Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-12T02:04:05.059Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intermediate Magnification Imaging System for Whole Organs/Organisms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

Richard W. Cole ,
Carmen A. Mannella ,
Christian Renken  and
James N. Turner
Richard W. Cole
Affiliation:
Division of Genetic Disorders, Wadsworth Center, Albany, NY
Carmen A. Mannella
Affiliation:
Resource for Visualization of Biological Complexity, Wadsworth Center, Albany, NY
Christian Renken
Affiliation:
Resource for Visualization of Biological Complexity, Wadsworth Center, Albany, NY
James N. Turner
Affiliation:
Division of Genetic Disorders, Wadsworth Center, Albany, NY

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

There are many techniques for 3D imaging of biological specimens such as confocal, two-photon and, wide-field fluorescence microscopy, CAT scan, MRI, and optical coherence tomography. There are also many derivatives of these techniques, each having its strengths and weaknesses. Due to the differences in resolution, depth-of-field, and field-of-view, it is often difficult to compare images from the relatively high-resolution microscopy methods to the latter lower-resolution high-volume imaging methods. Effectively making this comparison could be very powerful in relating organ or organism level information to cellular level processes.

Type
Research Article
Information
Microscopy Today , Volume 14 , Issue 6 , November 2006 , pp. 48 - 51
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2006

References

1. Bryson-Richardson, R.J. and Currie, P.D.. - Optical projection tomography for spatio-temporal analysis in the zebrafish. - Zebrafish: 2nd Ed. Cellular And Developmental Biology. 2004.Google ScholarPubMed
2. Frank, J., Radermacher, M., Penczek, P., Zhu, J., Li, Y.H., Ladjadj, M., and Leith, A.. 1996. Spider and web - processing and visualization of images in 3d electron microscopy and related fields. Journal of Biology. 116(1):190–199.Google ScholarPubMed
3. Kerwin, J., Scott, M., Sharpe, J., Puelles, L., Robson, S.C., Martinez-de-la-Torre, M., Ferran, J.L., Feng, G., Baldock, R., Strachan, T., Davidson, D., and Lindsay, S.. 2004. - 3 dimensional modelling of early human brain development using optical projection tomography. - BMC Neuroscience 5:27.Google Scholar
4. Radermacher, M. 1992. Weighted Back Projection Methods. Electron Tomography. Frank, Joachim, editor. Plenum Press, New York, New York.Google Scholar
5. Sharpe, J., Ahlgren, U., Perry, P., Hill, B., Ross, A., Hecksher-Sorensen, J., Baldock, R., and Davidson, D.. 2002. - Optical projection tomography as a tool for 3D microscopy and gene expression studies. – Science 296:541–545.Google ScholarPubMed
6. Sharpe, J. 2003. - Optical projection tomography as a new tool for studying embryo anatomy. - Journal of Anatomy 202:175–181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Sharpe, J. 2004. - Optical projection tomography. - Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering 6:209–228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Tyszka, J.M., Ewald, A.J., Wallingford, J.B., and Fraser, S.E.. 2005. - New tools for visualization and analysis of morphogenesis in spherical embryos. - Developmental Dynamics 234:974–983.Google ScholarPubMed
9. Savoian, M.S. and C.L.Rieder. 2002. Mitosis in primary cultures of Drosophila melanogaster larval neuroblasts. Journal of Cell Science. 115(15):3061–3072.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed