Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-11T01:50:08.474Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Use of Cuprous Oxide and other Rectifier Photo Cells in Submarine Photometry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

W. R. G. Atkins
Affiliation:
Head of the Department of General Physiology at the Plymouth Laboratory
H. H. Poole
Affiliation:
Registrar of the Royal Dublin Society

Extract

1. Photo-electric cells of the rectifier type are useful for approximate measurements of light intensity, in air or under water, using a lowresistance galvanometer, the current through which may be reduced by a special shunt keeping the circuit resistance constant.

2. Such an arrangement has proved serviceable for shore work, a light gun-metal photometer, housing a cuprous oxide cell, having been carried about by a diver.

3. These rectifier cells can also be used at sea, but instead of the current, the E.M.F. is determined by means of the potentiometer outfit as used at sea in previous years.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1933

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Atkins, W. R. G., and Poole, H. H. 1933, a. The photo-electric measurement of the penetration of light of various wave-lengths into the sea and the physiological bearing of the results. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc, London, Series B, 222, pp. 129164.Google Scholar
Bergmann, L. 1931. Über eine neue Selen-Sperrschicht-Photozelle. Physik. Zeitschr., 32, pp. 286288.Google Scholar
Lange, B. 1930. Über eine neue Art von Photozellen. Physik. Zeitschr., 31, pp. 139140.Google Scholar
Poole, H. H., and Atkins, W. R. G. 1933, b. Some experiments on the suitability of rectifier photo cells for the measurement of daylight. Sci. Proc. Roy. Dublin Soc, 20, pp. 537546.Google Scholar