consumer demand. An exception is Navarro, J. Alexander and Markel, Howard, “Politics, Pushback, and Pandemics: Challenges to Public Health Orders in the 1918 Influenza Pandemic,” American Journal of Public Health 111 (Mar. 2021): 420 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.
9 Jacobs, Martin, “Accounting for Changing Tastes: Approaches to Explaining Unstable Individual Preferences,” Jahrbuch für Wirtschaftswissenschaften 67 (Aug. 2016): 121–83Google Scholar; Lebergott, Stanley, Pursuing Happiness: American Consumers in the Twentieth Century (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993)Google Scholar; Taylor, Lester D. and Houthakker, Hendrik S., Consumer Demand in the United States: Prices, Income, and Consumption Behavior, 3rd ed. (New York: Springer, 2010), 47 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
10 Robbins, Lionel, An Essay on the Nature & Significance of Economic Science, 2nd ed. (London: Macmillan, 1935)Google Scholar.
11 Galbraith, John Kenneth, The Affluent Society, 4th ed. (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1984), 131 Google Scholar.
12 Stigler, George J. and Becker, Gary S., “De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum,” American Economic Review 67 (Mar. 1977): 76–90 Google Scholar.
13 Marx, Karl, Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, trans. Fowkes, Ben, vol. 1 (New York: Penguin, 1990), 275 Google Scholar. Marx shared this understanding of human needs with other political economists in the classical tradition, including Smith, Adam, An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, ed. Cannan, Edwin, vol. 2 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976), 399–400 Google Scholar. See also Friedman, Benjamin M., The Moral Consequences of Economic Growth (New York: Knopf, 2005)Google Scholar.
14 For the anthropological literature, see Graeber, David, Toward an Anthropological Theory of Value: The False Coin of Our Own Dreams (New York: Palgrave, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sahlins, Marshall, Stone Age Economics (Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Suzman, James, Affluence without Abundance: The Disappearing World of the Bushmen (New York: Bloomsbury, 2017)Google Scholar.
15 Horowitz, Daniel, The Morality of Spending: Attitudes toward the Consumer Society in America, 1875–1940 (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1985), xxGoogle Scholar.
16 Baruch, Bernard M., American Industry in the War: A Report of the War Industries Board (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1921), 7Google Scholar.
17 Bootsma, Martin C. J. and Ferguson, Neil M., “The Effect of Public Health Measures on the 1918 Influenza Pandemic in U.S. Cities,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104 (May 2007): 7588–93CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Hatchett, Richard J., Mecher, Carter E., and Lipsitch, Marc, “Public Health Interventions and Epidemic Intensity during the 1918 Influenza Pandemic,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104 (May 2007): 7582–87CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Markel, Howard et al., “Nonpharmaceutical Interventions Implemented by US Cities During the 1918-1919 Influenza Pandemic,” JAMA 298 (Aug. 2007): 644–54CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Nichols, Christopher McKnight et al., “Reconsidering the 1918–19 Influenza Pandemic in the Age of COVID-19,” Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era 19 (Oct. 2020): 658–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
18 Correia, Sergio, Luck, Stephan, and Verner, Emil, “Pandemics Depress the Economy, Public Health Interventions Do Not: Evidence from the 1918 Flu,” Journal of Economic History 82 (Dec. 2022): 917–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
19 Horowitz, Morality of Spending, 122.
20 Oregonian (Portland), Oct. 12, 1918.
21 Kansas City Star (Missouri), Oct. 17, 1918.
22 Gordon, Robert J., The Rise and Fall of American Growth: The U.S. Standard of Living Since the Civil War (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, fig. 16.5.
23 DeLong, J. Bradford, Slouching towards Utopia: An Economic History of the Twentieth Century (New York: Basic Books, 2022)Google Scholar; Goldin, Claudia and Katz, Lawrence F., “The Origins of Technology-Skill Complementarity,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 113 (Aug. 1998): 693–732 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Livingston, James, Pragmatism and the Political Economy of Cultural Revolution, 1850-1940 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1994), 69 Google Scholar.
24 Abramovitz, Moses, “The Search for the Sources of Growth: Areas of Ignorance, Old and New,” Journal of Economic History 53 (June 1993): 217–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
25 Bernstein, Michael A., “Why the Great Depression Was Great: Toward a New Understanding of the Interwar Economic Crisis in the United States,” in The Rise and Fall of the New Deal Order 1930–1980, ed. Fraser, Steve and Gerstle, Gary (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1989), 39 Google Scholar.
