No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
06–103Gamliel, Eyal (Ruppin Academic Center, Israel) & Liema Davidovitz, Online versus traditional teaching evaluation: Mode can matter. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (Routledge/Taylor&Francis) 30.6 (2005), 581–592.
06–104Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria & Paul Meara (U Wales, UK), Examiner support strategies and test-taker vocabulary. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (Mouton de Gruyter) 43.3 (2005), 239–258.
06–105Luce-Kapler, Rebecca & Don Klinger (Queen's U, Kingston, Canada; rebecca.lucekapler@queensu.ca). Uneasy writing: The defining moments of high-stakes literacy testing. Assessing Writing (Elsevier) 10.3 (2005), 157–173.
06–106McClure, James E. (Ball State U, USA) & Lee C. Spector,Plus/minusgrading and motivation: An empirical study of student choice and performance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (Routledge/Taylor&Francis) 30.6 (2005), 571–579.
06–107Ricketts, Chris (U Portsmouth, UK) & Stan Zakrzewski, A risk-analysis approach to implementing web-based assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (Routledge/Taylor&Francis) 30.6 (2005), 603–620.
- Type
- Abstract
- Information
- Copyright
- 2006 Cambridge University Press
You have
Access