Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-06T11:24:18.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Double-Edged Sword Effect of the Presence of a Moral Star: Promotion Versus Inhibition of Nonstars' Prosocial Behavior

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 December 2023

Dong Ju
Affiliation:
Business School, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
Shengming Liu*
Affiliation:
School of Management, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
Marshall Schminke
Affiliation:
College of Business, University of Central Florida, Orlando, USA
Mingpeng Huang
Affiliation:
Business School, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing, China
Xin Qin
Affiliation:
Sun Yat-sen Business School, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
*
Corresponding author: Shengming Liu (shengmingliu@fudan.edu.cn)

Abstract

Although a growing body of literature on star employees has focused on top performers, the influence of moral stars has been neglected, an unfortunate situation given that employees’ moral behavior has prolonged impacts on organizations and society as a whole. In this case, we propose the concept of the moral star, defined as the employee (not the team leader) who exhibits disproportionately high and prolonged morality relative to others and has a reputation of being moral on his or her team. We further draw upon self-categorization theory and investigate the double-edged sword effect of the presence of a moral star on the prosocial behavior of other team members. Specifically, we propose that for nonstar employees who have high levels of moral identity, the presence of a moral star is positively related to their felt moral responsibility and prosocial behavior. In contrast, for nonstar employees with low levels of moral identity, the presence of a moral star is negatively related to their felt moral responsibility and prosocial behavior. We found support for our hypotheses across an experiment and a multi-wave and multi-source field study. Taken together, our findings call for closer attention to the recognition of moral stars, as well as their potential unintended negative impact on teams and organizations.

摘要

摘要

以往关于明星员工的研究大多聚焦于绩效明星,却忽略了对道德明星的研究。事实上,道德明星对组织和社会都具有重要影响。因此,我们提出了道德明星的概念,并基于自我分类理论探讨了组织中存在道德明星对其他成员亲社会行为的双刃剑效应。道德明星是指那些长期以来相比他人做了更多道德行为的员工(不是领导),并在团队中以道德典范闻名。我们通过一项实验研究和一项多时间点、多来源的实证研究发现,对于道德认同高的员工,道德明星的存在能够激发他们的道德责任感以及进一步的亲社会行为。相反,对于道德认同低的员工,道德明星的存在反而与其感知到的道德责任及亲社会行为负向相关。我们呼吁学者关注对道德明星的认可研究,同时也要注意他们对团队和组织带来的潜在负面影响。

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The International Association for Chinese Management Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, D. 1994. Political distinctiveness: An identity optimising approach. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24(3): 357365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aguinis, H., & O'Boyle, E. Jr., 2014. Star performers in twenty-first century organizations. Personnel Psychology, 67(2): 313350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aguinis, H., Ji, Y. H., & Joo, H. 2018. Gender productivity gap among star performers in STEM and other scientific fields. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(12): 12831306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aliyun. 2021. In its 14th year, this is the 13th time that Alibaba has presented this award. Available from URL: https://developer.aliyun.com/article/809334Google Scholar
Allen, V. L., & Wilder, D. A. 1979. Group categorization and attribution of belief similarity. Small Group Behavior, 10(1): 7380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aquino, K., & Freeman, D. 2009. Moral identity in business situations: A social-cognitive framework for understanding moral functioning. In Narvaez, D. & Lapsley, D. K. (Eds.), Personality, identity, and character: Explorations in moral psychology: 375395. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aquino, K., & ReedII, A., 2002. The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6): 14231440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aquino, K., Freeman, D., Reed II, A., Lim, V. K., & Felps, W. 2009. Testing a social-cognitive model of moral behavior: the interactive influence of situations and moral identity centrality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1): 123141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. 1989. Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1): 2039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babalola, M. T., Stouten, J., Camps, J., & Euwema, M. 2017. When do ethical leaders become less effective? The moderating role of perceived leader ethical conviction on employee discretionary reactions to ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(1): 85102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y., & Phillips, L. W. 1991. Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3): 421458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. 1977. Social learning theory, vol. 1. Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. 2000. The mind in the middle. In Reis, H. T. & Judd, C. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology, vol. 2: 253285. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beck, J. W., Beatty, A. S., & Sackett, P. R. 2014. On the distribution of job performance: The role of measurement characteristics in observed departures from normality. Personnel Psychology, 67(3): 531566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergman, R. 2002. Why be moral? A conceptual model from developmental psychology. Human Development, 45(2): 104124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernerth, J. B., & Aguinis, H. 2016. A critical review and best-practice recommendations for control variable usage. Personnel Psychology, 69(1): 229283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, E., Bruno, J. M., & Sarabia-Sanchez, F. J. 2019. The impact of perceived CSR on corporate reputation and purchase intention. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 28(3): 206221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blader, S. L., & Tyler, T. R. 2009. Testing and extending the group engagement model: Linkages between social identity, procedural justice, economic outcomes, and extra-role behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2): 445464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blasi, A. 1980. Bridging moral cognition and moral action: A critical review of the literature. Psychological Bulletin, 88(1): 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blasi, A. 1993. The development of identity: Some implications for moral functioning. In Noam, G. G. & Wren, T. E. (Eds.), The moral self: 99122. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Blasi, A. 2004. Moral functioning: Moral understanding and personality. In Lapsley, D. K. & Narvaez, D. (Eds.), Moral development, self, and identity: 189212. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Brief, A. P., & Motowidlo, S. J. 1986. Prosocial organizational behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 11(4): 710725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brislin, R. W. 1980. Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. In Triandis, H. C. & Lambert, W. W. (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: 349444. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. 2006. Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. Leadership Quarterly, 17(6): 595616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. 2005. Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing.. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2): 117134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. 2000. Social identity theory: Past achievements, current problems and future challenges. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30(6): 745778.3.0.CO;2-O>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J. S. 1957. On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 64(2): 123152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. 2011. Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1): 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, M. A., Fournier, G. M., & Prasad, K. 2007. The diffusion of a medical innovation: is success in the stars? Southern Economic Journal, 73(3): 588603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Call, M. L., Nyberg, A. J., & Thatcher, S. M. B. 2015. Stargazing: An integrative conceptual review, theoretical reconciliation, and extension for star employee research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(3): 623640.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Call, M. L., Campbell, E. M., Dunford, B. B., Boswell, W. R., & Boss, R. W. 2020. Shining with the Stars? Unearthing how group star proportion shapes non-star performance. Personnel Psychology, 74(3): 543572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatman, J. A., & Spataro, S. E. 2005. Using self-categorization theory to understand relational demography-based variations in people's responsiveness to organizational culture. Academy of Management Journal, 48(2): 321331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chattopadhyay, P., George, E., & Shulman, A. D. 2008. The asymmetrical influence of sex dissimilarity in distributive vs. colocated work groups. Organization Science, 19(4): 581593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chattopadhyay, P., Tluchowska, M., & George, E. 2004. Identifying the ingroup: A closer look at the influence of demographic dissimilarity on employee social identity. Academy of Management Review, 29(2): 180202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, H., & Soltes, E. 2018. Why compliance programs fail: And how to fix them. Harvard Business Review, 96(2): 116125.Google Scholar
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. 2003. Applied multiple correlation/regression for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Collins, D. 2012. Business ethics: How to design and manage ethical organizations. NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Colquitt, J. A., Baer, M. D., Long, D. M., & Halvorsen-Ganepola, M. D. 2014. Scale indicators of social exchange relationships: A comparison of relative content validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(4): 599618.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dalal, R. S. 2006. A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6): 12411255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalal, R. S., Lam, H., Weiss, H. M., Welch, E. R., & Hulin, C. L. 2009. A within-person approach to work behavior and performance: Concurrent and lagged citizenship-counterproductivity associations, and dynamic relationships with affect and overall job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 52(2): 10511065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Cremer, D., Mayer, D. M., Van Dijke, M., Schouten, B. C., & Bardes, M. 2009. When does self-sacrificial leadership motivate prosocial behavior? It depends on followers’ prevention focus. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4): 887899.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Groot, J. I., & Steg, L. 2009. Morality and prosocial behavior: The role of awareness, responsibility, and norms in the norm activation model. Journal of Social Psychology, 149(4): 425449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeWall, C. N., Baumeister, R. F., Gailliot, M. T., & Maner, J. K. 2008. Depletion makes the heart grow less helpful: Helping as a function of self-regulatory energy and genetic relatedness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(12): 16531662.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., Validizic, A., Matoka, K., Johnson, B., & Frazier, S. 1997. Extending the benefit of recategorization: Evaluations, self-disclosure, and helping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33(4): 401442.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. 2007. Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12(1): 122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eisenberg, N. 1991. Meta-analytic contributions to the literature on prosocial behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(3): 273282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberger, R., Armeli, S., Rexwinkel, B., Lynch, P. D., & Rhoades, L. 2001. Reciprocation of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1): 4251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Epley, N., & Kumar, A. 2019. How to design an ethical organization. Harvard Business Review, 97: 144–150.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., & Lehmann, A. C. 1996. Expert and exceptional performance: Evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints. Annual Review of Psychology, 47: 273305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farmer, S. M., Van Dyne, L., & Kamdar, D. 2015. The contextualized self: How team-member exchange leads to coworker identification and helping OCB. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(2): 583595.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fehr, R., Yam, K. C., & Dang, C. 2015. Moralized leadership: The construction and consequences of ethical leader perceptions. Academy of Management Review, 40(2): 182209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, R., Yam, K. C., He, W., Chiang, J. T. J., & Wei, W. 2017. Polluted work: A self-control perspective on air pollution appraisals, organizational citizenship, and counterproductive work behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 143: 98110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, P., Krueger, J. I., Greitemeyer, T., Vogrincic, C., Kastenmüller, A., Frey, D., & Kainbacher, M. 2011. The bystander-effect: A meta-analytic review on bystander intervention in dangerous and non-dangerous emergencies. Psychological Bulletin, 137(4): 517537.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. 1991. Social cognition. New York: Mcgraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
Fuller, J. B., Marler, L. E., & Hester, K. 2006. Promoting felt responsibility for constructive change and proactive behavior: Exploring aspects of an elaborated model of work design. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(8): 10891120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, H. 2005. Multiple lenses on the mind. In ExpoGestion conference, Bogota Colombia (pp. 1–29).Google Scholar
Garr, S. S. 2012. The state of employee recognition in 2012. Oakland, CA: Bersin & Associates.Google Scholar
Groysberg, B., Lee, L. E., & Nanda, A. 2008. Can they take it with them? The portability of star knowledge workers’ performance. Management Science, 54(7): 12131230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannah, S. T., Jennings, P. L., Bluhm, D., Peng, A. C., & Schaubroeck, J. M. 2014. Duty orientation: Theoretical development and preliminary construct testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 123(2): 220238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinkin, T. R. 1998. A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1(1): 104121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. I. 2000. Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25(1): 121140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogg, M. A., Terry, D. J., & White, K. M. 1995. A tale of two theories: A critical comparison of identity theory with social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58(4): 255269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: a Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1): 155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphrey, S. E., Morgeson, F. P., & Mannor, M. J. 2009. Developing a theory of the strategic core of teams: A role composition model of team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1): 4861.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ju, D., Huang, M., Liu, D., Qin, X., Hu, Q., & Chen, C. 2019. Supervisory consequences of abusive supervision: An investigation of sense of power, managerial self-efficacy, and task-oriented leadership behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 154: 8095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamdar, D., McAllister, D. J., & Turban, D. B. 2006. All in a day's work’: How follower individual differences and justice perceptions predict OCB role definitions and behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4): 841855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kehoe, R. R., & Tzabbar, D. 2014. Lighting the way or stealing the shine? An examination of the duality in star scientists’ effects on firm innovative performance. Strategic Management Journal, 36(5): 709727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosfeld, M., & Neckermann, S. 2011. Getting more work for nothing? Symbolic awards and worker performance. American Economic Journal Microeconomics, 3(3): 8699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacetera, N., Cockburn, I. M., & Henderson, R. 2004. Do firms change capabilities by hiring new people? A study of the adoption of science-based drug discovery. Advances in Strategic Management, 21: 133160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lam, C. K., Van der Vegt, G. S., Walter, F., & Huang, X. 2011. Harming high performers: A social comparison perspective on interpersonal harming in work teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(3): 588601.