26 Chandler, Alfred D., The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1977)Google Scholar.
27 Calder, Lendol, Financing the American Dream: A Cultural History of Consumer Credit (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009)Google Scholar; Olney, Martha L., Buy Now, Pay Later: Advertising, Credit, and Consumer Durables in the 1920s (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1991)Google Scholar.
28 Livingston, Political Economy, 105–7.
29 McGovern, Charles F., Sold American: Consumption and Citizenship, 1890–1945 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
30 Horowitz, Morality of Spending, 122, 129.
31 U.S. Department of Labor, Cost of Living in the United States, Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics 357 (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1924).
32 Jacobs, Eva and Shipp, Stephanie, “How Family Spending Has Changed in the U.S.,” Monthly Labor Review 113 (Mar. 1990): 23 Google ScholarPubMed.
33 Rosenzweig, Roy, Eight Hours for What We Will: Workers and Leisure in an Industrial City, 1870–1920 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983), 195 Google Scholar.
34 Peiss, Kathy Lee, Cheap Amusements: Working Women and Leisure in Turn-of-the-Century New York (Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 1986), 150 Google Scholar.
35 Horowitz, Morality of Spending, app. C.
36 Burns, Arthur F. and Mitchell, Wesley C., Measuring Business Cycles (New York: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1946), 109 Google Scholar.
37 Friedman, Milton and Schwartz, Anna Jacobson, A Monetary History of the United States, 1867–1960 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008), 222 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
38 Bradstreet’s, Nov. 2, 1918.
39 Velde, “1918 Influenza Pandemic,” 287.
40 This figure is the sum of management, business, science, and arts; service; and sales and office occupations according to the 2016–2020 American Community Survey. Percentages are of the total labor force, including agriculture and government.
41 U.S. Department of Labor, Fluctuation in Employment in Ohio, 1914 to 1929, Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics 553 (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1932).
42 Livingston, Political Economy, 25–31; Schneirov, Richard, “Thoughts on Periodizing the Gilded Age: Capital Accumulation, Society, and Politics, 1873–1898,” Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era 5 (July 2006): 197, 204CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
43 Glickman, Lawrence B., A Living Wage: American Workers and the Making of Consumer Society (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2015)Google Scholar.
44 Frank, Dana, Purchasing Power: Consumer Organizing, Gender, and the Seattle Labor Movement, 1919–1929 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994)Google Scholar; Jacobs, Meg, Pocketbook Politics: Economic Citizenship in Twentieth-Century America (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005)Google Scholar.
45 Glickman, Lawrence B., Buying Power: A History of Consumer Activism in America (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009), 163–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
46 Cohen, Lizabeth, A Consumer’s Republic: The Politics of Mass Consumption in Postwar America (New York: Vintage, 2004)Google Scholar, chapt. 4; Ownby, Ted, American Dreams in Mississippi: Consumers, Poverty & Culture, 1830–1998 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1999)Google Scholar; Wolcott, Victoria W., Race, Riots, and Roller Coasters: The Struggle over Segregated Recreation in America (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
47 Currarino, Rosanne, The Labor Question in America: Economic Democracy in the Gilded Age (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2010)Google Scholar, chapt. 2; Glickman, Living Wage, 85–90.
48 Rauchway, Eric, “The High Cost of Living in the Progressives’ Economy,” Journal of American History 88 (Dec. 2001): 898–924 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Stapleford, Thomas A., The Cost of Living in America: A Political History of Economic Statistics, 1880–2000 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009)Google Scholar.
49 Horowitz, Morality of Spending, 59–60, 120–24.
50 Eugene Grace, “Distributed Property,” Saturday Evening Post, Sept. 4, 1926; quoted by Jacobs, Pocketbook Politics, 87.
51 Mitchell, John, Organized Labor: Its Problems, Purposes, and Ideals and the Present and Future of American Wage Earners (Philadelphia, PA: American Book and Bible House, 1903), 115–16Google Scholar.
52 Royal Meeker, “What Is the American Standard of Living?” Monthly Labor Review 9 (July 1919): 6.
53 Tooze, J. Adam, The Deluge: The Great War, America, and the Remaking of the Global Order, 1916–1931 (New York: Penguin, 2015), 217 Google Scholar.
54 Beach, Clay, and Saavedra, “1918 Influenza Pandemic,” 66.
55 Oregonian, Oct. 18, 1918. “Governmental restrictions on less essential industries have improved the supply of labor for the most pressing work,” reported Bradstreet’s on Oct. 12, 1918.
