Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-11T16:23:00.592Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Recent experiments at the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory to study the laser driven compression of CH shell targets and the effects of increasing aspect ratio

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

J. Corbett
Affiliation:
Department of Pure and Applied Physics, The Queen's University of Belfast
C. L. S. Lewis
Affiliation:
Department of Pure and Applied Physics, The Queen's University of Belfast
E. Robertson
Affiliation:
Department of Pure and Applied Physics, The Queen's University of Belfast
S. Saadat
Affiliation:
Department of Pure and Applied Physics, The Queen's University of Belfast
P. F. Cunningham
Affiliation:
Department of Pure and Applied Physics, The Queen's University of Belfast
A. Cole
Affiliation:
Laser Division, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
E. Trucu
Affiliation:
Laser Division, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
M. H. Key
Affiliation:
Laser Division, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
S. J. Rose
Affiliation:
Laser Division, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory

Extract

Recent experiments to study the laser driven compression of CH shell targets and the effects of increasing aspect ratio using x-ray shadowgraph techniques are described. This work has been carried out at the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory's Central Laser Facility with 12 beam, 0·53 μm, 1·0 ns irradiation. X-ray shadowgraphy techniques have been used with a frame time of ∼100ps and spatial resolution of 5 to lOμm to obtain density profiles for the compressed targets. A systematic study of 150–200 μm targets with aspect ratios from ∼7 to ∼20 has been performed. The x-ray shadowgraphy techniques used are described, results in the form of x-radiographs presented and a discussion of preliminary results given.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bayer, C., Bernard, M., Billon, D., Decroisette, M., Galmiche, D., Jurasek, D., Launspach, J., Meynial, D. & Sitt, B. 1984 Nucl. Fus. 24, 573.Google Scholar
Bell, A. R., Nicholas, D. J. & Toner, W. T. 1985 Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Annual Report to the Laser Facility Committee, Sections A2.2.1–A2.2.4.Google Scholar
Bell, A. R. & Nicholas, D. J. 1983 Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Report RL-83–127.Google Scholar
Bockasten, Kjell 1961 J. Opt. Soc. Am. 51, 943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiansen, J. P., Ashby, D. E. T. P. & Roberts, K. V. 1974 Comp. Phys. Comm. 7, 271.Google Scholar
Key, M. H., Rumsby, P. T., Cunningham, P. F., Lewis, C. L. S. & Lamb, M. J. 1983 Opt. Comm. 44, 343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, M. H., Rumsby, P. T., Evans, R. G., Lewis, C. L. S., Ward, J. M. & Cooke, R. L. 1980 Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 1901.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. L. S., Lamb, M. J., McCavana, P., McGlinchey, J., Saadat, S., Key, M. H., Toner, W. T., & Cole, A. J. 1985 Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Annual Report to the Laser Facility Committee, Sections A2.2.1–A2.2.4.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. L. S. & McGlinchey, J. 1985 Opt. Comm. 53, 179.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. L. S., Saadat, S., Lamb, M. J., McCavana, P., McGlinchey, J., Key, M. H., Toner, W. T. & Eason, R. W. 1984 Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Annual Report to the Laser Facility Committee, Section A2.2.4.Google Scholar
Rose, J. & Evans, R. G. 1983 Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Report RL-82–040.Google Scholar
Tsakiris, G., Bayerl, J., McGlinchey, J., Lewis, C. L. S., Damerell, A. R. & Hooker, C. J. 1985 Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Annual Report to the Laser Facility Committee, Section A6.7.1.Google Scholar