No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Tapeh Tyalineh: a proto-Elamite administrative institution on the Great Khorasan Road, Kermanshah, Western Iran
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 May 2023
Abstract
The Mahidasht region is a vital cultural sphere on the Great Khorasan Road that has provided substantial evidence for administrative activity, which is considered to be an indicator of economic and political complexity in late prehistoric societies. This article discusses a corpus of bureaucratic artefacts from the site of Tapeh Tyalineh in the Kouzaran plain in the north of Mahidasht, including 52 jar sealings and 12 door sealings. The artefacts were found during the recent surveys conducted by two of the authors at Tapeh Tyalineh after reports were received of illegal diggings at the site by villagers who had used its soil to plaster the roofs of their houses and to level and cultivate their farmland. Tyalineh seal impressions are studied here in terms of style and iconography in order to date the corpus of administrative artefacts. Furthermore, applying a functionalist approach, the artefacts are examined to answer questions regarding the nature and function of the site. The results suggest that the corpus dates to the proto-Elamite era. The significance of the door sealings, as the most important artefact type from Tyalineh, is that at least a part of the site was devoted to administrative affairs, which probably involved holding certain commodities in rather small closed-mouthed jars and then securing them behind locked doors. The administrative technology not only at Tyalineh but also at Chogha Maran and Dehsavar in Mahidasht and Godin VI:1 in Kangavar attest to well-established Early Bronze Age administrative and economic institutions along the Khorasan Road in the Central Zagros, which were involved in interregional commercial interactions.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Royal Asiatic Society
References
1 Levine, L. D., ‘Archaeological investigations in the Mahidasht, Western Iran-1975’, Paléorient 2.2 (1974), pp. 487–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar; L. D. Levine, ‘Survey in the province of Kermanshah, 1975, Mahidasht in the prehistoric and early historic periods’, in Proceedings of the 4th Annual Symposium on Archaeological Research in Iran, (ed.) F. Bagherzadeh (Tehran, 1976), p. 286; Manhoubi, S., ‘The archaeology of the Mahidasht region’ [in Persian], in Eighty Years of Iranian Archaeology, (eds) Y. Hassanzadeh and S. Miri (Tehran, 2012), p. 367Google Scholar.
2 Levine, ‘Survey in the province of Kermanshah’, p. 290.
3 Steve Renette, ‘Along the Mountain Passes: Tracing Indigenous Developments of Social Complexity in the Zagros Region During the Early Bronze Age (ca. 3500–2000 BCE)’, (unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, 2018), pp. 135–136, 316–320.
4 Pollock, S., Bernbeck, R. and Kainert, Ch., ‘Seal and sealings from Dehsavar’, in Pathway through Arslantepe. Essays in Honour of Marcella Frangipane, (eds) F. Balossi Restelli, A. Cardarelli, G. M. Di Nocera, L. Manzanilla, L. Mori, G. Palumbi and H. Pittman (Roma, 2020), pp. 379–389Google Scholar.
5 Khayani, A. and Niknami, K., ‘Early Bronze Age administrative organization at Chogha Maran, the Mahidasht: a hypothesis’ [in Persian], Journal of Archaeological Studies 11.2 (2019), pp. 97–116Google Scholar; Khayani, A. and Niknami, K., ‘Early Bronze Age clay sealings from Chogha Maran, the West Central Zagros: a preliminary analysis’, Journal of Near Eastern Studies 79.1 (2020), pp. 89–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar; A. Khayani and K. Niknami, ‘More Early Bronze Age seal impressions from Choga Maran, Western Central Zagros’, IRAN (in press), doi: 10.1080/05786967.2020.1847000.
6 Pollock et al., ‘Seal and sealings’, pp. 379–389; H. Pittman, ‘Chogah Maran in the Central Zagros: the glyptic art of the Early Bronze’, in Proceedings of the 8th International Congress on the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East, 30 April–4 May 2012. Vol. ii, Excavation and Progress Reports Poster, (eds) P. Bieliński, M. Gawlikowski, R. Koliński, D. Ławecka, A. Sołtysiak and Z. Wygnańska (Wiesbaden, 2014), pp. 367–382; Renette, ‘Along the mountain passes’; Khayani and Niknami, ‘Early Bronze Age’; Renette, S., Khayani, A. and Levine, L. D., ‘Chogha Maran: a local center of the Chalcolithic and Early Bronze Age in the central Zagros’, Iranica Antiqua 56 (2021), pp. 1–169Google Scholar.