56 Karlsson, Martin, Nilsson, Therese, and Pichler, Stefan, “The Impact of the 1918 Spanish Flu Epidemic on Economic Performance in Sweden: An Investigation into the Consequences of an Extraordinary Mortality Shock,” Journal of Health Economics 36 (July 2014): 1–19 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.
57 Basco, Sergi, Domènech, Jordi, and Rosés, Joan R., “The Redistributive Effects of Pandemics: Evidence on the Spanish Flu,” World Development 141 (May 2021): art. 105389 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed. Galletta, Compare Sergio and Giommoni, Tommaso, “The Effect of the 1918 Influenza Pandemic on Income Inequality: Evidence from Italy,” Review of Economics and Statistics 104 (Jan. 2022): 187–203 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
58 Tooze, Deluge, 216.
59 Tooze, 355; Martin, Jamie, “Globalizing the History of the First World War: Economic Approaches,” The Historical Journal 65 (June 2022): 846 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
60 Hawley, Ellis Wayne, The Great War and the Search for a Modern Order: A History of the American People and Their Institutions, 1917–1933, 2nd ed. (Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press, 1997)Google Scholar; Kennedy, David M., Over Here: The First World War and American Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982)Google Scholar.
61 Baruch, American Industry, 18.
62 Jacobs, Pocketbook Politics, 56–61.
63 Baruch, American Industry, 6–7.
64 Hower, Ralph M., History of Macy’s of New York, 1853–1919: Chapters in the Evolution of the Department Store (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1943), 380–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
65 Bradstreet’s, Feb. 23, 1918.
66 Boston Daily Globe, May 24, 1918.
67 Atlanta Constitution, September 20, 1918.
68 Robertson, John Dill and Koehler, Gottfried, “Preliminary Report on the Influenza Epidemic in Chicago,” American Journal of Public Health 8 (Nov. 1918): 855 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.
69 Des Moines Daily News, Oct. 10, 1918
70 Courier-Journal (Louisville, KY), Oct. 10, 1918.
71 Spokane Daily Chronicle, Dec. 7, 1918.
72 Boston Daily Globe, Oct. 6, 1918.
73 Burg, Steven, “Wisconsin and the Great Spanish Flu Epidemic of 1918,” Wisconsin Magazine of History 84 (Autumn 2000): 52 Google ScholarPubMed.
74 Lowell Courier-Citizen (Massachusetts), Oct. 7, 1918.
75 Crosby, America’s Forgotten Pandemic, 79.
76 “Report on Organization and Activities of State Councils of Defense” (Washington, DC: Council of National Defense, 1917), 5, https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/102679588 (accessed Jan. 19, 2022).
77 Breen, W. J., Uncle Sam at Home: Civilian Mobilization, Wartime Federalism, and the Council of National Defense, 1917–1919 (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1984)Google Scholar; Kennedy, Over Here, 115.
78 “Report on Organization and Activities,” 9.
79 Idaho Statesman, Nov. 10, 1918 and Nov. 15, 1918.
80 Idaho Falls Times, Nov. 21, 1918; Idaho Statesman, Nov. 10, 1918, Nov. 15, 1918, and Nov. 16, 1918.
81 Beach, Clay, and Saavedra, “1918 Influenza Pandemic,” 41; Correia, Luck, and Verner, “Pandemics Depress the Economy,” 920; Mark Hulbert, “Lessons from the Previous Pandemic,” The Wall Street Journal, Sept. 8, 2020.
82 Velde, “1918 Influenza Pandemic,” 322.
83 Balogh, Brian, The Associational State: American Governance in the Twentieth Century (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Barreyre, Nicolas and Lemercier, Claire, “The Unexceptional State: Rethinking the State in the Nineteenth Century (France, United States),” American Historical Review 126 (Sept. 2021): 481–503 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; John, Richard R., “The State Is Back In: What Now?” Journal of the Early Republic 38 (Spring 2018): 105–18Google Scholar; McGirr, Lisa, The War on Alcohol: Prohibition and the Rise of the American State (New York: W.W. Norton, 2016)Google Scholar; Novak, William J., “Institutional Economics and the Progressive Movement for the Social Control of American Business,” Business History Review 93 (Winter 2019): 665–96Google Scholar; Novak, William J., “The Myth of the ‘Weak’ American State,” American Historical Review 113 (June 2008): 752–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
84 Baruch, American Industry, 18.
85 Colbrook, Stephen, “Why Pandemics Matter to the History of U.S. State Development,” Modern American History 4 (Nov. 2021): 315–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
86 Jones, Esyllt W., Influenza 1918: Disease, Death, and Struggle in Winnipeg (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2008), 40 Google Scholar.
87 Arnon, Alexander, Ricco, John, and Smetters, Kent, “Epidemiological and Economic Effects of Lockdown,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (Fall 2020): 61–99 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
88 Baek, ChaeWon et al., “Unemployment Effects of Stay-at-Home Orders: Evidence from High-Frequency Claims Data,” Review of Economics and Statistics 103 (Nov. 2021): 979–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
89 Tooze, Adam, Shutdown: How Covid Shook the World’s Economy (New York: Penguin, 2021)Google Scholar.
90 Link, Stefan and Maggor, Noam, “The United States as a Developing Nation: Revisiting the Peculiarities of American History,” Past & Present 246 (Feb. 2020): 269–306 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
91 Navarro and Markel, “Politics, Pushback, and Pandemics,” 420; Nichols, Christopher McKnight et al., “What Came Next? Reflections on the Aftermath(s) of the 1918–19 Flu Pandemic in the Age of COVID,” Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era 21 (Apr. 2022): 112 Google Scholar.
92 Meeker, “What Is the American Standard of Living?” 6.
93 Des Moines Daily News, Oct. 10, 1918.
94 U.S. Department of Labor, Fluctuation in Employment in Ohio, 28.
95 Bradstreet’s, Oct. 26, 1918.
96 Wall Street Journal, Oct. 28, 1918
97 Lowell Courier-Citizen (Massachusetts), Oct. 7, 1918.
98 Crosby, America’s Forgotten Pandemic, 81.
99 Oakland Tribune, Oct. 24, 1918.
100 Fall River Evening Herald (Massachusetts), Oct. 25, 1918.
101 Kansas City Star, Oct. 17, 1918.
102 Jones, Influenza 1918, 110. See also Milwaukee Journal, Oct. 24, 1918; Deseret Evening News, Nov. 28, 1918.
103 Oregonian, Oct. 12, 1918 and Oct. 26, 1918.
104 Burg, “Wisconsin,” 45; Horowitz, Morality of Spending, 115; Spinney, Pale Rider, 101.
105 Oregonian, Oct. 12, 1918.
106 Omaha World Herald, Oct. 27, 1918.
107 Jacobs, Pocketbook Politics, 19; Rabinovitz, Lauren, For the Love of Pleasure: Women, Movies, and Culture in Turn-of-the-Century Chicago (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1998), 69 Google Scholar.
108 Wall Street Journal, Nov. 9, 1918.
109 Velde, “1918 Influenza Pandemic,” 299. Velde finds that in 1918, an increase in mail-order sales partially compensated for slow business in stores. For comparison, sales-tax receipts show that revenues for retailers of clothing and accessories in California declined 54 percent, year over year, in the second quarter of 2020, according to Fairlie, Robert and Fossen, Frank M., “The Early Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Business Sales,” Small Business Economics 58 (Apr. 2022): 1853–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
110 Birmingham News, Oct. 31, 1918.
111 Baruch, American Industry, 387.
112 Meeker, “What Is the American Standard of Living?” 6.
113 Jones, Influenza 1918, 148.
114 Williams, Faith M., “Clothing and Personal Care,” in How American Buying Habits Change, U.S. Department of Labor (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1959), 139 Google Scholar.
115 Chapin, Robert Coit, The Standard of Living Among Workingmen’s Families in New York City (New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1909), 165–68Google Scholar.
116 Enstad, Nan, Ladies of Labor, Girls of Adventure: Working Women, Popular Culture, and Labor Politics at the Turn of the Twentieth Century (New York: Columbia University Press, 1999), 141–45Google Scholar; Glickman, Living Wage, chapt. 2.
117 Horowitz, Morality of Spending, 65.
118 Worcester, Wood F. and Worcester, Daisy Worthington, Family Budgets of Typical Cotton-Mill Workers (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1911), 137–39Google Scholar.
119 Williams, “Clothing and Personal Care,” 127–33; Gordon, Rise and Fall, 85–87.
120 Enstad, Ladies of Labor, chapt. 5; McGovern, Sold American, 36–48.
121 Meeker, “What Is the American Standard of Living?” 6.
122 Wall Street Journal, Oct. 21, 1918, Oct. 24, 1918, Oct. 25, 1918, Oct. 26, 1918, Oct. 28, 1918, and Dec. 2, 1918. On coal, see Velde, “1918 Influenza Pandemic,” 304–7.
