Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T03:21:48.751Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Millsite, CuTeO3·2H2O: a new polymorph of teineite from Gråurdfjellet, Oppdal, Norway

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2018

Michael S. Rumsey ,
Mark D. Welch ,
Frode Mo ,
Annette K. Kleppe ,
John Spratt ,
Anthony R. Kampf  and
Morten P. Raanes
Michael S. Rumsey
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK.
Mark D. Welch*
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK.
Frode Mo
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU – Trondheim, NO-7491, Trondheim, Norway.
Annette K. Kleppe
Affiliation:
Diamond Light Source, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire OX11 0DE, UK
John Spratt
Affiliation:
Core Research Laboratories, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK
Anthony R. Kampf
Affiliation:
Mineral Sciences Department, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90007, USA
Morten P. Raanes
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU – Trondheim, NO-7491, Trondheim, Norway
*
*E-Mail: mdw@nhm.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Millsite, CuTeO3·2H2O, is a new mineral from Gråurdfjellet in Oppdal, Norway. It occurs as a minor secondary phase alongside teineite, other copper secondaries and relict primary tellurides in a boulder of quartz-rich granite, which is probably a glacial erratic. Millsite is bright cyan to royal blue in colour. The mineral is transparent to slightly translucent with a vitreous lustre and has a perfect (100) cleavage. It is brittle, has a conchoidal fracture and a pale green streak. Millsite is optically biaxial (+), α = 1.756(5), β = 1.794(5), γ = 1.925calc and 2Vmeas = 60(1)°. Millsite has monoclinic space group P21/c, with a = 7.4049(2) Å, b = 7.7873(2) Å, c = 8.5217(2) Å, β = 110.203(3)°, V = 461.17(2) Å3 and Z = 4. The empirical formula is Cu0.99(Te0.98Se0.02)O3(H2O)2. The five strongest reflections in the powder X-ray diffraction pattern are [dhkl in Å (hkl, Irel%)]: 6.954 (100, 100), 3.558 (012, 64), 2.838 (12$\bar 2$, 47), 2.675 (211, 43) and 3.175 (210, 39). The crystal structure has been determined to R1 = 0.016, wR2 = 0.036 and GooF = 1.049. The diagnostic structural unit of millsite consists of a Cu2O6(H2O)4 dimer that is decorated with four TeO3 groups connecting adjacent dimers and defining (100) heteropolyhedral sheets. These heteropolyhedral sheets are only connected by layers of structurally significant hydrogen bonds and correlate with the (100) cleavage. Millsite is a polymorph of teineite with a unique configuration of the M2O6(H2O)4 dimer that leads to a sheet topology. No isostructural selenium or tellurium analogue exists. The monoclinic polymorph (P21/c) of chalcomenite ‘monoclinic-CuSeO3·2H2O’ hereafter, ahlfeldite and MgSeO3·2H2O have M2O6(H2O)4 dimers, but their configuration differs significantly from that of millsite and leads to a framework topology rather than a sheet. Teineite does not have a dimeric structure and so is fundamentally different from millsite. The sheet topology of millsite appears to be unique among tellurites.

Keywords

millsitenew mineralcopper tellurite dihydrateteineitetype mineralNorway
Type
Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 82 , Issue 2 , April 2018 , pp. 433 - 444
Copyright
Copyright © Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Stuart Mills