7 For example, some of the Iron Age III rulers of the region were called ‘bēl āli’ or ‘city lord’. See Radner, K., ‘Assyria and the Medes’, in The Oxford Handbook of Ancient Iran, (ed.) D. T. Potts (Oxford, 2013), pp. 442–456Google Scholar; Gopnik, H., ‘The median citadel of Godin Tape period II’, in On The High Road: The History of Godin Tepe Iran. Bibliotheca Iranica, Archaeology Art and Architecture series 1, (eds) H. Gopnik and M. S. Rothman (Costa Mesa, 2011), pp. 285–364Google Scholar.
8 S. Alibaigi and N. Brisch, ‘Report of the first season of excavation of Razi University and University of Copenhagen at Tapeh Kheibar of Rawansar, Kermanshah province’, The 17th Annual Symposium on Iranian Archaeology. The 2018's Short Articles [in Persian], (eds) R. Shirazi and Sh. Hourshid (Tehran, 2019), pp. 924–930.
9 S. Alibaigi, ‘Report of the first season of archaeological research at Quwakh Tapeh (Qubaq Tapeh) of Kouzaran, Kermanshah Province’, report prepared for Archive of the Iranian Center for Archaeological Research, unpublished, 2021; Alibaigi, S., Rezaei, J. McGinnis, N. Brisch, L. D. Levine, I. and Ghanbari, B. ‘Sargon II in the Mahidasht: new evidence from Quwakh Tapeh, Kermanshah’, Zeitschrift für Assyriologie 113.1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1515/za-2023-0004CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
10 Alibaigi, S. and Khosravi., Sh. ‘Some socio-economic evidence from Iron Age societies of the Iranian Central Plateau’, IRAN 42 (2014), pp. 53–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
11 Herzfeld, E., ‘Aufsatze zur altorientalischen Archaologie’, Archaologische Mitteilungen aus Iran 5 (1932/33), pp. 80–104Google Scholar; E. Herzfeld. Iran in the Ancient East (London and New York, 1941); J. Contenau and R. Ghirshman, Fouillesdu Tépé Giyan près de Néhavend 1931 et 1932 (Paris, 1935); M. Rashad, Die entwicklung derv or-und Frühgeschichtlichen stampelsiegel in Iran, Archaologische Mitteilungen aus Iran, Ergänzungsände 13 (Berlin, 1990).
12 Pittman, ‘Chogah Maran’; Khayani and Niknami, ‘Early Bronze Age’; Khayani and Niknami, ‘More Early Bronze Age’; Renette et al., ‘Chogha Maran’.
13 E. Henrickson, ‘Chalcolithic seals and sealings from Seh Gabi, central western Iran’, Iranica Antiqua 23 (1988), pp. 1–19.
14 A. Alizadeh, The Origins of State Organizations in the Prehistoric Highland Fars, Southern Iran Excavations at Tell-e Bakun, (Chicago, 2004).
15 See P. Charvát, ‘The backs of some sealings from Nineveh 5’, Iraq 67.1 (2005), pp. 391–397. For different opinions regarding the importance of door sealings over container sealings, see Khayani and Niknami, ‘Early Bronze Age’, pp. 96–97. Others have suggested that the door-sealing to container-sealing ratio is rooted in other factors, for example, discarded elements, type and nature of the contents of the sealed objects, differences in administrative procedures, and accidents of discovery; see for example: C. Reichel, ‘Seals and sealings at Tell Asmar: a new look at an Ur III to Isin/Larsa Palace’, in Seals and Seal Impressions. Proceedings of the XLVe Rencontre Assyriologique Internationale, vol. ii, (eds) W. W. Hallo and I. J. Winter (Cambridge, MA, 2001), p. 109.
16 Alizadeh, A., ‘The convergence of oppositional and complementary subsistence strategies in prehistoric southwestern Iran’ [in Persian], Journal of Iranian Archaeology 3 (2012), p. 66Google Scholar.
17 Ibid.
18 P. Amiet, Glyptique Susienne (Mémoires de la Délégation archésologique en Iran 43) (Paris, 1972).
19 P. Delougaz and H. Kantor, Chogha Mish: First Five Seasons of Excavation 1961–1971. Vol. I, Part 2: Plates, (ed.) A. Alizadeh (Chicago, 1996).
20 Sh. Aghili Niaki, ‘Computational documents related to the economic administrative in Qoli Darvish II’ [in Persian], in The Archaeology and History of Qom, (ed.) S. Sarlak (Qom, 2011) pp. 147–226; A. Alizadeh, S. Sarlak and S. Aghili, ‘Highland-lowland interaction in the late 4th and early 3rd millennium BCE: the evidence from Qolī Darvīš’, Archäologische Mitteilungen aus Iran und Turan 45 (2013), pp. 149–168.