123 Bradstreet’s, Dec. 28, 1918.
124 Bouk, Daniel B., How Our Days Became Numbered: Risk and the Rise of the Statistical Individual (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015), 197–207 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Lakshmi Krishnan, S. Michelle Ogunwole, and Lisa A. Cooper, “Historical Insights on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), the 1918 Influenza Pandemic, and Racial Disparities: Illuminating a Path Forward,” Annals of Internal Medicine 173 (Sept. 2020): 474–81.
125 Kantor, Shawn Everett and Fishback, Price V., “Precautionary Saving, Insurance, and the Origins of Workers’ Compensation,” Journal of Political Economy 104 (Apr. 1996): 425 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
126 Rosenow, Michael K., Death and Dying in the Working Class, 1865–1920 (Champaign: University of Illinois Press, 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Zelizer, Viviana A. Rotman, Morals and Markets: The Development of Life Insurance in the United States (New York: Columbia University Press, 2018)Google Scholar.
127 Jones, Influenza 1918, 93–94.
128 Montgomery, David, The Fall of the House of Labor: The Workplace, the State, and American Labor Activism, 1865–1925 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987), 388 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also McCartin, Joseph Anthony, Labor’s Great War: The Struggle for Industrial Democracy and the Origins of Modern American Labor Relations, 1912–1921 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1997)Google Scholar.
129 Corbin, David, Life, Work, and Rebellion in the Coal Fields: The Southern West Virginia Miners, 1880-1922, 2nd ed. (Morgantown: West Virginia University Press, 2015)Google Scholar.
130 Frank, Purchasing Power, 34–39.
131 Jones, Influenza 1918, 115–16, 170–72.
132 Albert W. Atwood, “Are We Extravagant?” Saturday Evening Post, Jan. 3, 1920, 116; quoted by Horowitz, Morality of Spending, 126.
133 Friedman and Schwartz, Monetary History, 223.
134 Friedman and Schwartz, 227–28.
135 Eichengreen, Barry, Golden Fetters: The Gold Standard and the Great Depression, 1919–1939 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
136 Friedman and Schwartz, Monetary History, 239.
137 Montgomery, The Fall of the House of Labor, 407.
138 Gordon, Linda, The Second Coming of the KKK: The Ku Klux Klan of the 1920s and the American Political Tradition (New York: Liveright, 2017), 163–71Google Scholar; MacLean, Nancy, Behind the Mask of Chivalry: The Making of the Second Ku Klux Klan (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994), 45 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Pearson, Chad E., Capital’s Terrorists: Klansmen, Lawmen, and Employers in the Long Nineteenth Century (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2022)Google Scholar.
139 Tooze, Deluge, 354.
140 Jedwab, Remi, Johnson, Noel D., and Koyama, Mark, “The Economic Impact of the Black Death,” Journal of Economic Literature 60 (Mar. 2022): 132–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Jordà, Òscar, Singh, Sanjay R., and Taylor, Alan M., “Longer-Run Economic Consequences of Pandemics,” Review of Economics and Statistics 104 (Jan. 2022): 166–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
141 Beach, Clay, and Saavedra, “1918 Influenza Pandemic,” 66–67; Garrett, Thomas A., “War and Pestilence as Labor Market Shocks: U.S. Manufacturing Wage Growth 1914–1919,” Economic Inquiry 47 (Oct. 2009): 711–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
142 Brinkley, Alan, The End of Reform: New Deal Liberalism in Recession and War (New York: Vintage, 1996), 67–72 Google Scholar; Donohue, Kathleen G., Freedom from Want: American Liberalism and the Idea of the Consumer (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003)Google Scholar; Jacobs, Pocketbook Politics, 75–92.
143 Sklar, Martin J., The United States as a Developing Country: Studies in U.S. History in the Progressive Era and the 1920s (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992), 153–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
144 Marx, Capital, 325.
145 Cauvel, Michael and Pacitti, Aaron, “Bargaining Power, Structural Change, and the Falling U.S. Labor Share,” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 60 (Mar. 2022): 512–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mian, Atif, Straub, Ludwig, and Sufi, Amir, “Indebted Demand,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 136 (Nov. 2021): 2243–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar.