Fracastoro and Henle: a re-appraisal of their contribution to the concept of communicable diseases

Norman Howard-Jones

doi:10.1017/S0025727300037170

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Crossref Citations

This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.

Ten Have, Henk A. M. J. 1990. The Growth of Medical Knowledge. Vol. 36, Issue. , p. 15.

Evans, Alfred S. 1993. Causation and Disease. p. 1.

Evans, Alfred S. 1993. Causation and Disease. p. 13.

Iommi Echeverría, Virginia 2010. Girolamo Fracastoro y la invención de la sífilis. História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos, Vol. 17, Issue. 4, p. 877.

2011. Germ Theory. p. 45.

2013. Furcht und Furchtlosigkeit. p. 185.

Heyman, Paul Simons, Leopold and Cochez, Christel 2014. Were the English Sweating Sickness and the Picardy Sweat Caused by Hantaviruses?. Viruses, Vol. 6, Issue. 1, p. 151.

Dawes, Gregory W. 2018. Identifying Pseudoscience: A Social Process Criterion. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, Vol. 49, Issue. 3, p. 283.

Rees, Anthony R. 2022. A New History of Vaccines for Infectious Diseases. p. 73.

Barbieri, Rémi Nodari, Riccardo Signoli, Michel Epis, Sara Raoult, Didier and Drancourt, Michel 2022. Differential word expression analyses highlight plague dynamics during the second pandemic. Royal Society Open Science, Vol. 9, Issue. 1,

Article contents

Fracastoro and Henle: a re-appraisal of their contribution to the concept of communicable diseases

Abstract

Save article to Kindle

Save article to Dropbox

Save article to Google Drive

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

You have entered the maximum number of contributors

Conflicting interests