Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-23T10:45:12.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Demand for California Wine Grapes*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2012

Kate B. Fuller  and
Julian M. Alston
Kate B. Fuller
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Davis, 1 Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, email: fuller@primal.ucdavis.edu
Julian M. Alston
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Davis, 1 Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, Robert Mondavi Institute Center for Wine Economics, University of California, Davis, email: julian@primal.ucdavis.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Wine grapes contribute significantly to the economy of California, with a gross production value of more than $2 billion in 2010. Studies on economic issues in the industry require measures of demand response to price, but despite the economic importance of this industry, estimates of elasticities of demand for wine grapes have not been published. We use a flexible-form inverse demand system model to estimate elasticities of demand for wine grapes from three grape-growing regions in California, representing three different quality (price) categories. The resulting estimates of own-price elasticities are high, ranging from −2.6 for grapes in the low-price region to −9.5 for grapes in the high-price region. Such high elasticities are plausible given the role of international trade in wine, and they are consistent with synthetic estimates that we computed based on a combination of economic theory, data on market shares, estimates of some pertinent parameters in the literature, and informed guesstimates of values for other parameters. (JEL Classification: Q11, Q12, Q13)

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Wine Economics , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , November 2012 , pp. 192 - 212
Copyright
Copyright © American Association of Wine Economists, 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The authors gratefully acknowledge helpful comments from Karl Storchmann, James Fogarty, Abigail Okrent, Joanna Parks, David Ricardo Heres del Valle, and an anonymous reviewer. The project on which this article is based was supported in part by grants from the California Department of Food and Agriculture Pierce's Disease Research Program and the Giannini Foundation of Agricultural Economics.

References

Alston, J. M., and Scobie, G. M. (1987). A differentiated goods model of the effects of European policies in international poultry markets. Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, 19, 59–68.Google Scholar
Alston, J., Carter, C., Green, R., and Pick, D. (1990). Whither Armington trade models? American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 72, 455–467.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. (1980). Some theory of inverse demand for applied demand analysis. European Economic Review, 14, 281–290.Google Scholar
Anderson, R., and Wilkinson, M. (1979). An evaluation of alternative consumer demand systems within an econometric model of the U.S. livestock sector. Columbia Business School Working Papers, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
Barten, A. (1993). Consumer allocation models: Choice of functional form. Empirical Economics, 18, 129–158.Google Scholar
Brown, M., Lee, J.-Y., and Seale, J. (1995). A family of inverse demand systems and choice of functional form. Empirical Economics, 20, 519–530.Google Scholar
California Department of Food and Agriculture (2011). Agricultural overview. California Agricultural Production Statistics. Sacramento, CA.Google Scholar
California Department of Food and Agriculture/National Agricultural Statistics Service (1985–2011). Annual crush report. Sacramento: National Agricultural Statistics California Field Office.Google Scholar
Clements, K.W., and Maesepp, M. (2011). A self-reflective inverse demand system. Applied Economics Letters, 18, 1739–1743.Google Scholar
Deaton, A. (1979). The distance function in consumer behaviour with applications to index numbers and optimal taxation. Review of Economic Studies, 46, 391–405.Google Scholar
Eales, J., Durham, C., and Wessells, C. (1997). Generalized models of Japanese demand for fish. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79(4), 1153–1163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eales, J., and Unneveher, L. J. (1994). The Inverse Almost Ideal Demand System. European Economic Review, 38, 105–15.Google Scholar
Fogarty, J. (2010). The demand for beer, wine, and spirirts: A survey of the literature. Journal of Economic Surveys, 24, 428–478.Google Scholar
Fogarty, J.J. and Jakeman, G. (2011). Wine tax reform: The impact of introducing a volumetric excise tax for wine. Australian Economic Review, 44, 387–403.Google Scholar
Franklin, M. (2007). Cost of production, volume & management implications. Organisation Internationale de la Vigne et du Vin (O.I.V.) Wine Marketing Short Course. PowerPoint Presentation. University of California, Davis.Google Scholar
Gomberg, Fredrikson, and Associates (1980–2011). Annual wine industry review. Gomberg-Fredrikson Report. Woodside, CA.Google Scholar
Johnson, P. R. (1971). Studies of the demand for U.S. exports of agricultural commodities. Experiment Station Report 15, Department of Economics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh.Google Scholar
Keller, W., and Van Driel, J. (1985). Differential consumer demand systems. European Economic Review, 27, 375–390.Google Scholar
Laitinen, K., and Theil, H. (1979). The Antonelli matrix and the reciprocal Slutsky matrix. Economics Letters, 3, 153–157.Google Scholar
Lapsley, J. (2011). Personal email communication. Davis, California, 24 March 2012.Google Scholar
Muth, R.F. (1964). The derived demand curve for a productive factor and the industry supply curve. Oxford Economic Papers, 16, 221–234.Google Scholar
National Agricultural Statistics Service (2011). Grape release. Olympia, WA. Available at www.wawgg.org/files/documents/2011_NASS_Grape_Report_for_2010_Crop_Year.pdf?PHPSESSID=f8c6009d363f0506cbf426c39a91e543/, accessed November 2, 2011.Google Scholar
Neves, P.D. (1987). Analysis of consumer demand in Portugal, 1958–1981. Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Master's Thesis in Economics, Belgium.Google Scholar
Salvas-Bronsard, L., Leblanc, D., and Bronsard, C. (1977). Estimating demand equations: The converse approach. European Economic Review, 9, 301–321.Google Scholar
Smith, M. (2011). Winemaker math. Kendall-Jackson Winery Blog. Available at http://blog.kj.com/winemaker-math/, accessed September 14, 2011.Google Scholar
Theil, H. (1980). The system-wide approach to microeconomics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Institute, Wine (2010a). US California wine production. Sacramento. Available at www.wineinstitute.org/resources/statistics/article83/, accessed December 7, 2011.Google Scholar
Institute, Wine (2010b). World wine production by country. Available at www.wineinstitute.org/resources/worldstatistics/article87/, accessed December 7, 2011.Google Scholar
Wittwer, G., and Anderson, K. (2002). Impact of the GST and wine tax reform on Australia's wine industry: A CGE analysis. Australian Economic Papers, 41, 69–81.Google Scholar
Wold, H., and Juréen, L. (1955). Demand Analysis. New York: Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar