Cognitive function may underlie the use of more adaptive as compared to maladaptive coping strategies to manage pandemic-related stress in older adults. As the composition of coping strategies varies with context, we investigated the factor structure of 14 established coping strategies. We then aimed to determine whether specific coping strategies were associated with cognitive function.

141 adults aged 50-90 years old completed the study via Zoom. The National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center TCog battery assessed cognitive function. The Brief Cope, adapted to evaluate COVID-19, measured 14 specific coping strategies.

Based on our factor analyses, Avoidant (e.g., denial and substance use) and Approach (e.g., planning, instrumental and emotional support systems) coping composite scores were formed. Regression analyses, adjusted for age and education, indicated that 12.9% of the variance in the use of Avoidance coping strategies was explained by worse performance on measures of episodic memory, executive attention/processing speed, working memory, and verbal fluency. A closer examination indicated that verbal fluency was not a statistically significant contributor to the model. 9.1% of the variance in Approach coping strategies was related to cognitive function with working memory and verbal fluency being statistically significant contributors to the model.

Older adults with better performance on higher-order cognitive testing may utilize more effective coping strategies in older adults. These results have implications for attenuating pandemic-related stress and warrant developing brief interventions to help facilitate problem-solving and reduce emotional distress in those with lower cognitive resources.