Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-10T12:48:03.090Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Production Effect in Adults With ADHD With and Without Methylphenidate (MPH): Vocalization Improves Verbal Learning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2018

Yaniv Mama  and
Michal Icht
Yaniv Mama*
Affiliation:
Ariel University, Israel
Michal Icht
Affiliation:
Ariel University, Israel
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to: Yaniv Mama, Department of Behavioral Science and Psychology, Ariel University 40700, Israel. E-mail: yanivma@ariel.ac.il
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives: Reading aloud (vocal production) enhances memory relative to reading silently, the Production Effect (PE) in memory. Thus, vocalization has been suggested as a mnemonic device. The current study tested the PE in a sample of adults with ADHD and in a control sample, evaluating verbal learning. Methods: Twenty adults with ADHD and 21 controls learned a list of words, half by reading aloud and half by reading silently. Free recall test followed. The participants with ADHD performed the task twice (in two different sessions in a counterbalanced order), before self-administration of a single dose of methylphenidate (MPH) and 60-min after dosage. Results: PEs were found for all groups. Memory was better for the controls than for the ADHD group (with or without MPH). In the ADHD group, recall rates and the PE were higher with than without MPH. Conclusions: These results suggest that vocalization yields a larger memory gain with MPH. Possibly, MPH enables the ADHD participants to better shift their attention to the aloud words, enhancing their retrieval rates. Theoretically, these findings stress the role of attention in the PE. (JINS, 2019, 25, 230–235)

Keywords

ADHDthe Production EffectLong-term memoryVerbal learningMethylphenidate (MPH)Attentional processes
Type
Brief Communication
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , February 2019 , pp. 230 - 235
Copyright
Copyright © The International Neuropsychological Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Asherson, P. (2005). Clinical assessment and treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in adults. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics, 5(4), 525–539.Google Scholar
Barkley, R.A. (2014). History of ADHD. In R. Barkley (Ed.), Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A handbook for diagnosis and treatment (pp. 3–50). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Cahn, D.A., & Marcotte, A.C. (1995). Rates of forgetting in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Child Neuropsychology, 1, 158–163.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, S.R., Del Campo, N., Dowson, J., Müller, U., Clark, L., Robbins, T.W., & Sahakian, B.J. (2007). Atomoxetine improved response inhibition in adults with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Biological psychiatry, 62(9), 977–984.Google Scholar
Chan, J.C., McDermott, K.B., & Roediger, H.L. III. (2006). Retrieval-induced facilitation: Initially nontested material can benefit from prior testing of related material. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(4), 553.Google Scholar
Douglas, V.I., & Benezra, E. (1990). Supraspan verbal memory in attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity normal and reading-disabled boys. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 18(6), 617–638 Google Scholar
Egeland, J., Nordby Johansen, S., & Ueland, T. (2010). Do low-effort learning strategies mediate impaired memory in ADHD? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 430–440.Google Scholar
Fawcett, J.M. (2013). The production effect benefits performance in between-subject designs: A meta-analysis. Acta Psychologica, 142(1), 1–5.Google Scholar
Forrin, N.D., MacLeod, C.M., & Ozubko, J.D. (2012). Widening the boundaries of the production effect. Memory and Cognition, 40(7), 1046–1055.Google Scholar
Fuermaier, A.B., Tucha, L., Koerts, J., Weisbrod, M., Lange, K.W., Aschenbrenner, S., & Tucha, O. (2017). Effects of methylphenidate on memory functions of adults with ADHD. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 24(3), 199–211.Google Scholar
Greenberg, L.M., & Waldman, I.D. (1993). Developmental normative data on the test of variables of attention (T.O.V.A.). Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 34(6), 1019–1030.Google Scholar
Icht, M., Bergerzon-Biton, O., & Mama, Y. (2016). The production effect in adults with dysarthria: Improving long-term verbal memory by vocal production. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 29, 1–13.Google Scholar
Icht, M., & Mama, Y. (2015). The production effect in memory: A prominent mnemonic in children. Journal of Child Language, 42(05), 1102–1124.Google Scholar
Icht, M., Mama, Y., & Algom, D. (2014). The production effect in memory: Multiple species of distinctiveness. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 886.Google Scholar
Kessler, R.C., Adler, L., Ames, M., Demler, O., Faraone, S., Hiripi, E.V.A., . . . Ustun, T.B. (2005). The World Health Organization Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS): A short screening scale for use in the general population. Psychological Medicine, 35(2), 245–256.Google Scholar
MacDonald, P.A., & MacLeod, C.M. (1998). The influence of attention at encoding on direct and indirect remembering. Acta Psychologica, 98, 291–310.Google Scholar
MacLeod, C.M., Gopie, N., Hourihan, K.L., Neary, K.R., & Ozubko, J.D. (2010). The production effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(3), 671–685.Google Scholar
Mama, Y., Fostick, L., & Icht, M. (2018). The impact of different background noises on the production effect. Acta Psychologica, 185, 235–242.Google Scholar
Mama, Y., & Icht, M. (2016a). Auditioning the distinctiveness account: Expanding the production effect to the auditory modality reveals the superiority of writing over vocalising. Memory, 24(1), 98–113.Google Scholar
Mama, Y., & Icht, M. (2016b). The influence of retrieval mode on the effects of production: Evidence for costs in free recall. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(2), 177–185.Google Scholar
O’Neill, M.E., & Douglas, V.I. (1996). Rehearsal strategies and recall performance in boys with and without attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 21(1), 73–88.Google Scholar
Ozubko, J.D., Hourihan, K.L., & MacLeod, C.M. (2012). Production benefits learning: The production effect endures and improves memory for text. Memory, 20, 717–727.Google Scholar
Pollak, Y., Kahana-Vax, G., & Hoofien, D. (2008). Retrieval processes in adults with ADHD: A RAVLT study. Developmental Neuropsychology, 33, 62–73.Google Scholar
Qian, D.D. (1996). ESL vocabulary acquisition: Contextualization and des contextualization. Modern Language Review, 53, 120–142.Google Scholar
Sigi Hale, T., Bookheimer, S., McGough, J.J., Phillips, J.M., & McCracken, J.T. (2007). Atypical brain activation during simple & complex levels of processing in adult ADHD: An fMRI study. Journal of Attention Disorders, 11(2), 125–139.Google Scholar
Skodzik, T., Holling, H., & Pedersen, A. (2017). Long-term memory performance in adult ADHD: A meta-analysis. Journal of attention disorders, 21(4), 267–283.Google Scholar
Spronk, M., Vogel, E.K., & Jonkman, L.M. (2013). No behavioral or ERP evidence for a developmental lag in visual working memory capacity or filtering in adolescents and adults with ADHD. PLoS One, 8(5), e62673.Google Scholar
Taitelbaum-Swead, R., Icht, M., & Mama, Y. (2017). The effect of learning modality and auditory feedback on word memory: Cochlear-implanted versus normal-hearing adults. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 28(3), 222–231.Google Scholar
Taitelbaum-Swead, R., Mama, Y., & Icht, M. (2018). The effect of presentation mode and production type on word memory for hearing impaired signers. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.Google Scholar
Verhaeghen, P., Marcoen, A., & Goossens, L. (1992). Improving memory performance in the aged through mnemonic training: A meta-analytic study. Psychology and Aging, 7, 242–251.Google Scholar
Volkow, N.D., Wang, G.J., Fowler, J.S., Telang, F., Maynard, L., Logan, J., ... Zhu, W. (2004). Evidence that methylphenidate enhances the saliency of a mathematical task by increasing dopamine in the human brain. American Journal of Psychiatry, 161(7), 1173–1180.Google Scholar