21 M. Hessari and R. Yousefi Zoshk, ‘The emergence of pre-governmental institution in Central Iranian Plateau: ruling lords in the proto-Elemite period at Pishva's Tepe Sofalin’ [in Persian], Journal of Archaeological Studies 1.2 (2010), pp. 1–22.
22 P. Ferioli, E. Fiandra and S. Tusa, ‘Stamp seals and the functional analysis of their sealings at Shahr-i Sokhta II-III (2700–2200 B. C.)’, in South Asian Archaeology 1975, (ed.) J. E. Lohuizen-de Leeuw (Leiden, 1979), pp. 7–26; M. Ameri, ‘Who holds the keys? Identifying female administrators at Shahr-i Sokhta’, IRAN 60.1 (2022), pp. 1–38; personal communication with Seyed Mansur Seyed Sajjadi.
23 Khayani and Niknami, ‘Early Bronze Age’; Renette et al. ‘Chogha Maran’.
24 Pollock et al., ‘Seal and sealings’.
25 P. Ferioli and E. Fiandra, ‘Archive techniques and methods at Arslantepe’, in Archives before Writing, (eds) P. Ferioli, E. Fiandra, G. G. Fissore and M. Frangipane (Roma, 1994), pp. 154–163; A. Alizadeh, ‘Social and economic complexity and administrative technology in a late prehistoric context’, in Archives before Writing, (eds) Ferioli et al., pp. 35–55; M. Frangipane (ed.), Arslantepe Cretulae. An Early Centralised Administrative System before Writing (Missione Archeologica Italiana nell'Anatolia Orientale, Arslantepe V) (Roma, 2007).
26 J. Fraeser, ‘An alternative view of complexity at Tall-e Bakun A’, IRAN 46 (2008), pp. 1–19.
27 For the nature of different types of contexts in which administrative artefacts are found in various sites, see Khayani and Niknami, ‘Early Bronze Age’, pp. 92–93.
28 Ibid.; Khayani and Niknami, ‘More Early Bronze Age’, Renette et al., ‘Chogha Maran’; Pollock et al., ‘Seal and sealings’.
29 A. A. Sarfaraz, M. Sarraf and E. Yaqmaei, ‘Archaeological surveys in Kermanshah Province’, unpublished report in the Archive of the Ministry of Cultural Heritage, Handicraft and Tourism [in Persian], Tehran, 1968.
30 A. Motarjem, ‘Gozaresh-e Avalin Fasl-e Barresihay-e Bastanshenasi Dasht-e Kouzaran (Report of Archaeological Survey in the Kouzaran Plain’ [in Persian], unpublished report in the Archive of the Cultural Heritage, Handicraft and Tourism office of Kermanshah Province (1998), pp. 70–73.
31 Ibid., p. 70.
32 Some researchers have stated that clay sealings were baked after they were broken off the objects they secured in order to maintain and archive them as a proof for later administrative and accounting procedures; see A. Alizadeh, The Origins of the Elamite State, and the Cultural and Political Developments of Southwestern Iran from the Fifth to the First Millennium BC [in Persian] (Tehran, 2020). The clay sealings from Bakun are controversial in this regard. While McCown reported that they were all baked, Alizadeh states that ‘close examination of the sealings indicated that some of them were not baked, but being produced from a washed pure clay had made them solid’; see A. Langsdorff, and D. E. McCown, Tall-I Bakun: A Season of 1932 (Chicago, 1942), p. 66; Alizadeh, The Origins of State Organizations, p. 159, footnote 3. Door sealings of Tapeh Sofalin and Qoli Darvish clay sealings, except for a single one, were all unbaked, but those of Dehsavar were all baked. See Hessari and Zoshk, ‘The emergence’, p. 7; Aghili Niaki, ‘Computational documents’, p. 167; Pollock et al. ‘Seal and sealings’, p. 380. Alizadeh believes that the baking of these artefacts is crucial to the reconstruction of the related administrative technology as it attests to them being kept as proofs in certain archives for later accounting processes; see Alizadeh, The Origins of State Organizations, p. 159.
33 W. M. Sumner, ‘Excavations at Tall-i Malyan (Anshan) 1974’, IRAN 14 (1976), p. 108; H. Pittman, ‘Proto Elamite art from Operation ABC’, in Early Urban Life in the Land of Anshan: Excavations at Tal-e Malyan in the Highlands of Iran, (ed.) W. M. Sumner (Philadelphia, 2003), fig. 44h.
