Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T18:04:53.126Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Multifocus Optical Microscopy Applied to the Study of Archaeological Metals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 June 2013

Elin Figueiredo*
Affiliation:
IST/ITN, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa, Estrada Nacional 10, 2686-953 Sacavém, Portugal CENIMAT/I3N, Departamento de Ciências dos Materiais, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
Rui J.C. Silva
Affiliation:
CENIMAT/I3N, Departamento de Ciências dos Materiais, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
M. Fátima Araújo
Affiliation:
IST/ITN, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa, Estrada Nacional 10, 2686-953 Sacavém, Portugal
Francisco M. Braz Fernandes
Affiliation:
CENIMAT/I3N, Departamento de Ciências dos Materiais, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: elin@ctn.ist.utl.pt
Get access

Abstract

Studies on cultural metal artifacts can benefit greatly from microscopy techniques. The examination of microstructural features can provide relevant information about ancient manufacturing techniques, as well as about corrosion/degradation processes. In the present work, advantages of the use of multifocus imaging techniques in optical microscopy for the study of archaeological metals are presented. An archaeometallurgical study of a large collection of bronzes demonstrates the possibility of a microstructural study with no need for sample removal, which is a great advantage in the study of cultural objects. In addition, the study of mounted samples illustrates the advantages of the multifocus technique in the examination of particular corrosion features, with the possibility of three-dimensional reconstructions.

Type
Portuguese Society for Microscopy
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Backwell, L. & d'Errico, F. (2008). Early hominid bone tools from Drimolen, South Africa. J Archeol Sci 35, 28802894.Google Scholar
Cisneros, E. (2010). Automated multi-focus imaging. Axis 6, 113.Google Scholar
Davy, J. (1826). Observations of the changes which have taken place in some ancient alloys of copper. Philos Trans R Soc London 116, 5559.Google Scholar
d'Errico, F., Vanhaeren, M. & Wadley, L. (2008). Possible shell beads from the Middle Stone Age layers of Sibudu Cave, South Africa. J Archeol Sci 35, 26752685.Google Scholar
Figueiredo, E., Araújo, M.F., Silva, R.J.C. & Vilaça, R. (2013). Characterisation of a proto-historic bronze collection by micro-EDXRF. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B 296, 2631.Google Scholar
Figueiredo, E., Silva, R.J.C., Fernandes, F.M.B. & Araújo, M.F. (2010). Some long term corrosion patterns in archaeological metal artefacts. Mater Sci Forum 636637, 10301035.Google Scholar
Figueiredo, E., Valério, P., Araújo, M.F., Silva, R.J.C. & Monge Soares, A.M. (2011). Inclusions and metal composition of ancient copper-based artefacts: A diachronic view by micro-EDXRF and SEM-EDS. X-Ray Spectrom 40, 325332.Google Scholar
Haug, J.T., Haug, C., Maas, A., Fayers, S.R., Trewin, N.H. & Waloszek, D. (2009). Simple 3D images from fossil and recent micromaterial using light microscopy. J Microsc 233, 93101.Google Scholar
Ingo, G.M., Angelini, E., De Caro, T., Bultrini, G. & Mezzi, A. (2004). Microchemical investigation of archaeological copper-based artefacts used for currency in ancient Italy before the coinage. Surf Interf Anal 36, 866870.Google Scholar
Kienlin, T.L., Bischoff, E. & Opielka, H. (2006). Copper and bronze during the eneolithic and early Bronze Age: A metallographic examination of axes from the Northalpine region. Archaeometry 48, 453468.Google Scholar
MIT (2003). The metallographic examination of archaeological artifacts, Laboratory Manual. Summer Institute in Material Science and Material Culture. Available at http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/materials-science-and-engineering/3-094-materials-in-human-experience-spring-2004/laboratories/manual_suppl.pdf. Accessed October 22, 2012.Google Scholar
Niederöst, M., Niederöst, J. & Ščučka, J. (2003). Automatic 3D reconstruction and visualization of microscopic objects from a monoscopic multifocus image sequence. In Proccedings of the WG V/6 International Workshop Visualization and Animation of Reality-Based 3D Models, ISPRS Archives XXXIV-5/W10, Gruen, A., Murai, S., Niederoest, J. & Remondino, F. (Eds.), pp. 18. Engadin, Switzerland: International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.Google Scholar
Panseri, C. & Leoni, M. (1957). The manufacturing technique of Etruscan mirrors. Stud Conserv 3, 4963.Google Scholar
Pavlidis, G., Koutsoudis, A., Arnaoutoglou, F., Tsioukas, V. & Chamzas, C. (2007). Methods for 3D digitalization of cultural heritage. J Cult Herit 8, 9398.Google Scholar
Rasband, W.S. (1997–2012). ImageJ. Bethesda, MD: U.S. National Institutes of Health. Available at http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/.Google Scholar
Robbiola, L., Blengino, J.-M. & Fiaud, C. (1998). Morphology and mechanisms of formation of natural patinas on archaeological Cu-Sn alloys. Corros Sci 40, 20832111.Google Scholar
Robbiola, L. & Portier, R. (2006). A global approach to the authentication of ancient bronzes based on the characterization of the alloy-patina-environment system. J Cult Herit 7, 112.Google Scholar
Schmid, B. (2007). ImageJ 3D viewer. Available at http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/plugins/3d-viewer/. Accessed July 11, 2013.Google Scholar
Scott, D.A. (1990). Bronze disease: A review of some chemical problems and the role of relative humidity. J Am Inst Conserv 29, 193206.Google Scholar
Thiéry, V. (2013). External and internal features of garnet revealed by the multifocus imaging technique. Micron 44, 475478.Google Scholar
Thiéry, V. & Green, D.I. (2012). The multifocus imaging technique in petrology. Comput Geosci 45, 131138.Google Scholar
van Hoek, C.J., de Roo, M., van der Veer, G. & van der Laan, S.R. (2011). A SEM-EDS study of cultural heritage objects with interpretation of constituents and their distribution using PARC data analysis. Microsc Microanal 17, 656660.Google Scholar
Wang, Q. & Ottaway, B.S. (2004). Casting Experiments and Microstructure of Archaeologically Relevant Bronzes. BAR IS 13331. Oxford, UK: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Zamofing, T. & Hügli, H. (2004). Applied multifocus 3D microscopy. In Proc SPIE 5265-19, Two and Three-Dimensional Vision Systems for Inspection, Control, and Metrology, Batchelor, B.G. & Hugli, H. (Eds.), pp. 134353. Washington, DC: International Society for Optics and Photonics.Google Scholar