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lam, L. W., Liu, Y., & Loi, R. 2016. Looking intra-organizationally for identity cues: Whether perceived organizational support shapes employees’ organizational identification. Human Relations, 69(2): 345367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, N., Zhao, H. H., Walter, S. L., Zhang, X. A., & Yu, J. 2015. Achieving more with less: Extra milers’ behavioral influences in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(4): 10251039.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, N., Zheng, X., Harris, T. B., Liu, X., & Kirkman, B. L. 2016. Recognizing ‘me’ benefits ‘we’: Investigating the positive spillover effects of formal individual recognition in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(7): 925939.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, Y., Li, N., Li, C., & Li, J. 2020. The boon and bane of creative ‘stars’: A social network exploration of how and when team creativity is (and is not) driven by a star teammate. Academy of Management Journal, 63(2): 613635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, S. H. J., & Johnson, R. E. 2015. A suggestion to improve a day keeps your depletion away: Examining promotive and prohibitive voice behaviors within a regulatory focus and ego depletion framework. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(5): 13811397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockwood, P., & Kunda, Z. 1997. Superstars and me: Predicting the impact of role models on the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(1): 91103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, D. M., Baer, M. D., Colquitt, J. A., Outlaw, R., & Dhensa-Kahlon, R. K. 2015. What will the boss think? The impression management implications of supportive relationships with star and project peers. Personnel Psychology, 68(3): 463498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorinkova, N. M., & Perry, S. J. 2019. The importance of group-focused transformational leadership and felt obligation for helping and group performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(3): 231247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luthans, F., & Stajkovic, A. D. 2009. Provide recognition for performance improvement. In Locke, E. A. (Ed.), Handbook of principles of organizational behavior, 2nd ed.: 239254. Oxford, United Kingdom: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mackie, D. M. 1986. Social identification effects in group polarization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(4): 720728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mael, F. A., & Ashforth, B. E. 1992. Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2): 103123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markham, S. E., Scott, K., & McKee, G. 2002. Recognizing good attendance: A longitudinal, quasi-experimental field study. Personnel Psychology, 55(3): 639660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matzler, K., & Mueller, J. 2011. Antecedents of knowledge sharing-Examining the influence of learning and performance orientation. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(3): 317329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, D. M., Kuenzi, M., Greenbaum, R., Bardes, M., & Salvador, R. 2009. How low does ethical leadership flow? Test of a trickle-down model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108: 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meade, A. W., & Craig, S. B. 2012. Identifying careless responses in survey data. Psychological Methods, 17(3): 437455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitchell, M. S., & Ambrose, M. L. 2007. Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4): 11591168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mo, S., & Shi, J. 2017. Linking ethical leadership to employee burnout, workplace deviance and performance: Testing the mediating roles of trust in leader and surface acting. Journal of Business Ethics, 144(2): 293303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. 2012. Mplus statistical modeling software: Release 7.0. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
Ng, T. W., & Feldman, D. C. 2015. Ethical leadership: Meta-analytic evidence of criterion-related and incremental validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(3): 948965.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oakes, P. J. 1987. The salience of social categories. In Turner, J. C. (Ed.), Rediscovering the social group: 117141. New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