34 Amiet, Glyptique Susienne, pl. 93: 795, 812; H. Pittman, ‘Glyptic art of Period IV’, in Excavations at Tepe Yahya, Iran 1976–1975, (eds) C. C. Lamberg-Karlovsky and D. T. Potts (Cambridge, 2001), p. 249: 10.12; R. Ghirshman, Fouilles de Sialk prés de Kashan 1933, 1934, 1937 (Paris, 1938), s. 506 and s. 42.
35 Amiet, Glyptique Susienne, pl. 26: 1196; B. Helwing, ‘The rise and fall of Bronze Age centers around the Central Iranian Desert. A comparison of Tappe Hesār II and Arismān’, Archaologische Mitteilungen aus Iran und Turan 38 (2006), fig. 8; H. Ii, ‘Seals and seal impressions from Tell Gubba’ [in Japanese], Al Rafidan 9 (1988), fig. 10: 60–70.
36 Amiet, Glyptique Susienne, pl. 26: 1135; pl. 113: 1064; pl. 115: 1090, 1096; H. Pittman, The Glazed Steatite Glyptic Style: The Structure and Function of an Image System in the Administration of Proto literate Mesopotamia (Berlin, 1994), fig. 4, 18.10 and fig. 16; H. Pittman, ‘Art of Bronze Age in Iran: new chapter from Konar Sandal’, in Sepehr Majd: Essays on the Archaeology of Iranian World and Beyond in Honor of Dr. Youssef Madjidzadeh, (eds) S. Alibaigi, M. Miri and H. Pittman (Tehran, 2021), p. 103, fig. 39. N. Eskandari, ‘The result of the archaeological investigations at the site of Varamin: early phase of Jiroft civilization’ [in Persian], Parseh Journal of Archaeological Studies 4.13 (2020), p. 40, fig. 13; P. Collins, Mountain and Lowlands: Ancient Mesopotamia and Iran (Oxford, 2016), fig. 29.
37 Amiet, Glyptique Susienne, pl. 121: 1213.
38 Ibid. pl. 64, pl. 117: 1125; pl. 118: 1152; P. Amiet, La Glyptique mesopotamienne archéaique (Paris, 1980), p. 495; M. Hessari, ‘New evidence of the emergence of complex societies discovered on the Central Iranian Plateau’ [in Persian], Iranian Journal of Archaeological Studies 1 (2011), pl. 17: 4; H. Pittman, ‘The administrative function of glyptic art in Proto-Elamite Iran: a survey of the evidence’, Res Orientales 10 (1997), p. 147, fig. 5a.; Herzfeld, Iran in the Ancient East, pl. 17.
39 Amiet, Glyptique Susienne, pl. 26: 1221.
40 Pittman, ‘Glyptic art of Period IV’, p. 252: 10.22; Aghili Niaki, ‘Computational documents’, p. 219, pl. 27; Amiet, Glyptique Susienne, pl. 26: 1200, pl. 118: 1156, pl. 119: 1171.
41 Renette et al., ‘Chogha Maran’, pl 39: 1–8; Ii, ‘Seals and seal impressions’, fig. 11: 87, 89.
42 R. J. Matthews, Cities, Sealings and Writing: Archaic Seal Impressions from Jamdet Nasr and Ur (Berlin, 1993), pp. 43, 46.
43 The seal impression does not cover the whole length of the sealing. It might suggest that the impression belongs to a stamp seal. On the other hand, the edges of the impression are not as deep as most stamp impressions, and the parallel impressions are attributed to cylinder seals: see Pittman, ‘Chogah Maran’, fig. 6; Renette et al., ‘Chogha Maran’, pl. 37: 4, pl. 38: 2–4, 6. Also see Amiet, Glyptique Susienne, pl. 124, 1282.
44 Akkermans, P. M. and Duistermaat, K., ‘Of storage and nomads. The sealings from late Neolithic Sabi Abyad, Syria’, Paléorient 22.2 (1996), pp. 17–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Khayani and Niknami, ‘Early Bronze Age’.
45 Aghili Niaki, ‘Computational documents’, p. 166.
46 S. Alibaigi, ‘Delimiting and Rescue Excavation in Taq-e-Bustan’, report prepared for the Archive of the Iranian Center for Archaeological Research [in Persian], unpublished, 2015; E. F. Schmidt, Excavation at Tepe Hissar Damghan, with an Additional Chapter on the Sasanian Building at Tepe Hissar by Fiske Kimball (Philadelphia, 1937), fig. 15: H. 3365, fig. 28a: H. 4414
47 Ghirshman, Fouilles de Sialk, s. 506 and s. 42, s. 1609.
48 Amiet, Glyptique Susienne, pl. 128. 1357; Aghili Niaki, ‘Computational documents’, p. 212, pl. 13.
49 Amiet, Glyptique Susienne, pl. 93, 804; H. Frankfort, Stratified Cylinder Seals from the Diyala Region (Chicago, 1955), pl. 4: 16, pl. 8: 44, pl. 18: 181.
50 Amiet, Glyptique Susienne, pl. 21, 926; H. Pittman, ‘Proto Elamite Art’, pl. 44a; Amiet, P., ‘A cylinder seal impression found at Umm an-Nar’, East and West 25 (1975)Google Scholar, fig. 1.
51 For example, see Hessari and Yousefi Zoshk, ‘The emergence’, p. 20, fig. 12; H. Fazeli Nashli and H. Azizi Kharanaghi, ‘Description of especial finds’, in Socioeconomic Transformation of the Qazvin Plain: Excavation of Tepe Ghabristan. Report 2006, Season Three [in Persian], (ed.) H. Fazeli Nashli (Tehran, 2006), p. 119, figs. 3–28; Renette et al., ‘Chogha Maran’, pl. 51: 8–11.
52 Hessari and Yousefi Zoshk, ‘The emergence’, p. 6; Hessari, ‘New evidence’, p. 42, fig. 13; Renette et al., ‘Chogha Maran’, p. 55, pl. 53.
53 Fazeli Nashli and Azizi Kharanaghi, ‘Description of especial finds’, pp. 106–108.
54 Schmandt-Besserat, D., ‘An ancient token system: the precursor to numerals and writing’, Archaeology 39.6 (1986), p. 34Google Scholar.
55 Amiet, Glyptique Susienne, pl. 20. 830; pl. 92: 770; Aghili Niaki, ‘Computational documents’, p. 212, pl. 12; M. Hessari and H. Akbari, ‘Preliminary report of excavation at ancient site of Pishva's Tapeh Sofalin’, in Archaeological Reports 7. On the occasion of the 9th Annual Symposium on Iranian Archaeology (2nd vol.) [in Persian], (ed.) H. Fazeli Nashli (Tehran, 2007), p. 192, fig. 6; Hessari and Yousefi Zoshk, ‘The emergence’, p. 16, fig. 3.
56 Amiet, Glyptique Susienne, pl. 9: 556; pl. 93. 810.
57 Hessari, M., The Formation and Development of Proto-Writing in Iran (from Pre-Writing to Proto- Elamite) (Tehran, 2013), p. 134Google Scholar, fig. 20.
58 Meyer, L. De, Gasch, H. and Paepe, R., Tell ed-Der I (Leuven, 1977), p. 34, pl. 24Google Scholar; P. Ferioli and E. Fiandra ‘Sealed objects, closing and sealing practices reconstructed from the Cretule. The two main corpora of administrative materials: an initial and final stage in the procedures’, in Arslantepe Cretule, (ed.) Frangipane, p. 71, fig. II.4, c1399; H. Pittman, ‘The glyptic art from Arsalatepe period VI A: a consideration of interregional relations as seen through style and iconography’, in Arslantepe Cretule, (ed.) Frangipane, pl. XVI: 97a.
59 Pittman, ‘Proto Elamite’, pl. 22c.
60 Ghirshman, Fouilles de Sialk, s. 506; M. Rothman and V. R. Badler, ‘Contact and development in Godin Period VI’, in On the High Road: The History of Godin Tepe, Iran, (eds) H. Gopnik and M. Rothman (Costa Mesa, 2011), fig. 4.42: 252–273; Hessari and Yousefi Zoshk, ‘The emergence’, pp. 6 and 17, fig. 6; Ferioli and Fiandra, ‘Sealed objects’, p. 110, fig. 11.35 and pl. XVI; A. Laorito, ‘Cretulae and sealed objects from minor dumping areas in the 4th millennium palace at Arslantepe’, in Arslantepe Cretule, (ed.) Frangipane, p. 130, II.46: a4.
61 Delougaz and Kantor, Chogha Mish.
62 Motarjem, ‘Gozaresh-e Avalin Fasl-e Barresihay-e Bastanshenasi Dasht-e Kouzaran’.
63 Rothman and Badler, ‘Contact and development’.
64 Desset, F., ‘An architectural pattern in late fourth-millennium BC Western Iran: a new link between Susa, Malyan and Godin Tepe’, IRAN 52 (2014), pp. 1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
65 Pittman, The Glazed Steatite Glyptic Style.