References

Brown, I.D. and Altermatt, D. (1985) Bond-valence parameters obtained from a systematic analysis of the inorganic crystal structure database. Acta Crystallographica, B41, 244–247.Google Scholar
Christy, A.G. and Mills, S.J. (2013) Effect of lone-pair stereoactivity on polyhedral volume and structural flexibility: application to TeIVO6 octahedra. Acta Crystallographica, B69, 446–456.Google Scholar
Christy., A.G., Mills, S.J. and Kampf, A.R. (2016) A review of the structural architecture of tellurium oxycompounds. Mineralogical Magazine, 80, 415–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Effenberger, H. (1977) Verfeinerung der Kristallstruktur von synthetischem Teineit: CuTeO3·2H2O. Tschermaks mineralogische und petrographische Mitteilungen, 24, 287–298.Google Scholar
Farrugia, L.J. (1999) WinGX, an integrated system of Windows programs for the solution, refinement and analysis of single-crystal X-ray diffraction data. Journal of Applied Crystallography, 32, 837–838.Google Scholar
Fornadel, A.P., Spry, P.G., Haghnegahdar, M.A., Schauble, E.A., Jackson, S.E. and Mills, S.J. (2017) Stable Te isotope fractionation in tellurium-bearing minerals from precious metal hydrothermal ore deposits. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 202, 215–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, R.L. and Keeffe, E.C. (2009) Raman spectroscopic study of the tellurite minerals: graemite CuTeO3·H2O and teineite CuTeO3·2H2O. Journal of Raman Spectroscopy, 40, 128–132.Google Scholar
Housley, R.M., Kampf, A.R., Mills, S.J., Marty, J. and Thorne, B. (2011) The remarkable occurrence of rare secondary minerals at Otto Mountain near Baker, California – including seven new species. Rocks and Minerals, 86, 132–142.Google Scholar
Johnson, M.G. and Harrison, W.T.A. (2001) Magnesium selenite dehydrate, MgSeO3·2H2O. Acta Crystallographica, E57, 124–125.Google Scholar
Kampf, A.R., Housley, R.M., Mills, S.J., Marty, J. and Thorne, B. (2010) Lead tellurium oxysalts from Otto Mountain, near Baker, California: I. Ottoite, Pb2TeO5, a new mineral with chains of tellurate octahedral. American Mineralogist, 95, 1329–1336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larranaga, A., Mesa, J.L., Pizarro, J.L., Pena, A., Chapman, J.P., Arriortua, M.I. and Rojo, T. (2005) Thermal, spectroscopic and magnetic properties of the CoxNi1−x(SeO3)·2H2O (x = 0, 0.4, 1) phases and the crystal structure of Co0.4Ni0.6(SeO3)·2H2O. Materials Research Bulletin, 40, 781–793.Google Scholar
Luo, K., Chen, Z. and Ma, Z. (1984) The crystal structure of clinochalcomenite. Kexue Tongbao, 29, 352–355.Google Scholar
Mandarino, J.A. (1981) The Gladstone-Dale relationship. Part IV: the compatibility concept and its application. Canadian Mineralogist, 19, 441–450.Google Scholar
Marty, J., Kampf, A.R., Housley, R.M., Mills, S.J. and Weiβ, S. (2010) Seltene neue Tellurmineralien aus Kalifornien, Utah, Arizona und New Mexico (USA). Lapis, 35, 42–52 [In German].Google Scholar
Mills, S.J. and Christy, A.G. (2013) Revised values of the bond valence parameters for TeIV−O, TeVI−O and TeVI−Cl. Acta Crystallographica, B69, 145–149.Google Scholar
Mo, F., Larsen, F.K., Mathiesen, R., Måseide, K. and Øvergaard, J. (2000) Data submitted to IMA and stored as IMA 2001–000. Unpublished dataset.Google Scholar
Pasero, M. and Perchiazzi, N. (1989) Chalcomenite from Baccu Locci, Sardinia, Italy, mineral data and structure refinement. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Monatshefte, 1989, 551–556.Google Scholar
Robinson, P.D., Sen Gupta, P.K., Swihart, G.H. and Houk, L. (1992) Crystal structure, H positions, and the Se lone pair of synthetic Cu(H2O)2[SeO3]. American Mineralogist, 77, 834–838.Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G.M. (2008) A short history of SHELX. Acta Crystallographica, A64, 112–122.Google Scholar
Wilson, A.J.C. (editor) (1992) International Tables for Crystallography, Volume C. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Rumsey et al. supplementary material

Supplementary material

Download Rumsey et al. supplementary material(File)
File 9.2 KB