Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T00:40:46.228Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Suffrage Extensions and Voting Patterns in Latin America: Is Mobilization a Source of Decay?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Marisa Kellam
Marisa Kellam*
Affiliation:
Waseda Institute for Advanced Study, Waseda University, Tokyo. kellam@aoni.waseda.jp
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines whether changes in electoral participation contributed to electoral volatility in Latin America between 1945 and 2000. As a result of literacy voting requirements and authoritarian interludes that disenfranchised large portions of the population, new voters in Latin America probably had different political interests from the previous electorate and were not socialized to electoral politics. The article considers the hypothesis that the inclusion of new voters with different interests produces an immediate, short-term change in aggregate voting patterns, and a lack of socialization of new voters generates lingering instability in electoral behavior. Accounting for confounding factors, the analysis of legislative elections in 12 countries indicates that the expansion of the electorate temporarily disrupted voting patterns in Latin America but did not lead to long-run party system decay.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 55 , Issue 4 , Winter 2013 , pp. 23 - 46
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amorim Neto, Octavio, and Cox, Gary W. 1997. Electoral Institutions, Cleavage Structures, and the Number of Parties. American Journal of Political Science 41, 1: 149–74.Google Scholar
Bartolini, Stefano, and Mair, Peter. 1990. Identity, Competition, and Electoral Availability: The Stabilisation of European Electorates, 1885–1985. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel. 2001. Time-Series–Cross-Section Data: What Have We Learned in the past Few Years? Annual Review of Political Science 4: 271–93.Google Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, and Katz, Jonathan. 1995. What to Do and Not to Do with Time-Series Cross-Sectional Data. American Political Science Review 89, 3: 634–47.Google Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, and Katz, Jonathan. 1996. Nuisance vs. Substance: Specifying and Estimating Time-Series Cross-Section Models. Political Analysis 6: 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birnir, Johanna. 2004. Stabilizing Party Systems and excluding Segments of Society? the Effects of Formation Costs on Representation in Latin America. Studies in Comparative International Development 39, 3: 3–28.Google Scholar
Birnir, Johanna Kristin, and Lee Van Cott, Donna. 2007. Disunity in Diversity: Party System Fragmentation and the Dynamic Effect of Ethnic Heterogeneity on Latin American Legislatures. Latin American Research Review 42, 1: 99–125.Google Scholar
Burger, Julian. 1990. Guia Atlas of First Peoples: A Future for the Indian World. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Canton, Dario. 1968. Materiales para el estudio de la sociología política en la Argentina. Buenos Aires: Editorial del Instituto Torcuato di Tella.Google Scholar
CELADE. 1997a. Boletín Demográfico no. 60. www.eclac.org/Edlade-ESP/bol60/DE_SitDemBD60.html.Google Scholar
CELADE. 1997b. Boletín Demográfico no. 66. www.eclac.org/Edlade-ESP/bol66/DE_SitDemBD66.html.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E., 1969. Of Time and Partisan Stability. Comparative Political Studies 2, 2: 139–71.Google Scholar
Coppedge, Michael. 1998. The Dynamic Diversity of Latin American Party Systems. Party Politics 4, 4: 547–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cotler, Julio. 1995. Political Parties and the Problems of Democratic Consolidation in Peru. In Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America, ed. Mainwaring, Scott and Scully, Timothy R.. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 399–433.Google Scholar
Dix, Robert. 1992. Cleavage Structures and Party Systems in Latin America. Comparative Political Studies 22, 1: 23–37.Google Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 2003. Paradigms and Sand Castles: Theory Building and Research Design in Comparative Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Geddes, Barbara, and Frantz, Erica. 2007. The Legacy of Dictatorship for Democratic Parties in Latin America. Paper presented at the 2007 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, August 30—September 2.Google Scholar
Golder, Matt. 2006. Presidential Coattails and Legislative Fragmentation. American Journal of Political Science 50, 1: 34–48.Google Scholar
Greene, William. 1997. Econometric Analysis. 3rd edition. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hellinger, Daniel. 1978. Electoral Change in the Chilean Countryside: the Presidential Elections of 1958 and 1970. Western Political Quarterly 31, 2: 253–73.Google Scholar
Hicken, Allen, and Stoll, Heather. 2011. Presidents and Parties: How Presidential Elections Shape Coordination in Legislative Elections. Comparative Political Studies 44, 7: 854–83.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel. 1965. Political Development and Political Decay. World Politics 17, 3: 386–430.Google Scholar
Interamerican Development Bank (IDB). Statistics and Quantitative Analysis Unit. 1999. Illiteracy. http://www.iadb.org/int/sta/ENGLISH/social/it.htm. Accessed March 29, 2001.Google Scholar
International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA). 2008. Voter Turnout website. Compulsory voting information. www.idea.int/vt/compulsory_voting.cfm Google Scholar
Jackman, Simon. 2001. Compulsory Voting. In International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, ed. Smelser, Neil J. and Baltes, Paul B.. Oxford: Elsevier. 16314–18.Google Scholar
Jones, Mark P., 1995. A Guide to the Electoral Systems of the Americas. Electoral Studies 14, 1: 5–21.Google Scholar
Jones, Mark P., 1997. A Guide to the Electoral Systems of the Americas: an Update. Electoral Studies 16, 1: 13–15.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 2000. Linkages between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic Polities. Comparative Political Studies 33, 6–7: 845–79.Google Scholar
Lapp, Nancy D., 2004. Landing Votes: Representation and Land Reform in Latin America. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin, and Rokkan, Stein. 1967. Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Lupu, Noam, and Stokes, Susan. 2010. Democracy, Interrupted: Regime Change and Partisanship in Twentieth-Century Argentina. Electoral Studies 29: 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddison, Angus. 2003. The World Economy: Historical Statistics. Paris: OECD Development Centre.Google Scholar
Madrid, Raul. 2005. Ethnic Cleavages and Electoral Volatility in Latin America. Comparative Politics 38, 1: 1–20.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott. 1998. Party Systems in the Third Wave. Journal of Democracy 9, 3: 67–81.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott. 1999. Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Zoco, Edurne. 2007. Political Sequences and the Stabilization of Interparty Competition. Party Politics 13, 2: 155–78.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Scully, Timothy. 1995. Introduction. In Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America, ed. Mainwaring, and Scully, . Stanford: Stanford University Press. 1–34.Google Scholar
Mair, Peter. 1997. Party System Change: Approaches and Interpretations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nohlen, Dieter. 1993. Enciclopedia electoral latinoamericana y del Caribe. San José, Costa Rica: Instituto Interamericano de Derechos Humanos.Google Scholar
Payne, J. Mark, Daniel Zovatto, G., Carrillo Flórez, Fernando, and Allamand Zavala, Andrés. 2002. Democracies in Development: Politics and Reform in Latin America. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
Pederson, Morgens. 1983. Changing Patterns of Electoral Volatility in European Party Systems, 1948–1977: Explorations in Explanation. In Western European Party Systems: Continuity and Change, ed. Daalder, Hans and Mair, Peter. Beverly Hills: Sage. 29–66.Google Scholar
Powell, Eleanor Neff, and Tucker, Joshua. 2010. New Approaches to Electoral Volatility: Evidence from Postcommunist Countries. Paper presented at the 2009 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Toronto, September 3–6.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1975. Institutionalization of Voting Patterns, or, Is Mobilization the Source of Decay? American Political Science Review 69, 1: 49–67.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 2008. Conquered or Granted? a History of Suffrage Extensions. British Journal of Political Science 39: 291–321.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 2009. Constraints and Choices: Electoral Participation in Historical Perspective. Comparative Political Studies 42, 1: 4–30.Google Scholar
Remmer, Karen. 1985. Redemocratization and the Impact of Authoritarian Rule in Latin America. Comparative Politics 17, 3: 253–75.Google Scholar
Remmer, Karen. 1991. The Political Impact of Economic Crisis in Latin America in the 1980s. American Political Science Review 85, 3: 777–800.Google Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth M., and Wibbels, Erik. 1999. Party Systems and Electoral Volatility in Latin America: a Test of Economic, Institutional, and Structural Explanations. American Political Science Review 93, 3: 575–90.Google Scholar
Rokkan, Stein. 1961. Mass Suffrage, Secret Voting and Political Participation. European Journal of Sociology 2, 1: 132–52.Google Scholar
Scully, Timothy. 1992. Rethinking the Center: Party Politics in Nineteenth- and Twentieth-Century Chile. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Shugart, Matthew Soberg, and Carey, John M.. 1992. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stimson, James. 1985. Regression in Space and Time: a Statistical Essay. American Journal of Political Science 294: 914–47.Google Scholar
Stokes, Susan C., 2005. Perverse Accountability: a Formal Model of Machine Politics with Evidence from Argentina. American Political Science Review 99, 3: 315–25.Google Scholar
Tavits, Margit. 2005a. The Development of Stable Party Support: Electoral Dynamics in Postcommunist Europe. American Journal of Political Science 49, 2: 283–98.Google Scholar
Tavits, Margit. 2005b. On the Linkage between Electoral Volatility and Party System Instability in Central and Eastern Europe. European Journal of Political Research 47: 537–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Cott, Donna Lee. 2000. Party System Development and Indigenous Populations in Latin America: the Bolivian Case. Party Politics 6, 2: 155–74.Google Scholar
Van Cott, Donna Lee. 2005. From Movements to Parties in Latin America: The Evolution of Ethnic Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Sven E., and Butler, Daniel M.. 2007. A Lot More to Do: the Sensitivity of Time-Series Cross-Section Analyses to Simple Alternative Specifications. Political Analysis 15: 101–23.Google Scholar
Yashar, Deborah J., 2005. Contesting Citizenship in Latin America: The Rise of Indigenous Movements and the Postliberal Challenge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar