Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T14:36:37.423Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

51 Importance of Using Baseline Verbal Abilities When Interpreting the MOCA Test Performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2023

Se Yun (Jacqueline) Kim*
Affiliation:
Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
Caroline Altaras
Affiliation:
Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
Margaret O’Connor
Affiliation:
Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
*
Correspondence: Kim, Se Yun (Jacqueline), Brigham and Women’s Hospital, skim121@mgh.harvard.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) is widely used as a mental status screening test to detect cognitive impairment in adults over 55 years of age. Performance on this test ranges from 0 to 30. One point is given to individuals with 12 or lower years of education. This accommodation is based on the fact that low education may be a risk factor for dementia (Milani et al., 2018). However, studies suggest the one-point adjustment may not be sufficient to address the impact of low education on test performance (Malek-Ahmadi et al., 2015). The aim of this study is to compare the effects of educational achievement versus baseline verbal abilities on MOCA performance.

Participants and Methods:

Fifty patients (25 male; mean age=72.78, SD = 8.11; mean education=16.18, SD = 2.73) with cognitive concerns were referred to Massachusetts General Brigham. All underwent neuropsychological evaluation, including screening with the MOCA. Total MOCA scores were calculated. In this patient group, the MOCA scores ranged from 10 to 29 (mean=22, SD=5.129). Measures of literacy (Wechsler Test of Adult Reading or Test of Premorbid Functioning) were used to estimate baseline verbal abilities. Educational achievement was based on self-reported years of education.

Results:

Correlational analyses included the Total MOCA scores, measures of literacy, and years of education. Performance on the MOCA significantly correlated with measures of literacy, r(43)=.578, p< .001, and a stepwise regression analysis revealed that literacy predicted performance on the MOCA, R2=.041, F(3,139)= 9.172, p<.001. Years of education correlated with measures of literacy, r(44)=.494, p< .001, but not with performance on the MOCA.

Conclusions:

Findings suggest that education-adjusted scoring on the MOCA may not be sufficient to “level the playing field” in terms of MOCA performance. Years of education had less of an effect on the Total MOCA scores than did baseline verbal abilities. It may be the case that literacy has a more robust effect on MOCA performance due to the inherent verbal nature of the MOCA. Data from this study highlight the importance of considering a patient’s baseline verbal abilities in the interpretation of their MOCA performance.

Type
Poster Session 08: Assessment | Psychometrics | Noncredible Presentations | Forensic
Copyright
Copyright © INS. Published by Cambridge University Press, 2023