O'Boyle, E. H. Jr., & Aguinis, H. 2012. The best and the rest: Revisiting the norm of normality of individual performance. Personnel Psychology, 65(1): 79119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oldroyd, J. B., & Morris, S. S. 2012. Catching falling stars: A human resource response to social capital's detrimental effect of information overload on star employees. Academy of Management Review, 37(3): 396418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organ, D. W., & Ryan, K. 1995. A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 48(4): 775802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owens, B. P., Johnson, M. D., & Mitchell, T. R. 2013. Expressed humility in organizations: Implications for performance, teams, and leadership. Organization Science, 24(5): 15171538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owens, B. P., Yam, K. C., Bednar, J. S., Mao, J., & Hart, D. W. 2019. The impact of leader moral humility on follower moral self–efficacy and behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(1): 146163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Ipeirotis, P. G. 2010. Running experiments on amazon mechanical turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 5(5): 411419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, B., & Rothbart, M. 1982. Perception of out-group homogeneity and levels of social categorization: Memory for the subordinate attributes of in-group and out-group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(6): 10511068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, J. L., & Gregersen, H. B. 1991. Task interdependence and extrarole behavior: A test of the mediating effects of felt responsibility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(6): 838844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penner, L. A., Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., & Schroeder, D. A. 2005. Prosocial behavior: Multilevel perspectives. Annual Review of Psychology, 56: 365392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. 2000. Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3): 513563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preacher, K. J., & Selig, J. P. 2012. Advantages of Monte Carlo confidence intervals for indirect effects. Communication Methods and Measures, 6(2): 7798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. 2007. Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1): 185227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Qin, X., Chen, C., Yam, K. C., Huang, M., & Ju, D. 2020. The double-edged sword of leader humility: Investigating when and why leader humility promotes versus inhibits subordinate deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(7): 693712.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Qin, X., Huang, M., Johnson, R. E., Hu, Q., & Ju, D. 2018a. The short-lived benefits of abusive supervisory behavior for actors: An investigation of recovery and work engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 61(5): 19511975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qin, X., Ren, R., Zhang, Z. X., & Johnson, R. E. 2018b. Considering self-interests and symbolism together: How instrumental and value-expressive motives interact to influence supervisors’ justice behavior. Personnel Psychology, 71(2): 225253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, A., Aquino, K., & Levy, E. 2007. Moral identity and judgments of charitable behaviors. Journal of Marketing, 71(1): 178193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, S. J. 2006. Moral awareness and ethical predispositions: Investigating the role of individual differences in the recognition of moral issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1): 233243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reynolds, S. J. 2008. Moral attentiveness: Who pays attention to the moral aspects of life? Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5): 10271041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, S. J., & Ceranic, T. L. 2007. The effects of moral judgment and moral identity on moral behavior: An empirical examination of the moral individual. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6): 16101624.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rich, G. A. 1997. The sales manager as a role model: Effects on trust, job satisfaction, and performance of salespeople. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25: 319328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodell, J. B. 2013. Finding meaning through volunteering: Why do employees volunteer and what does it mean for their jobs? Academy of Management Journal, 56(5): 12741294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothbart, M., Evans, M., & Fulero, S. 1979. Recall for confirming events: Memory processes and the maintenance of social stereotypes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15(4): 343355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothbart, M., Fulero, S., Jensen, C., Howard, J., & Birrell, P. 1978. From individual to group impressions: Availability heuristics in stereotype formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14(3): 237255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaubroeck, J. M., Demirtas, O., Peng, A. C., & Pei, D. 2022. ‘I’ am affirmed, but are ‘we’? Social identity processes influencing refugees’ work initiative and community embeddedness. Academy of Management Journal, 65(2): 403426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schminke, M., Ambrose, M. L., & Neubaum, D. O. 2005. The effect of leader moral development on ethical climate and employee attitudes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2): 135151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schminke, M., Caldwell, J., Ambrose, M. L., & McMahon, S. R. 2014. Better than ever? Employee reactions to ethical failures in organizations, and the ethical recovery paradox. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 123(2): 206219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoorman, F. D., & Holahan, P. J. 1996. Psychological antecedents of escalation behavior: effects of choice, responsibility, and decision consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(6): 786794.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. 1983. Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(4): 653663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starrett, R. H. 1996. Assessment of global responsibility. Psychological Reports, 78(2): 535554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. 2000. Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(3): 224237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, H., & Forgas, J. 1981. Social categorization: Cognitions, values and groups. In Forgas, J. (Ed.), Social cognition: Perspectives on everyday understanding: 113140. London: Academic.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. 1979. An integrative theory of inter-group conflict. In Austin, W. G., & Worchel, S. (Eds.), The social psychology of inter-group relations: 3347. Monterey, CA: Brooks Cole.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. 1986. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In Worchel, S., & Austin, W. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations: 724. Chicago, IL: Nelson Hall.Google Scholar
Tepper, B. J. 2000. Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2): 178190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. 2006. Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 32(6): 951990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treviño, L. K., den Nieuwenboer, N. A., & Kish-Gephart, J. J. 2014. (Un)ethical behavior in organizations. Annual Review of Psychology, 65: 635660.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trope, Y. 1978. Inferences of personal characteristics on the basis of information retrieved from one's memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(2): 93106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, J. C., & Oakes, P. J. 1986. The significance of the social identity concept for social psychology with reference to individualism, interactionism and social influence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 25(3): 237252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. 1987. Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Turner, J. C., & Tajfel, H. 1986. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 5: 724.Google Scholar
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. 1973. Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5(2): 207232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. 2000. Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity, and behavioral engagement. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Tzabbar, D., & Kehoe, R. R. 2014. Can opportunity emerge from disarray? An examination of exploration and exploitation following star scientist turnover. Journal of Management, 40(2): 449482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Vegt, G. S., & Van de Vliert, E. 2005. Effects of perceived skill dissimilarity and task interdependence on helping in work teams. Journal of Management, 31(1): 7389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. 1998. Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1): 108119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Gils, S., Van Quaquebeke, N., Van Knippenberg, D., Van Dijke, M., & De Cremer, D. 2015. Ethical leadership and follower organizational deviance: The moderating role of follower moral attentiveness. Leadership Quarterly, 26(2): 190203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volmer, J., & Sonnentag, S. 2011. The role of star performers in software design teams. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 26(3): 219234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Z., Xing, L., Xu, H., & Hannah, S. T. 2021. Not all followers socially learn from ethical leaders: The roles of followers’ moral identity and leader identification in the ethical leadership process. Journal of Business Ethics, 170: 449469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yam, K. C., Barnes, C. M., Leavitt, K., Wei, W., Lau, J., & Uhlmann, E. L. 2019. Why so serious? A laboratory and field investigation of the link between morality and humor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117: 758772.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, K. S. 1993. Chinese social orientation: An integrative analysis. In Cheng, L. Y., Cheng, F. M. C., & Chen, C. N. (Eds.), Psychotherapy for the Chinese: Selected papers from the First International Conference: 1956. Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Yeo, G. B., & Neal, A. 2004. A multilevel analysis of effort, practice, and performance: effects; of ability, conscientiousness, and goal orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(2): 231247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zapper Insights. 2012. Four peer-to-peer ways zappos employees reward each other. Available from URL: https://www.zapposinsights.com/blog/item/four-peertopeer-ways-zappos-employees-reward-each-otherGoogle Scholar
Zhang, G., Bai, Y., Caza, A., & Wang, L. 2014. Leader integrity and organizational citizenship behaviour in China. Management and Organization Review, 10(2): 299319.Google Scholar
Zheng, X., Zhao, H. H., Liu, X., & Li, N. 2019. Network reconfiguration: The implications of recognizing top performers in teams. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 92(4): 825847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, Y., & Akhtar, S. 2014. How transformational leadership influences follower helping behavior: The role of trust and prosocial motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(3): 373392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar